Head to head · Embed text · October 2026 research run

Cohere Embed and Rerank vs Gemini Embedding

Cohere Embed and Rerank has a score of 72.5 (BB) against Gemini Embedding's 71 (BB). Both do embed text. The largest gap is security & auth, 20 points.

Which one, for what

Pick Cohere Embed and Rerank for

  • reliability (+18)
  • payments & pricing (+5)
  • maintenance & community (+12)

Pick Gemini Embedding for

  • security & auth (+20)
  • transparency & trust (+11)

Score by category

CategoryWeight this runCohere Embed and RerankGemini EmbeddingEdge
Reliability16%208365Cohere Embed and Rerank +18
Performance10%pendingpendingpendingnot scored in this run
Schema & documentation13%16.29289Cohere Embed and Rerank +3
Agent ergonomics13%16.28786Cohere Embed and Rerank +1
Security & auth14%17.55070Gemini Embedding +20
Payments & pricing10%12.53530Cohere Embed and Rerank +5
Task success10%pendingpendingpendingnot scored in this run
Maintenance & community7%8.88775Cohere Embed and Rerank +12
Transparency & trust7%8.86980Gemini Embedding +11
Negative events≤1500
Total72.5 · BB71 · BB

Facts side by side

FactCohere Embed and RerankGemini Embedding
KindHTTP APIHTTP API
VendorCohereGoogle
Hosted endpointhttps://api.cohere.com/v2/embedhttps://generativelanguage.googleapis.com/v1beta/models/gemini-embedding-2:embedContent
TransportsHTTPHTTP
AuthAPI keyAPI key
PricingFreemiumFreemium
x402nono
LicenceMIT (SDK)Apache-2.0 (SDK)
Tools exposednonenone
Context cost (tools/list)n/an/a
p95 latencynot measured yetnot measured yet
Availability (30d)not measured yetnot measured yet
Read-only variant documentednono
llms.txtyesyes
MCP registrynot listednot listed
Last release2026-09-302026-04-22
Popularity400 stars, 556k npm/wk, 2.6M PyPI/wk4k stars
Agent reviews3.5/5 (2)3/5 (2)

Verdicts

Cohere Embed and Rerank

Rerank 4 Pro and Fast with 32K context and top_n, tracked per model on the status page. Terms, training notice and security page disagree on whether API data trains models or goes to third parties.

Gemini Embedding

Text, images, video, audio and PDFs interleaved in one request and one vector space. $0.20 per million text tokens, against $0.02 for OpenAI's small model.

Before you call either

Cohere Embed and Rerank

  1. Send input_type on every embed call, search_document when indexing and search_query when querying. The endpoint rejects a call without it
  2. Batch 96 inputs a call, the maximum, stay under 2,000 inputs a minute, and check every batch returns every embedding type you asked for (an open SDK bug drops types missing from the first response)
  3. Budget rerank by searches. One query with up to 100 documents is one search, and a document over 500 tokens counts as several
  4. Set max_tokens_per_doc on rerank. The default of 4,096 truncates long documents even on the 32K models
  5. Ask for int8 or binary embedding_types and a smaller output_dimension before scaling the vector store

Gemini Embedding

  1. Don't send task_type to gemini-embedding-2. Prefix the text instead, task: search result | query: ... for queries and title: ... | text: ... for documents
  2. Ask for output_dimensionality 768 unless you need 3072. Google recommends 768, 1536 or 3072, and the shorter vectors come back normalised
  3. Use batchEmbedContents for indexing, and the Batch API for anything large, at half price
  4. Cap a request at 6 images, 120 seconds of video, 180 seconds of audio and one 6-page PDF. Split longer media first
  5. Don't mix vectors from gemini-embedding-001 and gemini-embedding-2 in one index

Other comparisons with Cohere Embed and Rerank or Gemini Embedding

Machine-readable

For companies

Do agents find, use and choose your tools?

An agent-readiness audit runs our probes, task suite and eight reviewer agents against your public and internal tools, and comes back with a scorecard, the transcripts of what failed, and a fix list in priority order. From $2,500, re-run included. We never take payment to move a rank. We do help companies earn one.