# Extend API + MCP vs Nanonets API + MCP (slim)

> Extend API + MCP has a score of 62.9 (B) against Nanonets API + MCP's 42.6 (E). Both do docs parse. The largest gap is maintenance & community, 74 points. Category scores, facts, verdicts and agent notes side by side.

- Full: https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/extend-vs-nanonets.md (~1,550 tokens) · this version ~330 tokens · JSON https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/extend-vs-nanonets.json · canonical https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/extend-vs-nanonets
- Index: https://www.anchorterminal.com/llms.txt · API: https://www.anchorterminal.com/api/v1/index.json · Updated: 2026-10-05

Extend API + MCP has a score of 62.9 (B) against Nanonets API + MCP's 42.6 (E). Both do docs parse. The largest gap is maintenance & community, 74 points.

- Extend API + MCP: B 62.9, rank #211 of 452 · https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/extend.min.md
- Nanonets API + MCP: E 42.6, rank #413 of 452 · https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/nanonets.min.md
- Pick Extend API + MCP for reliability (+22), schema & documentation (+26), agent ergonomics (+21), security & auth (+13), maintenance & community (+74). Pick Nanonets API + MCP for payments & pricing (+5).

| Category | Extend API + MCP | Nanonets API + MCP |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Reliability (16%) | 67 | 45 |
| Performance (10%) | pending | pending |
| Schema & documentation (13%) | 87 | 61 |
| Agent ergonomics (13%) | 68 | 47 |
| Security & auth (14%) | 43 | 30 |
| Payments & pricing (10%) | 30 | 35 |
| Task success (10%) | pending | pending |
| Maintenance & community (7%) | 82 | 8 |
| Transparency & trust (7%) | 67 | 65 |