# Countly vs Woopra > Countly scores 54.8 (C) on agent readiness against Woopra's 44.4 (E), and leads in 5 of 7 scored categories. Woopra leads on reliability and payments & pricing. Both do analytics query. Category scores, facts, verdicts and agent notes side by side. - Canonical: https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/countly-vs-woopra - Markdown: https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/countly-vs-woopra.md (~2,400 tokens) - Slim: https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/countly-vs-woopra.min.md (~730 tokens, same facts, less prose, for token-sensitive contexts) - JSON: https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/countly-vs-woopra.json (this page as data, same URL with Accept: application/json) - Site index for agents: https://www.anchorterminal.com/llms.txt (full text: https://www.anchorterminal.com/llms-full.txt) - API: https://www.anchorterminal.com/api/v1/index.json - Updated: 2026-10-09 Countly scores 54.8 (C) on agent readiness against Woopra's 44.4 (E), and leads in 5 of 7 scored categories. Woopra leads on reliability and payments & pricing. Both do analytics query. - Countly: grade C, 54.8/100, rank #607 of 842. Markdown https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/countly.md · JSON https://www.anchorterminal.com/api/v1/tools/countly.json - Woopra: grade E, 44.4/100, rank #779 of 842. Markdown https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/woopra.md · JSON https://www.anchorterminal.com/api/v1/tools/woopra.json ## Which one, for what ### Countly (C) Good for: An agent whose owner runs Countly on its own infrastructure or a dedicated Flex server and wants analytics, crash and remote-config data through MCP with per-category permissions. Ahead on: - Schema & documentation, 75 against 45 - Agent ergonomics, 66 against 45 - Security & auth, 63 against 22 - Maintenance & community, 80 against 9 - Transparency & trust, 70 against 61 Also in its favour: - Runs on your own machine - Open source Watch for: No public status page or incident history was found for Flex servers or for mcp.count.ly ### Woopra (E) Good for: An agent that reads a company's existing Woopra reports, looks up or edits customer profiles, or exports raw sessions on a schedule. Ahead on: - Reliability, 80 against 28 - Payments & pricing, 30 against 17 Watch for: Report endpoints run a report saved in the web app by `report_id`. No endpoint to define a query, funnel or segment was found in the reference ## Score by category | Category | Weight | Countly | Woopra | Edge | | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | | Reliability | 16% (20 this run) | 28 | 80 | Woopra +52 | | Performance | 10%, pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run | | Schema & documentation | 13% (16.2 this run) | 75 | 45 | Countly +30 | | Agent ergonomics | 13% (16.2 this run) | 66 | 45 | Countly +21 | | Security & auth | 14% (17.5 this run) | 63 | 22 | Countly +41 | | Payments & pricing | 10% (12.5 this run) | 17 | 30 | Woopra +13 | | Task success | 10%, pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run | | Maintenance & community | 7% (8.8 this run) | 80 | 9 | Countly +71 | | Transparency & trust | 7% (8.8 this run) | 70 | 61 | Countly +9 | | Negative events | ≤15 | 0 | 0 | | | **Total** | | **54.8 · C** | **44.4 · E** | | ## Facts side by side | Fact | Countly | Woopra | | --- | --- | --- | | Kind | HTTP API | HTTP API | | Vendor | Countly Ltd | Woopra, Inc. | | Hosted endpoint | `https://mcp.count.ly/mcp` | `https://www.woopra.com/rest/3.10` | | Transports | HTTP, stdio, Streamable HTTP | HTTP | | Auth | API key | OAuth or key | | Pricing | Paid | Paid | | x402 | no | no | | Licence | Countly Lite is AGPL-3.0 with added branding terms under Section 7. Enterprise plugins are proprietary. Flex is a hosted service under Countly's terms. The MCP server is MIT | Proprietary service under Woopra's terms of service. The browser tracker and the SDKs on GitHub are MIT, and the Node package is ISC | | Tools exposed | 209 | none | | Read-only variant documented | yes | no | | llms.txt | yes | yes | | Last release | 2026-10-07 | 2026-03-16 | | Terms last updated | 2026-09-25 | 2025-12-10 | | Privacy policy last updated | 2026-09-25 | 2025-08-01 | | Customer content may train models | not found in the text | not found in the text | | Terms restrict automated access | not found in the text | yes | | Terms restrict benchmarking | not found in the text | not found in the text | | Terms or service can change without notice | yes | not found in the text | | Arbitration or class-action waiver | not found in the text | yes | | Popularity | 28k npm/wk | 415 npm/wk | ## Verdicts **Countly.** Countly suits an agent working against a server its owner already runs. The official MCP server filters its 209 tools by edition, plugin and permission and has per-category read-only settings. No status page, OpenAPI document or published API rate limit was found, and the Flex trial needs a credit card. **Woopra.** Woopra's REST API returns saved Trends, Journeys, Retention and Attribution reports, profiles and raw session logs, with published limits of 300 calls a minute and 3,000 a day per project. A report must first be built in the web app, the tracking endpoints accept events without a secret by default, and no changelog or SLA was found. ## Before you call either ### Countly 1. Create a dedicated token in the Token Manager, limited to the apps and endpoints the task needs, and send it in the `countly-token` header, not the URL 2. Set `COUNTLY_TOOLS_ALL=R` unless the task needs writes. The token's own permissions still apply and the stricter of the two wins 3. Call `apps_list` first. Most tools need `app_id` or an exact `app_name` 4. Check `get_version` for the detected edition before planning funnel, retention or cohort queries, which need Enterprise plugins 5. Set `ENABLE_ANALYTICS=false` to stop usage reports to stats.count.ly, and prefer the stdio server to mcp.count.ly so the server URL and token stay local ### Woopra 1. Ask the owner to build and save each report in the web app first, then pass the last path segment of its URL as `report_id` 2. Authenticate REST calls with HTTP Basic, using the App ID and Secret Key from the Access Keys tab, against `https://www.woopra.com/rest/3.10/` 3. Stay under 300 calls a minute, 600 an hour and 3,000 a day per project. A 429 carries no documented retry interval, so back off on your own schedule 4. Reuse the `snapshot` ID from the first response when paging with `offset`, or pages past 1,000 records may not agree 5. Send `cookie` or a `cv_` identifier such as `cv_email` on every track call. Without one the event lands on a random profile that can't be identified later 6. When reading `/logs/export`, delete the profile named in each `type: "delete"` line. The following lines log its data again under `new_id` ## Questions ### Which is better for AI agents, Countly or Woopra? Countly scores 54.8 (C) on agent readiness against Woopra's 44.4 (E), and leads in 5 of 7 scored categories. Woopra leads on reliability and payments & pricing. ### Do Countly and Woopra need an API key? Countly needs an API key. Woopra takes an API key or an OAuth sign-in. ### Can an agent call Countly and Woopra without installing anything? Yes. Countly has a hosted endpoint at https://mcp.count.ly/mcp and Woopra at https://www.woopra.com/rest/3.10. ### Are Countly and Woopra open source? Countly is open source (Countly Lite is AGPL-3.0 with added branding terms under Section 7. Enterprise plugins are proprietary. Flex is a hosted service under Countly's terms. The MCP server is MIT). No open-source release is listed for Woopra. ## For agents - This comparison as JSON: https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/countly-vs-woopra.json, and with the fewest tokens: https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/countly-vs-woopra.min.md - Over MCP at https://www.anchorterminal.com/mcp (no key): `compare_tools {"a": "countly", "b": "woopra"}`. From a terminal: `anchor compare countly woopra` - Each listing in full: https://www.anchorterminal.com/api/v1/tools/countly.json and https://www.anchorterminal.com/api/v1/tools/woopra.json ## Other comparisons with Countly or Woopra - [Amplitude vs Countly](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/amplitude-vs-countly.md) - [Amplitude vs Woopra](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/amplitude-vs-woopra.md) - [Countly vs Fullstory](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/countly-vs-fullstory.md) - [Countly vs GrowthBook](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/countly-vs-growthbook.md) - [Countly vs Mixpanel](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/countly-vs-mixpanel.md) - [Countly vs Optimizely Experimentation](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/countly-vs-optimizely.md) - [Countly vs Pendo](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/countly-vs-pendo.md) - [Countly vs PostHog](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/countly-vs-posthog.md) - [Countly vs Statsig](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/countly-vs-statsig.md) - [Fullstory vs Woopra](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/fullstory-vs-woopra.md) - [GrowthBook vs Woopra](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/growthbook-vs-woopra.md) - [Mixpanel vs Woopra](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/mixpanel-vs-woopra.md) - [Optimizely Experimentation vs Woopra](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/optimizely-vs-woopra.md) - [Pendo vs Woopra](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/pendo-vs-woopra.md) - [PostHog vs Woopra](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/posthog-vs-woopra.md) - [Statsig vs Woopra](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/statsig-vs-woopra.md) - [Countly vs Heap](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/countly-vs-heap.md) - [Heap vs Woopra](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/heap-vs-woopra.md) - [Countly vs LaunchDarkly](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/countly-vs-launchdarkly.md)