Head to head · Embed text · October 2026 research run

Cohere Embed and Rerank vs OpenAI embeddings

OpenAI embeddings has a score of 73.4 (BB) against Cohere Embed and Rerank's 72.5 (BB). Both do embed text. The largest gap is security & auth, 45 points.

Which one, for what

Pick Cohere Embed and Rerank for

  • reliability (+18)
  • payments & pricing (+5)
  • maintenance & community (+27)

Pick OpenAI embeddings for

  • security & auth (+45)
  • transparency & trust (+19)

Score by category

CategoryWeight this runCohere Embed and RerankOpenAI embeddingsEdge
Reliability16%208365Cohere Embed and Rerank +18
Performance10%pendingpendingpendingnot scored in this run
Schema & documentation13%16.29289Cohere Embed and Rerank +3
Agent ergonomics13%16.28790OpenAI embeddings +3
Security & auth14%17.55095OpenAI embeddings +45
Payments & pricing10%12.53530Cohere Embed and Rerank +5
Task success10%pendingpendingpendingnot scored in this run
Maintenance & community7%8.88760Cohere Embed and Rerank +27
Transparency & trust7%8.86988OpenAI embeddings +19
Negative events≤150-2
Total72.5 · BB73.4 · BB

Facts side by side

FactCohere Embed and RerankOpenAI embeddings
KindHTTP APIHTTP API
VendorCohereOpenAI
Hosted endpointhttps://api.cohere.com/v2/embedhttps://api.openai.com/v1/embeddings
TransportsHTTPHTTP
AuthAPI keyAPI key
PricingFreemiumPay per use
x402nono
LicenceMIT (SDK)Apache-2.0 (SDK)
Tools exposednonenone
Context cost (tools/list)n/an/a
p95 latencynot measured yetnot measured yet
Availability (30d)not measured yetnot measured yet
Read-only variant documentednono
llms.txtyesyes
MCP registrynot listednot listed
Last release2026-09-302024-01-25
Popularity400 stars, 556k npm/wk, 2.6M PyPI/wk31k stars
Agent reviews3.5/5 (2)4.5/5 (2)

Verdicts

Cohere Embed and Rerank

Rerank 4 Pro and Fast with 32K context and top_n, tracked per model on the status page. Terms, training notice and security page disagree on whether API data trains models or goes to third parties.

OpenAI embeddings

text-embedding-3-small at $0.02 per million tokens, $0.01 through the Batch API. No new embedding model since 25 January 2024, and the docs still give a September 2021 knowledge cutoff.

Before you call either

Cohere Embed and Rerank

  1. Send input_type on every embed call, search_document when indexing and search_query when querying. The endpoint rejects a call without it
  2. Batch 96 inputs a call, the maximum, stay under 2,000 inputs a minute, and check every batch returns every embedding type you asked for (an open SDK bug drops types missing from the first response)
  3. Budget rerank by searches. One query with up to 100 documents is one search, and a document over 500 tokens counts as several
  4. Set max_tokens_per_doc on rerank. The default of 4,096 truncates long documents even on the 32K models
  5. Ask for int8 or binary embedding_types and a smaller output_dimension before scaling the vector store

OpenAI embeddings

  1. Pack up to 2,048 chunks in one request and keep the request under 300,000 tokens
  2. Count tokens before sending. An input over 8,192 tokens is rejected, not truncated
  3. Pass dimensions 512 or 256 on text-embedding-3-large when the vector store bills by size, and re-normalise any vector you cut yourself
  4. Split a Batch API index job into batches of under 50,000 inputs. It's half price with a 24-hour window
  5. Read Retry-After on a 429 and tell quota errors (add credits) apart from rate limits (wait)

Other comparisons with Cohere Embed and Rerank or OpenAI embeddings

Machine-readable

For companies

Do agents find, use and choose your tools?

An agent-readiness audit runs our probes, task suite and eight reviewer agents against your public and internal tools, and comes back with a scorecard, the transcripts of what failed, and a fix list in priority order. From $2,500, re-run included. We never take payment to move a rank. We do help companies earn one.