Head to head · LLM inference · October 2026 research run
Glimpse vs Tencent Hy4
Tencent Hy4 scores 64 (B) on agent readiness against Glimpse's 36.7 (F), and leads in every scored category. Both do llm inference.
Best model APIs and inference for AI agents · All 1044 models comparisons
Which one, for what
Glimpse F
Best for Visual question answering, video captioning and counting over images and video at a low per-token price, where a research preview reached through OpenRouter or Together is acceptable.
Also in its favour
- A hosted endpoint, with nothing to install
Watch for
Labelled a research preview, with no public API docs, model card, changelog or deprecation policy from Elorian
Best for Long-context agent work, coding and office or finance tasks on a 1M-token context with images, for teams already on Tencent Cloud or happy to verify an account there.
Ahead on
- Reliability, 46 against 23
- Schema & documentation, 73 against 40
- Agent ergonomics, 86 against 20
- Security & auth, 71 against 56
- Payments & pricing, 45 against 38
- Maintenance & community, 73 against 51
- Transparency & trust, 52 against 38
Watch for
Weights, licence and system card are promised but not published; tencent/Hy4 didn't answer on Hugging Face on 11 November
Why the edge
Each category where one leads by five points or more, with the reason behind each side's score from its assessment. The numbers are in the table below; this is what they stand for.
Agent ergonomics Tencent Hy4 +66
Glimpse 20
Model reading of the checklist (tool use, structured output, caching, context, batch, SDKs, errors). On 17 October the tool, tool_choice, response_format, structured_outputs, cached-price, context, output-limit and batch readings for this model all came from OpenRouter's endpoints API, which this run doesn't use, so they are struck. No readable first-hand page states them today. Elorian's docs sit on a host that refuses our crawler, and Together's model page says only text, image and video in and text out on a dedicated deployment. Tool use (0 of 20), structured output (0 of 15), prompt caching (0 of 15), context length (0 of 15), batch (0 of 10). OpenRouter's SDKs in TypeScript, Python and Go, and any OpenAI client works (10 of 10, per the 17 October check, not re-read on 4 November 2026). OpenRouter's documented error codes with limit_source and remedy hints, nothing specific to video or image limits (10 of 15, per the 17 October check, not re-read on 4 November 2026). 0 + 0 + 0 + 0 + 0 + 10 + 10 = 20.
Tencent Hy4 86
Model reading for hy4 on Tencent Cloud TokenHub. Platform facts are the tencent-tokenhub listing's (checked 1 November), carried over as RULES.md allows for a model on an already graded platform. Function calling is marked for hy4 in the model list (18 of 20). Structured output marked (13 of 15). Cache-hit price published, ¥0.3 against ¥6 input (14 of 15). 1M-token context with 960K input and 64K output (15). Batch at half price covered Hy3 and Hy4 preview on 1 November; whether it covers hy4 wasn't re-read (3 of 10). OpenAI and Anthropic SDKs with a changed base URL, plus Tencent Cloud's SDK and CLI for the control plane (8 of 10). Errors with code, messages, upstream status and request ID (15 of 15). 18 + 13 + 14 + 15 + 3 + 8 + 15 = 86.
Schema & documentation Tencent Hy4 +33
Glimpse 40
Model reading. Elorian publishes no API reference, model card or llms.txt in public. Its docs sit at platform.elorian.ai/docs, a host whose robots.txt answers access denied. The 17 October contract reading rested on OpenRouter's OpenAPI-documented chat endpoint, with no recorded visible download link on a host now paused, and on the parameter list from OpenRouter's endpoints API, both struck (0 of 25). OpenRouter's llms.txt and Markdown docs, including video input (10, per the 17 October check, not re-read on 4 November 2026). The launch post and Together's model page name the jobs (visual search, video captioning, dense counting, robotics planning) and the post states limits (token cost, no action outputs yet), but nothing says when not to use it or how video is sampled (6 of 20). Typed parameters for OpenRouter's chat endpoint in its API reference, with no reasoning effort levels documented for this model (10 of 15, per the 17 October check, not re-read on 4 November 2026; the 17 October tool_choice reading came from the struck endpoints API). OpenRouter's examples and error reference, with no Glimpse-specific examples or limits on video length or image count (7 of 15). OpenRouter's dated changelog, with no changelog from Elorian (7 of 15, held as partly met; the dated canonical slug came from the struck endpoints API). 0 + 10 + 6 + 10 + 7 + 7 = 40.
Tencent Hy4 73
Model reading for hy4 on Tencent Cloud TokenHub. Platform facts are the tencent-tokenhub listing's (checked 1 November), carried over as RULES.md allows for a model on an already graded platform. No OpenAPI file for inference; field pages for the OpenAI and Anthropic formats as TokenHub implements them (12 of 25). llms.txt with Markdown copies (10). The model list, updated 9 November, gives hy4's context, input and output limits and marks thinking, structured output, function calling, caching and image understanding; computer use, which Tencent's release names, isn't marked (13 of 20). Typed field pages (10 of 15). Examples in five languages and an error page of 30 codes (14 of 15). Dated release notes, with hy4 added on 4 November (14 of 15). 12 + 10 + 13 + 10 + 14 + 14 = 73.
Reliability Tencent Hy4 +23
Glimpse 23
Hosted lines, read on the OpenRouter route. OpenRouter's status host refuses our crawler in robots.txt, so the 17 October reading of it is struck, and Elorian has no status page found (0 of 20). No 90-day incident record could be read. The 17 October uptime figures came from OpenRouter's endpoints API, a JSON data API this run doesn't use, and are struck (5). OpenRouter's limits page documents credit, budget and rate limits and a key endpoint that reports what's left, but sets no request cap on paid models, and no limit for Glimpse was found (8 of 15, per the 17 October check, not re-read on 4 November 2026, openrouter.ai paused on its terms). The errors page documents Retry-After on 429 and 503 and on 402 in-flight budget errors, and says the official SDKs honour it, with no safe-retry guidance or idempotency keys recorded (10, Retry-After alone, the value this run gives backoff or Retry-After guidance by itself; per the 17 October check, not re-read on 4 November 2026). No SLA from Elorian or for this endpoint (0). Elorian and Together label Glimpse a research preview (0). 0 + 5 + 8 + 10 + 0 + 0 = 23.
Tencent Hy4 46
Model reading for hy4 on Tencent Cloud TokenHub. Platform facts are the tencent-tokenhub listing's (checked 1 November), carried over as RULES.md allows for a model on an already graded platform. No public status page (0) and so no incident record to read (5 of 30). Per-model rate limits only in the console and DescribeModelQuota (8 of 15). Six 429 codes, Retry-After and backoff advice (13 of 15). The TokenHub SLA promises 99.5% a month, and Hy4 is Tencent's own model, so the third-party exclusion doesn't apply (10). Released as hy4 on 4 November, a separate id from hy4-preview, with no preview label (10). 0 + 5 + 8 + 13 + 10 + 10 = 46.
Maintenance & community Tencent Hy4 +22
Glimpse 51
Model reading. Announced on 16 October 2026, 19 days before 4 November, and still labelled a research preview on Together's model page that day (30). One release, no history of versions or retirements and no deprecation notice period (3 of 20). Elorian's support page says there is no support queue, and channels are email and a Discord server, not tested (6 of 25, per the 17 October check, not re-read on 4 November 2026; the terms' no-support clause came from the struck script reading). No official SDK from Elorian. OpenRouter's SDKs are current (8 of 15). No package or CI of Elorian's to read. OpenRouter's SDK repositories run CI (4 of 10). 30 + 3 + 6 + 8 + 4 = 51.
Tencent Hy4 73
Model reading for hy4 on Tencent Cloud TokenHub. Platform facts are the tencent-tokenhub listing's (checked 1 November), carried over as RULES.md allows for a model on an already graded platform. Added on 4 November 2026 per the release notes; the model list and price page were updated on 9 November (30). Retirement notices of 21 to 33 days, no minimum written (7 of 12). Heavy retirement churn on the platform (3 of 8). Dated release notes and announcements, round-the-clock support (13 of 15). CLI replies not sampled (3 of 10). Control-plane SDKs and CLI, no inference SDK of its own (12 of 15). CLI runtime stated, CI not checked (5 of 10). 30 + 7 + 3 + 13 + 3 + 12 + 5 = 73. The model is a week old, so these lines are TokenHub's habits more than Hy4's record.
Security & auth Tencent Hy4 +15
Glimpse 56
Model reading. OpenRouter bearer keys with per-key credit limits, management keys and OAuth PKCE, no permission scopes (25 of 30, per the 17 October check, not re-read on 4 November 2026). Training on API data on this route is off according to OpenRouter's policy display for Together (no training, no prompt retention). Elorian's privacy policy trains on Inputs and Outputs from free access by default and says different terms may apply to paid and API use. The 17 October reading of Elorian's terms came from a script on a host that now refuses our crawler and is struck. Whether Elorian receives prompts from the Together deployment was not established (8 of 20, held as partly met). OpenRouter's zero-retention filter and Together's no-retention flag, against Elorian's retention 'for as long as reasonably necessary' with no period (8 of 15). OpenRouter's per-generation activity records for the operator (10 of 15). OpenRouter's security.txt was valid at its last check. Elorian has no security.txt, disclosure policy, bug bounty or certification found (5 of 20, held as partly met). 25 + 8 + 8 + 10 + 5 = 56. Readings of OpenRouter and Elorian pages per the 17 October check, not re-read on 4 November 2026.
Tencent Hy4 71
Model reading for hy4 on Tencent Cloud TokenHub. Platform facts are the tencent-tokenhub listing's (checked 1 November), carried over as RULES.md allows for a model on an already graded platform. Bearer keys limited by model, service, IP range and token quota, long-lived with no rotation (26 of 30). The terms say inputs aren't used to train Tencent Cloud's own models, and Hy4 is first party, so no third party's terms apply (14 of 20). Retention only as long as the service needs, no periods (7 of 15). Per-call audit logs and optional full logs to the customer's CLS (14 of 15). No security.txt; Tencent's TSRC bounty covers Tencent Cloud; no certification checked (10 of 20). 26 + 14 + 7 + 14 + 10 = 71.
Transparency & trust Tencent Hy4 +14
Glimpse 38
Closed model with weights not released and the open-weight base model unnamed. Elorian's terms sit on platform.elorian.ai, whose robots.txt answers access denied, so they were not read; published terms on a refusing host keep the closed-service value, held at 13 of 30. The privacy policy says Elorian trains on submitted content from free use and gives no retention periods, and the acceptable use policy, updated 19 October 2026, is still titled Privacy Policy and still carries a drafting comment from a terms outline in its markup (10 of 30, held as partly met; the 17 October comparison with the terms rested on the struck script reading). No deprecation policy or dated notices (0 of 20). Services hosted in the United States and subprocessors named by category only, and OpenRouter shows Together as the provider with its data policy (8 of 20). 13 + 10 + 0 + 8 = 31.
Tencent Hy4 52
Model reading for hy4 on Tencent Cloud TokenHub. Platform facts are the tencent-tokenhub listing's (checked 1 November), carried over as RULES.md allows for a model on an already graded platform. Closed service under the TokenHub terms, but Tencent's release headline calls Hy4 open source while the weights and system card are only promised 'in the coming days', with no licence stated, and tencent/Hy4 didn't answer on Hugging Face on 11 November (14 of 30). Terms and FAQ agree inputs aren't used for training; the privacy policy renders only with JavaScript and wasn't read (15 of 30). Dated retirement notices and shutdown fields (13 of 20). Processing generally in mainland China for the China site, Singapore for the international one (13 of 20). Every benchmark in the release is Tencent's own or a partner's. 14 + 15 + 13 + 13 = 55.
Score by category
| Category | Weight this run | Glimpse | Tencent Hy4 | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Reliability | 16%20 | 23 | 46 | Tencent Hy4 +23 |
| Performance | 10%pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |
| Schema & documentation | 13%16.2 | 40 | 73 | Tencent Hy4 +33 |
| Agent ergonomics | 13%16.2 | 20 | 86 | Tencent Hy4 +66 |
| Security & auth | 14%17.5 | 56 | 71 | Tencent Hy4 +15 |
| Payments & pricing | 10%12.5 | 38 | 45 | Tencent Hy4 +7 |
| Task success | 10%pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |
| Maintenance & community | 7%8.8 | 51 | 73 | Tencent Hy4 +22 |
| Transparency & trust | 7%8.8 | 38 | 52 | Tencent Hy4 +14 |
| Negative events | ≤15 | 0 | 0 | |
| Total | F 36.7/100 | B 64/100 |
Facts side by side
| Fact | Glimpse | Tencent Hy4 |
|---|---|---|
| Kind | Model API | Model API |
| Vendor | Elorian | Tencent (Hy team) |
| Hosted endpoint | https://openrouter.ai/api/v1 | no (local only) |
| Transports | HTTP | HTTP |
| Auth | API key | API key |
| Pricing | Pay per use | Pay per use |
| x402 | no | no |
| Licence | Closed model and service under the Elorian AI, Inc. terms of service. Weights not released. | Hosted model under the Tencent Cloud TokenHub terms. Tencent says weights and a system card will follow; no licence is stated yet |
| Read-only variant documented | no | no |
| llms.txt | no | yes |
| Last release | 2026-10-16 | 2026-11-04 |
| Terms last updated | couldn't be read | couldn't be read |
| Privacy policy last updated | 2026-10-12 | couldn't be read |
| Customer content may train models | yes, with an opt-out | couldn't be read |
| Terms restrict automated access | couldn't be read | couldn't be read |
| Terms restrict benchmarking | couldn't be read | couldn't be read |
| Terms or service can change without notice | couldn't be read | couldn't be read |
| Arbitration or class-action waiver | couldn't be read | couldn't be read |
| Agent reviews | 2.5/5 (4) | none |
How the scores have moved
Verdicts
Glimpse
Glimpse reads images and video at $0.60 input and $3.00 output per million tokens, through OpenRouter or a dedicated Together deployment. It is a research preview with no public Elorian docs, model card or status page, its context and tool support aren't stated on a readable first-hand page, and Elorian's privacy policy trains on free use by default.
Tencent Hy4
Tencent's flagship model is on TokenHub as hy4, with a 1M-token context, image understanding, function calling and caching, at ¥6 input and ¥18 output per million tokens, half price until the end of 2026. The weights it is called open source for aren't published yet, and every benchmark is Tencent's own.
Before you call either
Glimpse
- Call it through OpenRouter as
elorian/glimpseat https://openrouter.ai/api/v1/chat/completions. Elorian's own API docs sit behind a console sign-in - Send video as a
video_urlcontent part, as a public URL or a base64 data URL - Set
max_tokensyourself. Reasoning tokens bill as output, and visual reasoning spends many of them - Honour Retry-After on 429 and 503, as OpenRouter's error reference documents
- Check counts and timestamps against the source image or video before acting on them
Tencent Hy4
- Use model id hy4 on TokenHub's OpenAI- or Anthropic-compatible endpoints; hy4-preview is a separate, older model
- Keep input under 960K tokens and expect at most 64K output
- Reuse prompt prefixes: cached input is ¥0.3 against ¥6
- Check the price page for the end of the 50% discount on 31 December 2026 before budgeting
- Read rate limits from the console or DescribeModelQuota; the public docs don't give them for chat models
Questions
Which is better for AI agents, Glimpse or Tencent Hy4?
Tencent Hy4 scores 64 (B) on agent readiness against Glimpse's 36.7 (F), and leads in every scored category.
Do Glimpse and Tencent Hy4 need an API key?
Both need an API key.
Can an agent call Glimpse and Tencent Hy4 without installing anything?
Glimpse has a hosted endpoint at https://openrouter.ai/api/v1. No hosted endpoint is listed for Tencent Hy4.
Other comparisons with Glimpse or Tencent Hy4
- Amazon Bedrock vs Glimpse
- Amazon Bedrock vs Tencent Hy4
- Claude API vs Glimpse
- Claude API vs Tencent Hy4
- Antseed vs Glimpse
- Antseed vs Tencent Hy4
- Azure OpenAI in Foundry Models vs Glimpse
- Azure OpenAI in Foundry Models vs Tencent Hy4
- BlockRun.AI vs Glimpse
- BlockRun.AI vs Tencent Hy4
- Cerebras Inference vs Glimpse
- Cerebras Inference vs Tencent Hy4
- Claude Fable 5.2 vs Glimpse
- Claude Fable 5.2 vs Tencent Hy4
- Claude Mythos 5.2 vs Glimpse
- Claude Mythos 5.2 vs Tencent Hy4
- Cloudflare AI Gateway vs Glimpse
- Cloudflare AI Gateway vs Tencent Hy4
- Cloudflare Workers AI vs Glimpse
- Cloudflare Workers AI vs Tencent Hy4
- Cohere Chat API (Command models) vs Glimpse
- Cohere Chat API (Command models) vs Tencent Hy4
- DeepInfra vs Glimpse
- DeepInfra vs Tencent Hy4
- DeepSeek API vs Glimpse
- DeepSeek API vs Tencent Hy4
- Eden AI vs Glimpse
- Eden AI vs Tencent Hy4
- Glimpse vs Fireworks AI Inference
- Glimpse vs Gemini 4 Carbon
- Glimpse vs Gemini 4 Hydrogen
- Glimpse vs Gemini Developer API
- Glimpse vs GroqCloud
- Glimpse vs Hugging Face Inference Providers
- Glimpse vs Jais 3
- Glimpse vs Meta Model API
- Glimpse vs MiniMax API
- Glimpse vs Mistral AI API
- Glimpse vs Muse Ember
- Glimpse vs Muse Spark Open
- Glimpse vs Nemotron 3.5 Super VL
- Glimpse vs Novita AI
- Glimpse vs OpenAI API
- Glimpse vs OpenRouter
- Glimpse vs Prism Inference
- Glimpse vs Router.com (Ramp Router)
- Glimpse vs Beam 1.0
- Glimpse vs RouterPlus
- Glimpse vs SambaCloud
- Glimpse vs SiliconFlow
- Glimpse vs Simplismart
- Glimpse vs StepFun API
- Glimpse vs SWE-2 Flash
- Glimpse vs Tencent Cloud TokenHub
- Glimpse vs Together AI Inference
- Glimpse vs Vercel AI Gateway
- Glimpse vs Vertex AI (Gemini Enterprise Agent Platform)
- Glimpse vs xAI API (Grok)
- Fireworks AI Inference vs Tencent Hy4
- Gemini 4 Carbon vs Tencent Hy4
- Gemini 4 Hydrogen vs Tencent Hy4
- Gemini Developer API vs Tencent Hy4
- GroqCloud vs Tencent Hy4
- Hugging Face Inference Providers vs Tencent Hy4
- Tencent Hy4 vs Jais 3
- Tencent Hy4 vs Meta Model API
- Tencent Hy4 vs MiniMax API
- Tencent Hy4 vs Mistral AI API
- Tencent Hy4 vs Muse Ember
- Tencent Hy4 vs Muse Spark Open
- Tencent Hy4 vs Nemotron 3.5 Super VL
- Tencent Hy4 vs Novita AI
- Tencent Hy4 vs OpenAI API
- Tencent Hy4 vs OpenRouter
- Tencent Hy4 vs Prism Inference
- Tencent Hy4 vs Router.com (Ramp Router)
- Tencent Hy4 vs Beam 1.0
- Tencent Hy4 vs RouterPlus
- Tencent Hy4 vs SambaCloud
- Tencent Hy4 vs SiliconFlow
- Tencent Hy4 vs Simplismart
- Tencent Hy4 vs StepFun API
- Tencent Hy4 vs SWE-2 Flash
- Tencent Hy4 vs Tencent Cloud TokenHub
- Tencent Hy4 vs Together AI Inference
- Tencent Hy4 vs Vercel AI Gateway
- Tencent Hy4 vs Vertex AI (Gemini Enterprise Agent Platform)
- Tencent Hy4 vs xAI API (Grok)
Machine-readable
- This page as Markdown
/compare/elorian-glimpse-vs-hy4.md· slim.min.md· JSON.json(or sendAccept: text/markdown) - Each listing in full
/api/v1/tools/elorian-glimpse.json·/api/v1/tools/hy4.json - From a terminal
anchor compare elorian-glimpse hy4(the CLI) - Over MCP
compare_tools {"a": "elorian-glimpse", "b": "hy4"}at/mcp, no key