Head to head · LLM inference · October 2026 research run
Tencent Hy4 vs RouterPlus
Tencent Hy4 scores 64 (B) on agent readiness against RouterPlus's 52.8 (D), and leads in 6 of 7 scored categories. RouterPlus leads on payments & pricing. Both do llm inference.
Best model APIs and inference for AI agents · All 1044 models comparisons
Which one, for what
Best for Long-context agent work, coding and office or finance tasks on a 1M-token context with images, for teams already on Tencent Cloud or happy to verify an account there.
Ahead on
- Schema & documentation, 73 against 59
- Agent ergonomics, 86 against 71
- Security & auth, 71 against 59
- Maintenance & community, 73 against 44
- Transparency & trust, 52 against 41
Watch for
Weights, licence and system card are promised but not published; tencent/Hy4 didn't answer on Hugging Face on 11 November
Best for Teams that call Claude, GPT and open-weight models from one key and want the cost of every call in the response, with their own provider keys where they have them.
Ahead on
- Payments & pricing, 60 against 45
Also in its favour
- A hosted endpoint, with nothing to install
Watch for
No terms of service, privacy policy, status page, changelog or security.txt found for the gateway
Why the edge
Each category where one leads by five points or more, with the reason behind each side's score from its assessment. The numbers are in the table below; this is what they stand for.
Maintenance & community Tencent Hy4 +29
Tencent Hy4 73
Model reading for hy4 on Tencent Cloud TokenHub. Platform facts are the tencent-tokenhub listing's (checked 1 November), carried over as RULES.md allows for a model on an already graded platform. Added on 4 November 2026 per the release notes; the model list and price page were updated on 9 November (30). Retirement notices of 21 to 33 days, no minimum written (7 of 12). Heavy retirement churn on the platform (3 of 8). Dated release notes and announcements, round-the-clock support (13 of 15). CLI replies not sampled (3 of 10). Control-plane SDKs and CLI, no inference SDK of its own (12 of 15). CLI runtime stated, CI not checked (5 of 10). 30 + 7 + 3 + 13 + 3 + 12 + 5 = 73. The model is a week old, so these lines are TokenHub's habits more than Hy4's record.
RouterPlus 44
Router, read on the model lines. No changelog or release notes found. The blog, re-read on 4 November 2026, dates the launch of ScaleDown's extract-1 and summarize-1 on chat completions and classify-1 on the decisions API to 13 October 2026, and the catalogue now lists 105 chat models against 19 on 13 October, so the API changed within the last 30 days (30). The docs also date a console change on 17 October 2026 (keys can be copied again), which isn't counted, since it changes the console and not the API. Models carry a deprecation_date that delists them automatically, with no notice period stated (3 of 12). POST /v1/signup and the magic-link route were removed and Optimize is paused, none with a date we could find (3 of 8). No public changelog. Support is reached through the console and an email address, and wasn't tested (3 of 15). No public issue tracker for the gateway (0 of 10). No official SDK. The docs rely on the OpenAI and Anthropic SDKs and give client setups (5 of 15). No package or public repository to check (0 of 10).
Agent ergonomics Tencent Hy4 +15
Tencent Hy4 86
Model reading for hy4 on Tencent Cloud TokenHub. Platform facts are the tencent-tokenhub listing's (checked 1 November), carried over as RULES.md allows for a model on an already graded platform. Function calling is marked for hy4 in the model list (18 of 20). Structured output marked (13 of 15). Cache-hit price published, ¥0.3 against ¥6 input (14 of 15). 1M-token context with 960K input and 64K output (15). Batch at half price covered Hy3 and Hy4 preview on 1 November; whether it covers hy4 wasn't re-read (3 of 10). OpenAI and Anthropic SDKs with a changed base URL, plus Tencent Cloud's SDK and CLI for the control plane (8 of 10). Errors with code, messages, upstream status and request ID (15 of 15). 18 + 13 + 14 + 15 + 3 + 8 + 15 = 86.
RouterPlus 71
Router, read on the model lines (tool use, structured output, caching, context, batch, SDKs, errors). Tools pass through on both surfaces, and Anthropic server tools such as web search work for Claude models on /v1/messages. Behaviour depends on the model (15 of 20). response_format works for GPT ids and the open models (re-read on 4 November 2026), and the docs tell callers to get JSON from Claude through a single tool, so structured output still rests on the provider (8 of 15, held). Cached-input and cache-write prices per model, a session id that keeps provider caches warm, and cache_control on the Anthropic surface (13 of 15). The catalogue's largest contexts are 1,050,000 tokens on GPT-6.1 Sol and 1,000,000 on Claude Sonnet 5.5, a judgement call since a router has no default model (15). No batch route (0 of 10). No SDK of its own. The OpenAI and Anthropic SDKs work with a changed base URL, and the docs give setups for ten coding tools (5 of 10). A stable error_type in every body and header, an origin header, the limit that refused a request, and x-tm-dropped-params naming every dropped field (15).
Payments & pricing RouterPlus +15
Tencent Hy4 45
Model reading for hy4 on Tencent Cloud TokenHub. Platform facts are the tencent-tokenhub listing's (checked 1 November), carried over as RULES.md allows for a model on an already graded platform. No machine payment protocol (0). The price page, updated 9 November, lists ¥6 input, ¥0.3 cached and ¥18 output per million tokens, with Hy4 billed at 50% until 31 December 2026 (20). TokenHub's campaign of 1M free tokens per language model, read on 1 November, isn't confirmed for hy4 on the price page, so half (10 of 20, a judgement call). A person signs up with real-name verification (0). 0 + 20 + 10 + 0 = 30. Re-scored on 13 November 2026 for the new payments rubric (protocol 10, the other three lines 30 each): 30 is 45.
RouterPlus 60
No machine payment protocol found in llms-full.txt. Calls draw on a prepaid balance (0). Per-token prices for every model are public in the docs catalogue and on the model pages with no login, re-read on 4 November 2026 (20). Signup adds no free credit, but inference through the caller's own provider keys carries no RouterPlus charge and needs no credit, the reading Cloudflare AI Gateway's dossier took for the same arrangement. We did not sign up to confirm that no card is asked for (20). A person signs up in the browser through Clerk with email verification, and the programmatic signup route was removed (0). Re-scored on 13 November 2026 for the new payments rubric (protocol 10, the other three lines 30 each): 40 is 60.
Schema & documentation Tencent Hy4 +14
Tencent Hy4 73
Model reading for hy4 on Tencent Cloud TokenHub. Platform facts are the tencent-tokenhub listing's (checked 1 November), carried over as RULES.md allows for a model on an already graded platform. No OpenAPI file for inference; field pages for the OpenAI and Anthropic formats as TokenHub implements them (12 of 25). llms.txt with Markdown copies (10). The model list, updated 9 November, gives hy4's context, input and output limits and marks thinking, structured output, function calling, caching and image understanding; computer use, which Tencent's release names, isn't marked (13 of 20). Typed field pages (10 of 15). Examples in five languages and an error page of 30 codes (14 of 15). Dated release notes, with hy4 added on 4 November (14 of 15). 12 + 10 + 13 + 10 + 14 + 14 = 73.
RouterPlus 59
Router, scored on the API lines. No OpenAPI or other machine-readable contract for the gateway was found. It follows the OpenAI and Anthropic wire formats, which this checklist doesn't credit to a reseller, the same reading as Antseed (0 of 25). llms.txt, llms-full.txt and a Markdown copy of every page (10). Each route page says what it is for, what isn't available, and which route to use for which model, and the agent integration guide lists what not to build on (18 of 20). Request fields follow the upstream formats, and the wire compatibility page tables which fields pass, translate, drop or fail with a typed 400 (12 of 15). Curl, Python and TypeScript examples on every page, and an error reference with a class, status and remedy for each error (15). Routes are versioned under /v1 and the wire compatibility page says changing it needs a recorded decision, but no changelog or dated release notes were found, re-read on 4 November 2026 (4 of 15).
Security & auth Tencent Hy4 +12
Tencent Hy4 71
Model reading for hy4 on Tencent Cloud TokenHub. Platform facts are the tencent-tokenhub listing's (checked 1 November), carried over as RULES.md allows for a model on an already graded platform. Bearer keys limited by model, service, IP range and token quota, long-lived with no rotation (26 of 30). The terms say inputs aren't used to train Tencent Cloud's own models, and Hy4 is first party, so no third party's terms apply (14 of 20). Retention only as long as the service needs, no periods (7 of 15). Per-call audit logs and optional full logs to the customer's CLS (14 of 15). No security.txt; Tencent's TSRC bounty covers Tencent Cloud; no certification checked (10 of 20). 26 + 14 + 7 + 14 + 10 = 71.
RouterPlus 59
Router, read on the model lines. tm_vk_ keys are stored as SHA-256 hashes and revocable, each bound to a workspace and principal, with per-key RPM and monthly spend caps. Since 17 October 2026 the console also keeps an encrypted copy so an owner or admin can copy a key again, and an organisation can ask for copying to be turned off. Inference keys have no management rights. There are no permission scopes on a key and no SSO or SCIM (24 of 30). RouterPlus says it does not train on request logs and does not share them, and deletes them after 30 days. Most Claude and GPT routes are marked prompt_logging: retained with no ZDR, so retention and training upstream rest on each provider's API terms, while DeepInfra's open models, Perplexity, Cloudflare Workers AI, Fastino and RouterPlus's own models declare none (12 of 20, held). The data policy re-read on 4 November 2026 says requests and responses to non-dedicated endpoints are now logged by default for up to 30 days for debugging, with recognised keys removed. On 13 October it said content was kept only for hackathon accounts. Opting out takes a request to support, dedicated endpoints are excluded, and the zdr and data_collection: deny filters still remove every marketplace route, so they work only on the caller's own provider keys. Cloudflare AI Gateway, with default logging and a per-request header to switch it off, has 11 here (7 of 15, 10 before). GET /v1/generation lists every attempt behind a request with provider, tokens and cost, and the console has usage and logs (14 of 15). No security.txt (404 on both hosts on 4 November 2026), disclosure policy, bug bounty or certification found. The footer's Security link is an email to founders@evo-hq.com (2 of 20). 24 + 12 + 7 + 14 + 2 = 59.
Transparency & trust Tencent Hy4 +11
Tencent Hy4 52
Model reading for hy4 on Tencent Cloud TokenHub. Platform facts are the tencent-tokenhub listing's (checked 1 November), carried over as RULES.md allows for a model on an already graded platform. Closed service under the TokenHub terms, but Tencent's release headline calls Hy4 open source while the weights and system card are only promised 'in the coming days', with no licence stated, and tencent/Hy4 didn't answer on Hugging Face on 11 November (14 of 30). Terms and FAQ agree inputs aren't used for training; the privacy policy renders only with JavaScript and wasn't read (15 of 30). Dated retirement notices and shutdown fields (13 of 20). Processing generally in mainland China for the China site, Singapore for the international one (13 of 20). Every benchmark in the release is Tencent's own or a partner's. 14 + 15 + 13 + 13 = 55.
RouterPlus 41
Closed service with no terms of service found. The only terms on the site govern the capacity request form, under EVO HQ Inc (0 of 30). The data policy page is detailed, lists what is stored and why, and gives a 30-day period for request logs and each provider's retention flag. Its 4 November 2026 text, which logs request content by default, no longer agrees with the homepage FAQ; that contradiction is charged once as a misleading claim under negative events, not on this line. There is no privacy policy, no DPA and no retention period for account data such as email addresses (14 of 30, held). Model retirement by deprecation_date is documented with no notice period, and no dated deprecation notices were found (4 of 20). The docs name Clerk, Resend and an AWS bucket, and say RouterPlus's own GPUs run in the United States. The form's terms name Supabase, Cloudflare and Resend. No complete subprocessor list or gateway hosting location was found (8 of 20).
Score by category
| Category | Weight this run | Tencent Hy4 | RouterPlus | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Reliability | 16%20 | 46 | 42 | Tencent Hy4 +4 |
| Performance | 10%pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |
| Schema & documentation | 13%16.2 | 73 | 59 | Tencent Hy4 +14 |
| Agent ergonomics | 13%16.2 | 86 | 71 | Tencent Hy4 +15 |
| Security & auth | 14%17.5 | 71 | 59 | Tencent Hy4 +12 |
| Payments & pricing | 10%12.5 | 45 | 60 | RouterPlus +15 |
| Task success | 10%pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |
| Maintenance & community | 7%8.8 | 73 | 44 | Tencent Hy4 +29 |
| Transparency & trust | 7%8.8 | 52 | 41 | Tencent Hy4 +11 |
| Negative events | ≤15 | 0 | -2 | |
| Total | B 64/100 | D 52.8/100 |
Facts side by side
| Fact | Tencent Hy4 | RouterPlus |
|---|---|---|
| Kind | Model API | Model router |
| Vendor | Tencent (Hy team) | RouterPlus |
| Hosted endpoint | no (local only) | https://api.routerplus.com/v1 |
| Transports | HTTP | HTTP |
| Auth | API key | API key |
| Pricing | Pay per use | Pay per use |
| x402 | no | no |
| Licence | Hosted model under the Tencent Cloud TokenHub terms. Tencent says weights and a system card will follow; no licence is stated yet | Closed service. No terms of service for the gateway were found on routerplus.com or app.routerplus.com on 13 October 2026. The only terms on the site govern the capacity request form and name EVO HQ Inc, a Delaware corporation (https://routerplus.com/capacity/terms/). |
| Read-only variant documented | no | no |
| llms.txt | yes | yes |
| Last release | 2026-11-04 | none |
| Terms last updated | couldn't be read | no document linked |
| Privacy policy last updated | couldn't be read | no document linked |
| Customer content may train models | couldn't be read | not read yet |
| Terms restrict automated access | couldn't be read | not read yet |
| Terms restrict benchmarking | couldn't be read | not read yet |
| Terms or service can change without notice | couldn't be read | not read yet |
| Arbitration or class-action waiver | couldn't be read | not read yet |
How the scores have moved
Verdicts
Tencent Hy4
Tencent's flagship model is on TokenHub as hy4, with a 1M-token context, image understanding, function calling and caching, at ¥6 input and ¥18 output per million tokens, half price until the end of 2026. The weights it is called open source for aren't published yet, and every benchmark is Tencent's own.
RouterPlus
The docs are written for agents, every model price is public, and each response carries its own cost. No terms of service, privacy policy, status page or changelog were found. Request content is now logged for 30 days by default while the homepage says prompts aren't stored, and signup adds no free credit.
Before you call either
Tencent Hy4
- Use model id hy4 on TokenHub's OpenAI- or Anthropic-compatible endpoints; hy4-preview is a separate, older model
- Keep input under 960K tokens and expect at most 64K output
- Reuse prompt prefixes: cached input is ¥0.3 against ¥6
- Check the price page for the end of the 50% discount on 31 December 2026 before budgeting
- Read rate limits from the console or DescribeModelQuota; the public docs don't give them for chat models
RouterPlus
- Send
max_tokenson every request. Without it the balance hold assumes up to 32,768 output tokens and can returninsufficient_quotaon a small balance - Switch on
error_type. Retryrate_limitafterretry-after, and stop oninsufficient_quota, which needs a person to add credit or raise a cap - Don't add a retry loop on top of the SDK's. There is no idempotency key, so a retry that reaches a provider is billed again
- Keep secrets out of prompts. Request content is logged for up to 30 days unless the organisation has opted out through support
- Use
/v1/messagesfor Claude when you needthinkingor server tools.response_formatworks for GPT ids and open models, not Claude
Questions
Which is better for AI agents, Tencent Hy4 or RouterPlus?
Tencent Hy4 scores 64 (B) on agent readiness against RouterPlus's 52.8 (D), and leads in 6 of 7 scored categories. RouterPlus leads on payments & pricing.
Do Tencent Hy4 and RouterPlus need an API key?
Both need an API key.
Can an agent call Tencent Hy4 and RouterPlus without installing anything?
No hosted endpoint is listed for Tencent Hy4. RouterPlus has a hosted endpoint at https://api.routerplus.com/v1.
Other comparisons with Tencent Hy4 or RouterPlus
- Amazon Bedrock vs Tencent Hy4
- Amazon Bedrock vs RouterPlus
- Claude API vs Tencent Hy4
- Claude API vs RouterPlus
- Antseed vs Tencent Hy4
- Azure OpenAI in Foundry Models vs Tencent Hy4
- Azure OpenAI in Foundry Models vs RouterPlus
- BlockRun.AI vs Tencent Hy4
- BlockRun.AI vs RouterPlus
- Cerebras Inference vs Tencent Hy4
- Cerebras Inference vs RouterPlus
- Claude Fable 5.2 vs Tencent Hy4
- Claude Fable 5.2 vs RouterPlus
- Claude Mythos 5.2 vs Tencent Hy4
- Claude Mythos 5.2 vs RouterPlus
- Cloudflare AI Gateway vs Tencent Hy4
- Cloudflare AI Gateway vs RouterPlus
- Cloudflare Workers AI vs Tencent Hy4
- Cloudflare Workers AI vs RouterPlus
- Cohere Chat API (Command models) vs Tencent Hy4
- Cohere Chat API (Command models) vs RouterPlus
- DeepInfra vs Tencent Hy4
- DeepInfra vs RouterPlus
- DeepSeek API vs Tencent Hy4
- DeepSeek API vs RouterPlus
- Eden AI vs Tencent Hy4
- Glimpse vs Tencent Hy4
- Glimpse vs RouterPlus
- Fireworks AI Inference vs Tencent Hy4
- Fireworks AI Inference vs RouterPlus
- Gemini 4 Carbon vs Tencent Hy4
- Gemini 4 Carbon vs RouterPlus
- Gemini 4 Hydrogen vs Tencent Hy4
- Gemini 4 Hydrogen vs RouterPlus
- Gemini Developer API vs Tencent Hy4
- Gemini Developer API vs RouterPlus
- GroqCloud vs Tencent Hy4
- GroqCloud vs RouterPlus
- Hugging Face Inference Providers vs Tencent Hy4
- Tencent Hy4 vs Jais 3
- Tencent Hy4 vs Meta Model API
- Tencent Hy4 vs MiniMax API
- Tencent Hy4 vs Mistral AI API
- Tencent Hy4 vs Muse Ember
- Tencent Hy4 vs Muse Spark Open
- Tencent Hy4 vs Nemotron 3.5 Super VL
- Tencent Hy4 vs Novita AI
- Tencent Hy4 vs OpenAI API
- Tencent Hy4 vs OpenRouter
- Tencent Hy4 vs Prism Inference
- Tencent Hy4 vs Router.com (Ramp Router)
- Tencent Hy4 vs Beam 1.0
- Tencent Hy4 vs SambaCloud
- Tencent Hy4 vs SiliconFlow
- Tencent Hy4 vs Simplismart
- Tencent Hy4 vs StepFun API
- Tencent Hy4 vs SWE-2 Flash
- Tencent Hy4 vs Tencent Cloud TokenHub
- Tencent Hy4 vs Together AI Inference
- Tencent Hy4 vs Vercel AI Gateway
- Tencent Hy4 vs Vertex AI (Gemini Enterprise Agent Platform)
- Tencent Hy4 vs xAI API (Grok)
- Jais 3 vs RouterPlus
- Meta Model API vs RouterPlus
- MiniMax API vs RouterPlus
- Mistral AI API vs RouterPlus
- Muse Ember vs RouterPlus
- Muse Spark Open vs RouterPlus
- Nemotron 3.5 Super VL vs RouterPlus
- Novita AI vs RouterPlus
- OpenAI API vs RouterPlus
- OpenRouter vs RouterPlus
- Prism Inference vs RouterPlus
- Beam 1.0 vs RouterPlus
- RouterPlus vs SambaCloud
- RouterPlus vs SiliconFlow
- RouterPlus vs Simplismart
- RouterPlus vs StepFun API
- RouterPlus vs SWE-2 Flash
- RouterPlus vs Together AI Inference
- RouterPlus vs Vertex AI (Gemini Enterprise Agent Platform)
- RouterPlus vs xAI API (Grok)
- Antseed vs RouterPlus
- Eden AI vs RouterPlus
- Hugging Face Inference Providers vs RouterPlus
- LiteLLM vs RouterPlus
- Router.com (Ramp Router) vs RouterPlus
- RouterPlus vs Tencent Cloud TokenHub
- RouterPlus vs Vercel AI Gateway
Machine-readable
- This page as Markdown
/compare/hy4-vs-routerplus.md· slim.min.md· JSON.json(or sendAccept: text/markdown) - Each listing in full
/api/v1/tools/hy4.json·/api/v1/tools/routerplus.json - From a terminal
anchor compare hy4 routerplus(the CLI) - Over MCP
compare_tools {"a": "hy4", "b": "routerplus"}at/mcp, no key