Head to head · Sheets records · October 2026 research run
Baserow vs SeaTable
SeaTable scores 66.3 (B) on agent readiness against Baserow's 63.6 (B), and leads in 6 of 7 scored categories. Baserow leads on payments & pricing. Both do sheets records.
Which one, for what
Baserow B
Good for Teams that want Airtable-style typed tables they can also self-host, with row-level reads and writes by an agent through table-scoped tokens or a small MCP tool set.
Ahead on
- Payments & pricing, 40 against 30
Also in its favour
- Open source
Watch for
The MCP endpoint's key sits in the URL path, and the docs say it grants full access to modify data in the workspace
SeaTable B
Good for Teams that want typed tables hosted in Germany or on their own server, with an agent reading and writing rows through a per-base token or the official MCP server.
Ahead on
- Security & auth, 59 against 54
- Transparency & trust, 75 against 65
Also in its favour
- Runs on your own machine
Watch for
Monthly API call quotas by plan, 3,000 for a whole Free team, 10,000 per user on Plus and 50,000 per user on Enterprise
Score by category
| Category | Weight this run | Baserow | SeaTable | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Reliability | 16%20 | 65 | 69 | SeaTable +4 |
| Performance | 10%pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |
| Schema & documentation | 13%16.2 | 77 | 81 | SeaTable +4 |
| Agent ergonomics | 13%16.2 | 72 | 74 | SeaTable +2 |
| Security & auth | 14%17.5 | 54 | 59 | SeaTable +5 |
| Payments & pricing | 10%12.5 | 40 | 30 | Baserow +10 |
| Task success | 10%pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |
| Maintenance & community | 7%8.8 | 72 | 76 | SeaTable +4 |
| Transparency & trust | 7%8.8 | 65 | 75 | SeaTable +10 |
| Negative events | ≤15 | 0 | 0 | |
| Total | 63.6 · B | 66.3 · B |
Facts side by side
| Fact | Baserow | SeaTable |
|---|---|---|
| Kind | HTTP API | HTTP API |
| Vendor | Baserow B.V. | SeaTable GmbH |
| Hosted endpoint | https://api.baserow.io | https://cloud.seatable.io |
| Transports | HTTP, SSE (legacy) | HTTP, stdio |
| Auth | API key | API key |
| Pricing | Freemium | Freemium |
| x402 | no | no |
| Licence | MIT for the core, including the REST API and the MCP server. Code under premium/ and enterprise/ is source-available under Baserow's own licences and needs a paid subscription in production. Docs are CC BY-SA 4.0 | Proprietary cloud service under the Terms of Service for SeaTable Cloud. The MCP server is MIT. SeaTable Server Enterprise Edition is licensed under an EULA |
| Tools exposed | 7 | 21 |
| Read-only variant documented | no | yes |
| llms.txt | yes | yes |
| MCP registry | not listed | io.github.seatable/seatable |
| Last release | 2026-09-29 | 2026-09-04 |
| Terms last updated | no date given | no date given |
| Privacy policy last updated | no date given | no date given |
| Customer content may train models | not found in the text | not found in the text |
| Terms restrict automated access | not found in the text | not found in the text |
| Terms restrict benchmarking | not found in the text | not found in the text |
| Terms or service can change without notice | not found in the text | yes |
| Arbitration or class-action waiver | not found in the text | not found in the text |
| Popularity | 6.1k stars | 103 npm/wk, 1.7k PyPI/wk |
Verdicts
Baserow
Database tokens are limited to chosen tables and to create, read, update or delete, and the REST API has a public OpenAPI description with batch calls of 200 rows. The MCP server authenticates with a key in its URL, runs over SSE only and has no read-only mode. Cloud requests are capped at 10 at a time.
SeaTable
API tokens are limited to one base and to read-only or read-write, and the official MCP server marks every tool as read-only or destructive. The Free plan allows 3,000 API calls a month in total, and base calls are capped at 200 a minute. The status page showed the base API degraded for 0.77 per cent of 30 days.
Before you call either
Baserow
- Create a database token with only the tables and operations needed. It can't change tables or fields, which need a JWT from
/api/user/token-auth/ - Send
Authorization: Token YOUR_DATABASE_TOKEN, and adduser_field_names=trueor rows come back keyed asfield_123 - Use the
/batch/endpoints for up to 200 rows a call, and keep to 10 requests in flight on Baserow Cloud - Treat the MCP URL as a password. Keep it out of logs and version control, and delete the endpoint to revoke it
- Over MCP, call
get_table_schemabeforecreate_rowsorupdate_rows, and pagelist_table_rowswithpageandsize
SeaTable
- Create an API token for the one base with read-only permission unless writes are needed, then exchange it at
/api/v2.1/dtable/app-access-token/for a Base-Token - Renew the Base-Token before it expires after 3 days, and send it as
Authorization: Bearerto/api-gateway/api/v2/dtables/{base_uuid}/ - Read
x-ratelimit-remainingandx-ratelimit-reseton every base call. SeaTable Cloud allows 200 base calls a minute and answers 429 with no body - Batch writes to save the monthly quota. One call appends or updates up to 1,000 rows over REST and 100 over MCP
- Over MCP, prefer
update_rowsanddelete_rowstoquery_sql, which can run UPDATE and DELETE, and callget_schemabefore writing
Questions
Which is better for AI agents, Baserow or SeaTable?
SeaTable scores 66.3 (B) on agent readiness against Baserow's 63.6 (B), and leads in 6 of 7 scored categories. Baserow leads on payments & pricing.
Do Baserow and SeaTable need an API key?
Both need an API key.
Can an agent call Baserow and SeaTable without installing anything?
Yes. Baserow has a hosted endpoint at https://api.baserow.io and SeaTable at https://cloud.seatable.io.
Are Baserow and SeaTable open source?
Baserow is open source (MIT for the core, including the REST API and the MCP server. Code under premium/ and enterprise/ is source-available under Baserow's own licences and needs a paid subscription in production. Docs are CC BY-SA 4.0). No open-source release is listed for SeaTable.
Other comparisons with Baserow or SeaTable
- Baserow vs Google Sheets API
- Baserow vs Microsoft Excel (Microsoft Graph workbook API)
- Coda (Superhuman Docs) vs SeaTable
- Google Sheets API vs SeaTable
- Microsoft Excel (Microsoft Graph workbook API) vs SeaTable
- Airtable vs Baserow
- Airtable vs SeaTable
- Baserow vs Coda (Superhuman Docs)
- Baserow vs Grist
- Baserow vs NocoDB
- Baserow vs Smartsheet API + MCP
- Baserow vs Teable
- Grist vs SeaTable
- NocoDB vs SeaTable
- SeaTable vs Smartsheet API + MCP
- SeaTable vs Teable
Machine-readable
- This page as Markdown
/compare/baserow-vs-seatable.md· slim.min.md· JSON.json(or sendAccept: text/markdown) - Each listing in full
/api/v1/tools/baserow.json·/api/v1/tools/seatable.json - From a terminal
anchor compare baserow seatable(the CLI) - Over MCP
compare_tools {"a": "baserow", "b": "seatable"}at/mcp, no key