Get an audit

Head to head · Analytics query · October 2026 research run

Countly vs Woopra

Countly scores 54.8 (C) on agent readiness against Woopra's 44.4 (E), and leads in 5 of 7 scored categories. Woopra leads on reliability and payments & pricing. Both do analytics query.

CountlyCountly Ltd · HTTP API C54.8/100#607 of 841 WoopraWoopra, Inc. · HTTP API E44.4/100#778 of 841

Which one, for what

Countly C

Good for An agent whose owner runs Countly on its own infrastructure or a dedicated Flex server and wants analytics, crash and remote-config data through MCP with per-category permissions.

Ahead on

  • Schema & documentation, 75 against 45
  • Agent ergonomics, 66 against 45
  • Security & auth, 63 against 22
  • Maintenance & community, 80 against 9
  • Transparency & trust, 70 against 61

Also in its favour

  • Runs on your own machine
  • Open source

Watch for

No public status page or incident history was found for Flex servers or for mcp.count.ly

Woopra E

Good for An agent that reads a company's existing Woopra reports, looks up or edits customer profiles, or exports raw sessions on a schedule.

Ahead on

  • Reliability, 80 against 28
  • Payments & pricing, 30 against 17

Watch for

Report endpoints run a report saved in the web app by report_id. No endpoint to define a query, funnel or segment was found in the reference

Score by category

CategoryWeight this runCountlyWoopraEdge
Reliability16%202880Woopra +52
Performance10%pendingpendingpendingnot scored in this run
Schema & documentation13%16.27545Countly +30
Agent ergonomics13%16.26645Countly +21
Security & auth14%17.56322Countly +41
Payments & pricing10%12.51730Woopra +13
Task success10%pendingpendingpendingnot scored in this run
Maintenance & community7%8.8809Countly +71
Transparency & trust7%8.87061Countly +9
Negative events≤1500
Total54.8 · C44.4 · E

Facts side by side

FactCountlyWoopra
KindHTTP APIHTTP API
VendorCountly LtdWoopra, Inc.
Hosted endpointhttps://mcp.count.ly/mcphttps://www.woopra.com/rest/3.10
TransportsHTTP, stdio, Streamable HTTPHTTP
AuthAPI keyOAuth or key
PricingPaidPaid
x402nono
LicenceCountly Lite is AGPL-3.0 with added branding terms under Section 7. Enterprise plugins are proprietary. Flex is a hosted service under Countly's terms. The MCP server is MITProprietary service under Woopra's terms of service. The browser tracker and the SDKs on GitHub are MIT, and the Node package is ISC
Tools exposed209none
Read-only variant documentedyesno
llms.txtyesyes
Last release2026-10-072026-03-16
Terms last updated2026-09-252025-12-10
Privacy policy last updated2026-09-252025-08-01
Customer content may train modelsnot found in the textnot found in the text
Terms restrict automated accessnot found in the textyes
Terms restrict benchmarkingnot found in the textnot found in the text
Terms or service can change without noticeyesnot found in the text
Arbitration or class-action waivernot found in the textyes
Popularity28k npm/wk415 npm/wk

Verdicts

Countly

Countly suits an agent working against a server its owner already runs. The official MCP server filters its 209 tools by edition, plugin and permission and has per-category read-only settings. No status page, OpenAPI document or published API rate limit was found, and the Flex trial needs a credit card.

Woopra

Woopra's REST API returns saved Trends, Journeys, Retention and Attribution reports, profiles and raw session logs, with published limits of 300 calls a minute and 3,000 a day per project. A report must first be built in the web app, the tracking endpoints accept events without a secret by default, and no changelog or SLA was found.

Before you call either

Countly

  1. Create a dedicated token in the Token Manager, limited to the apps and endpoints the task needs, and send it in the countly-token header, not the URL
  2. Set COUNTLY_TOOLS_ALL=R unless the task needs writes. The token's own permissions still apply and the stricter of the two wins
  3. Call apps_list first. Most tools need app_id or an exact app_name
  4. Check get_version for the detected edition before planning funnel, retention or cohort queries, which need Enterprise plugins
  5. Set ENABLE_ANALYTICS=false to stop usage reports to stats.count.ly, and prefer the stdio server to mcp.count.ly so the server URL and token stay local

Woopra

  1. Ask the owner to build and save each report in the web app first, then pass the last path segment of its URL as report_id
  2. Authenticate REST calls with HTTP Basic, using the App ID and Secret Key from the Access Keys tab, against https://www.woopra.com/rest/3.10/
  3. Stay under 300 calls a minute, 600 an hour and 3,000 a day per project. A 429 carries no documented retry interval, so back off on your own schedule
  4. Reuse the snapshot ID from the first response when paging with offset, or pages past 1,000 records may not agree
  5. Send cookie or a cv_ identifier such as cv_email on every track call. Without one the event lands on a random profile that can't be identified later
  6. When reading /logs/export, delete the profile named in each type: "delete" line. The following lines log its data again under new_id

Questions

Which is better for AI agents, Countly or Woopra?

Countly scores 54.8 (C) on agent readiness against Woopra's 44.4 (E), and leads in 5 of 7 scored categories. Woopra leads on reliability and payments & pricing.

Do Countly and Woopra need an API key?

Countly needs an API key. Woopra takes an API key or an OAuth sign-in.

Can an agent call Countly and Woopra without installing anything?

Yes. Countly has a hosted endpoint at https://mcp.count.ly/mcp and Woopra at https://www.woopra.com/rest/3.10.

Are Countly and Woopra open source?

Countly is open source (Countly Lite is AGPL-3.0 with added branding terms under Section 7. Enterprise plugins are proprietary. Flex is a hosted service under Countly's terms. The MCP server is MIT). No open-source release is listed for Woopra.

Other comparisons with Countly or Woopra

Machine-readable

For companies

Do agents find, use and choose your tools?

An agent-readiness audit runs our probes, task suite and eight reviewer agents against your public and internal tools, and comes back with a scorecard, the transcripts of what failed, and a fix list in priority order. From $2,500, re-run included. We never take payment to move a rank. We do help companies earn one.

Get an auditSee a sample report