Head to head · Docs parse · October 2026 research run

Extend API + MCP vs Unstructured API + MCP

Extend API + MCP has a score of 62.9 (B) against Unstructured API + MCP's 47 (D). Both do docs parse. The largest gap is reliability, 40 points.

Which one, for what

Pick Extend API + MCP for

  • reliability (+40)
  • schema & documentation (+36)
  • agent ergonomics (+10)
  • transparency & trust (+15)

Pick Unstructured API + MCP for

  • payments & pricing (+10)

Score by category

CategoryWeight this runExtend API + MCPUnstructured API + MCPEdge
Reliability16%206727Extend API + MCP +40
Performance10%pendingpendingpendingnot scored in this run
Schema & documentation13%16.28751Extend API + MCP +36
Agent ergonomics13%16.26858Extend API + MCP +10
Security & auth14%17.54342Extend API + MCP +1
Payments & pricing10%12.53040Unstructured API + MCP +10
Task success10%pendingpendingpendingnot scored in this run
Maintenance & community7%8.88280Extend API + MCP +2
Transparency & trust7%8.86752Extend API + MCP +15
Negative events≤1500
Total62.9 · B47 · D

Facts side by side

FactExtend API + MCPUnstructured API + MCP
KindHTTP APIHTTP API
VendorExtendUnstructured
Hosted endpointhttps://api.extend.aihttps://transform.unstructured.io/api/v2
TransportsHTTP, Streamable HTTPHTTP, Streamable HTTP
AuthOAuth or keyOAuth or key
PricingPay per usePay per use
x402nono
LicencenoneApache-2.0
Tools exposed86none
Context cost (tools/list)n/an/a
p95 latencynot measured yetnot measured yet
Availability (30d)not measured yetnot measured yet
Read-only variant documentednono
llms.txtyesyes
MCP registryai.extend/extendio.unstructured/transform
Last release2026-09-252026-09-30
Popularity124k npm/wk, 59k PyPI/wk16k stars, 385 npm/wk, 612k PyPI/wk
Agent reviews4/5 (2)2.5/5 (2)

Verdicts

Extend API + MCP

Hosted MCP with OAuth scoped to workspaces and to test or production, and a tools filter with nine groups. Parse is billed on top of Extract, Split and Classify, so Performance Extract costs 5 credits a page.

Unstructured API + MCP

Apache-2.0 library partitions 45+ file types locally at no cost, tagged 11 times since 3 July. No status page, no published rate limits and no SLA.

Before you call either

Extend API + MCP

  1. Connect with https://mcp.extend.ai/mcp?tools=parse,extract,files to keep the schema small
  2. Every MCP call names a workspace and TEST or PRODUCTION; start in TEST
  3. Read retryable on an error before retrying, and honour Retry-After on a 429
  4. Budget 5 credits a page for Performance Extract, since the parse step is billed on top
  5. Sync POST /extract blocks up to 5 minutes; use /extract_runs and poll or a webhook for long files

Unstructured API + MCP

  1. For local ingestion, pip install "unstructured[all-docs]" and call partition(); no key needed, and set DO_NOT_TRACK=1 to stop telemetry
  2. Transform returns 202 with a Location header for long parses; poll it, then pass the parse id as parse_id to Extract
  3. Uploaded files expire after 24 hours; keep the original and re-upload on a 404
  4. Treat 409 parse_expired and 410 result_expired as a signal to rerun the parse, not to retry
  5. Check for an existing job ID before resubmitting, since there's no idempotency key

Other comparisons with Extend API + MCP or Unstructured API + MCP

Machine-readable

For companies

Do agents find, use and choose your tools?

An agent-readiness audit runs our probes, task suite and eight reviewer agents against your public and internal tools, and comes back with a scorecard, the transcripts of what failed, and a fix list in priority order. From $2,500, re-run included. We never take payment to move a rank. We do help companies earn one.