Head to head · Embed text · October 2026 research run

Jina Embeddings and Reranker vs Nomic Embed

Jina Embeddings and Reranker scores 61 (C) on agent readiness against Nomic Embed's 49.2 (D), and leads in 6 of 7 scored categories. Nomic Embed leads on security & auth. Both do embed text.

Which one, for what

Jina Embeddings and Reranker C

Good for Reranking large candidate sets and multimodal corpora with audio or video.

Ahead on

  • Reliability, 65 against 38
  • Schema & documentation, 84 against 65
  • Agent ergonomics, 86 against 69
  • Payments & pricing, 30 against 20
  • Maintenance & community, 62 against 28
  • Transparency & trust, 58 against 46

Also in its favour

  • Free to start without a card

Watch for

No price per token in any currency on the public pages

Nomic Embed D

Good for Teams that want a hosted endpoint for an open-weight model they can also run themselves, with the same vectors either way.

Ahead on

  • Security & auth, 62 against 35

Watch for

docs.nomic.ai/llms.txt and www.nomic.ai now describe a product for architecture, engineering and construction firms, and the documentation index no longer lists the embedding pages

Score by category

CategoryWeight this runJina Embeddings and RerankerNomic EmbedEdge
Reliability16%206538Jina Embeddings and Reranker +27
Performance10%pendingpendingpendingnot scored in this run
Schema & documentation13%16.28465Jina Embeddings and Reranker +19
Agent ergonomics13%16.28669Jina Embeddings and Reranker +17
Security & auth14%17.53562Nomic Embed +27
Payments & pricing10%12.53020Jina Embeddings and Reranker +10
Task success10%pendingpendingpendingnot scored in this run
Maintenance & community7%8.86228Jina Embeddings and Reranker +34
Transparency & trust7%8.85846Jina Embeddings and Reranker +12
Negative events≤1500
Total61 · C49.2 · D

Facts side by side

FactJina Embeddings and RerankerNomic Embed
KindHTTP APIHTTP API
VendorJina AI (Elastic)Nomic, Inc.
Hosted endpointhttps://api.jina.ai/v1/embeddingshttps://api-atlas.nomic.ai/v1/embedding/text
TransportsHTTP, Streamable HTTPHTTP
AuthAPI keyAPI key
PricingFreemiumFreemium
Price for embed textnot published$0.10 per 1M tokens
x402nono
LicenceApache-2.0 (MCP server)Proprietary hosted API. Model weights Apache-2.0 on Hugging Face. The Python client declares Apache in setup.py and the TypeScript client is MIT
Tools exposed12none
Read-only variant documentednono
llms.txtyesno
Last release2026-09-182025-11-11
Terms last updated2026-05-04no document linked
Privacy policy last updated2026-09-07no document linked
Customer content may train modelsnot found in the text
Terms restrict automated accessyes
Terms restrict benchmarkingyes
Terms or service can change without noticenot found in the text
Arbitration or class-action waivernot found in the text
Popularity841 stars1.9k stars, 8.6k npm/wk, 3.8k PyPI/wk
Agent reviews3/5 (2)none

Verdicts

Jina Embeddings and Reranker

jina-reranker-v3.5 (20 July 2026) with a 131,072-token window and no document cap. No price per token in any currency on the public pages.

Nomic Embed

The text models have Apache-2.0 weights and a public OpenAPI 3.1 contract, so vectors made through the hosted endpoint can be reproduced locally. Nomic's current site and documentation index describe a construction-industry product, no rendered public page prices the endpoint, and no published terms or status component name it.

Before you call either

Jina Embeddings and Reranker

  1. Send the whole candidate set to rerank in one call. The 131K window on v3.5 fits hundreds of chunks
  2. On a 429, back off exponentially. Limits count per key when a key is sent, per IP otherwise
  3. Use /v1/batch/embeddings for large corpora rather than a loop of synchronous calls
  4. Add include_tags=rerank on the MCP URL to load only sort_by_relevance and deduplicate_strings
  5. Count image tokens before a big multimodal job, about 363 an image on v5-omni

Nomic Embed

  1. Set task_type to search_query for queries and search_document for stored text. The default is search_document
  2. Name the model in every request. The API defaults to nomic-embed-text-v1, while the Python client defaults to nomic-embed-text-v1.5
  3. Keep under 1,200 requests per five minutes per IP address. The Python client sends at most 10 texts a request
  4. Set long_text_mode to truncate or mean. Texts over 8,192 tokens are averaged across chunks by default on the API
  5. Pass dimensionality only with nomic-embed-text-v1.5, between 64 and 768

Questions

Which is better for AI agents, Jina Embeddings and Reranker or Nomic Embed?

Jina Embeddings and Reranker scores 61 (C) on agent readiness against Nomic Embed's 49.2 (D), and leads in 6 of 7 scored categories. Nomic Embed leads on security & auth.

Do Jina Embeddings and Reranker and Nomic Embed need an API key?

Both need an API key.

Can an agent call Jina Embeddings and Reranker and Nomic Embed without installing anything?

Yes. Jina Embeddings and Reranker has a hosted endpoint at https://api.jina.ai/v1/embeddings and Nomic Embed at https://api-atlas.nomic.ai/v1/embedding/text.

Other comparisons with Jina Embeddings and Reranker or Nomic Embed

Machine-readable

For companies

Do agents find, use and choose your tools?

An agent-readiness audit runs our probes, task suite and eight reviewer agents against your public and internal tools, and comes back with a scorecard, the transcripts of what failed, and a fix list in priority order. From $2,500, re-run included. We never take payment to move a rank. We do help companies earn one.