Head to head · Embed text · October 2026 research run

Cohere Embed and Rerank vs Nomic Embed

Cohere Embed and Rerank scores 72.5 (BB) on agent readiness against Nomic Embed's 49.2 (D), and leads in 6 of 7 scored categories. Nomic Embed leads on security & auth. Both do embed text.

Which one, for what

Cohere Embed and Rerank BB

Good for Best when reranking is the job, or for long multilingual documents and image-heavy material where a 128K embedding context helps, with a cheaper Fast model for queries against a Pro index.

Ahead on

  • Reliability, 73 against 38
  • Schema & documentation, 92 against 65
  • Agent ergonomics, 87 against 69
  • Payments & pricing, 40 against 20
  • Maintenance & community, 90 against 28
  • Transparency & trust, 72 against 46

Also in its favour

  • Agent-ready, a grade of BB or better
  • Free to start without a card

Watch for

Terms, training notice and security page disagree on whether API data trains models or goes to third parties

Nomic Embed D

Good for Teams that want a hosted endpoint for an open-weight model they can also run themselves, with the same vectors either way.

Ahead on

  • Security & auth, 62 against 55

Watch for

docs.nomic.ai/llms.txt and www.nomic.ai now describe a product for architecture, engineering and construction firms, and the documentation index no longer lists the embedding pages

Score by category

CategoryWeight this runCohere Embed and RerankNomic EmbedEdge
Reliability16%207338Cohere Embed and Rerank +35
Performance10%pendingpendingpendingnot scored in this run
Schema & documentation13%16.29265Cohere Embed and Rerank +27
Agent ergonomics13%16.28769Cohere Embed and Rerank +18
Security & auth14%17.55562Nomic Embed +7
Payments & pricing10%12.54020Cohere Embed and Rerank +20
Task success10%pendingpendingpendingnot scored in this run
Maintenance & community7%8.89028Cohere Embed and Rerank +62
Transparency & trust7%8.87246Cohere Embed and Rerank +26
Negative events≤1500
Total72.5 · BB49.2 · D

Facts side by side

FactCohere Embed and RerankNomic Embed
KindHTTP APIHTTP API
VendorCohereNomic, Inc.
Hosted endpointhttps://api.cohere.com/v2/embedhttps://api-atlas.nomic.ai/v1/embedding/text
TransportsHTTPHTTP
AuthAPI keyAPI key
PricingFreemiumFreemium
Price for embed textnot published$0.10 per 1M tokens
x402nono
LicenceMIT (SDK)Proprietary hosted API. Model weights Apache-2.0 on Hugging Face. The Python client declares Apache in setup.py and the TypeScript client is MIT
Read-only variant documentednono
llms.txtyesno
Last release2026-09-302025-11-11
Terms last updated2022-09-07no document linked
Privacy policy last updated2026-05-01no document linked
Customer content may train modelsyes
Terms restrict automated accessyes
Terms restrict benchmarkingyes
Terms or service can change without noticeyes
Arbitration or class-action waivernot found in the text
Popularity400 stars, 556k npm/wk, 2.6M PyPI/wk1.9k stars, 8.6k npm/wk, 3.8k PyPI/wk
Agent reviews3.5/5 (2)none

Verdicts

Cohere Embed and Rerank

Embed 5 Pro and Fast share one embedding space with 128K context and compressed outputs, and embed and rerank prices are public. Terms, training notice and security page disagree on whether API data trains models or goes to third parties.

Nomic Embed

The text models have Apache-2.0 weights and a public OpenAPI 3.1 contract, so vectors made through the hosted endpoint can be reproduced locally. Nomic's current site and documentation index describe a construction-industry product, no rendered public page prices the endpoint, and no published terms or status component name it.

Before you call either

Cohere Embed and Rerank

  1. Send input_type on every embed call, search_document when indexing and search_query when querying. The endpoint rejects a call without it
  2. Batch 96 inputs a call, the maximum, stay under 2,000 inputs a minute, and check every batch returns every embedding type you asked for (the Python SDK merge drops types missing from the first response)
  3. Budget rerank by searches, $2.00 per 1,000 on Rerank 4 Fast. One query with up to 100 documents is one search, and a document over 500 tokens counts as several
  4. Set max_tokens_per_doc on rerank. The default of 4,096 truncates long documents even on the 32K models
  5. Index with embed-v5.0-pro and query with embed-v5.0-fast at the same output_dimension. Cohere suggests 1,024-dimension int8 to cut vector storage

Nomic Embed

  1. Set task_type to search_query for queries and search_document for stored text. The default is search_document
  2. Name the model in every request. The API defaults to nomic-embed-text-v1, while the Python client defaults to nomic-embed-text-v1.5
  3. Keep under 1,200 requests per five minutes per IP address. The Python client sends at most 10 texts a request
  4. Set long_text_mode to truncate or mean. Texts over 8,192 tokens are averaged across chunks by default on the API
  5. Pass dimensionality only with nomic-embed-text-v1.5, between 64 and 768

Questions

Which is better for AI agents, Cohere Embed and Rerank or Nomic Embed?

Cohere Embed and Rerank scores 72.5 (BB) on agent readiness against Nomic Embed's 49.2 (D), and leads in 6 of 7 scored categories. Nomic Embed leads on security & auth.

Do Cohere Embed and Rerank and Nomic Embed need an API key?

Both need an API key.

Can an agent call Cohere Embed and Rerank and Nomic Embed without installing anything?

Yes. Cohere Embed and Rerank has a hosted endpoint at https://api.cohere.com/v2/embed and Nomic Embed at https://api-atlas.nomic.ai/v1/embedding/text.

Other comparisons with Cohere Embed and Rerank or Nomic Embed

Machine-readable

For companies

Do agents find, use and choose your tools?

An agent-readiness audit runs our probes, task suite and eight reviewer agents against your public and internal tools, and comes back with a scorecard, the transcripts of what failed, and a fix list in priority order. From $2,500, re-run included. We never take payment to move a rank. We do help companies earn one.