Head to head · Sheets records · October 2026 research run
Grist vs SeaTable
SeaTable scores 66.3 (B) on agent readiness against Grist's 50.1 (D), and leads in 4 of 7 scored categories. Both do sheets records.
Which one, for what
Grist D
Good for Teams that want a relational spreadsheet with Python formulas and per-document OAuth grants for an agent, or that need to self-host.
Also in its favour
- Open source
Watch for
No status page was found. status.getgrist.com redirects to a signup form, and the site footer and help centre link to none
SeaTable B
Good for Teams that want typed tables hosted in Germany or on their own server, with an agent reading and writing rows through a per-base token or the official MCP server.
Ahead on
- Reliability, 69 against 39
- Schema & documentation, 81 against 63
- Agent ergonomics, 74 against 57
- Transparency & trust, 75 against 61
Also in its favour
- Runs on your own machine
- No incidents deducted, where Grist loses 4 points for them
Watch for
Monthly API call quotas by plan, 3,000 for a whole Free team, 10,000 per user on Plus and 50,000 per user on Enterprise
Score by category
| Category | Weight this run | Grist | SeaTable | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Reliability | 16%20 | 39 | 69 | SeaTable +30 |
| Performance | 10%pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |
| Schema & documentation | 13%16.2 | 63 | 81 | SeaTable +18 |
| Agent ergonomics | 13%16.2 | 57 | 74 | SeaTable +17 |
| Security & auth | 14%17.5 | 62 | 59 | Grist +3 |
| Payments & pricing | 10%12.5 | 30 | 30 | even |
| Task success | 10%pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |
| Maintenance & community | 7%8.8 | 78 | 76 | Grist +2 |
| Transparency & trust | 7%8.8 | 61 | 75 | SeaTable +14 |
| Negative events | ≤15 | -4 | 0 | |
| Total | 50.1 · D | 66.3 · B |
Facts side by side
| Fact | Grist | SeaTable |
|---|---|---|
| Kind | HTTP API | HTTP API |
| Vendor | Grist Labs Inc. | SeaTable GmbH |
| Hosted endpoint | https://docs.getgrist.com/api | https://cloud.seatable.io |
| Transports | HTTP, Streamable HTTP | HTTP, stdio |
| Auth | OAuth or key | API key |
| Pricing | Freemium | Freemium |
| x402 | no | no |
| Licence | Apache-2.0 for the community edition in gristlabs/grist-core. The full edition, which adds the MCP server, the OAuth server and audit log streaming, is proprietary and needs an activation key after a 30-day trial. Docs are CC BY-SA 4.0 | Proprietary cloud service under the Terms of Service for SeaTable Cloud. The MCP server is MIT. SeaTable Server Enterprise Edition is licensed under an EULA |
| Tools exposed | 34 | 21 |
| Read-only variant documented | yes | yes |
| llms.txt | no | yes |
| MCP registry | not listed | io.github.seatable/seatable |
| Last release | 2026-09-28 | 2026-09-04 |
| Terms last updated | no date given | no date given |
| Privacy policy last updated | 2019-04-01 | no date given |
| Customer content may train models | not found in the text | not found in the text |
| Terms restrict automated access | not found in the text | not found in the text |
| Terms restrict benchmarking | not found in the text | not found in the text |
| Terms or service can change without notice | yes | yes |
| Arbitration or class-action waiver | not found in the text | not found in the text |
| Popularity | 12k stars, 341 npm/wk, 240 PyPI/wk | 103 npm/wk, 1.7k PyPI/wk |
Verdicts
Grist
OAuth tokens carry seven scopes, can be limited to chosen documents and expire after an hour, and the REST API has a public OpenAPI file with an add-or-update call. No status page, SLA terms, DPA or security.txt was found, and the docs say the hosted service has no SOC 2 or ISO 27001 audit.
SeaTable
API tokens are limited to one base and to read-only or read-write, and the official MCP server marks every tool as read-only or destructive. The Free plan allows 3,000 API calls a month in total, and base calls are capped at 200 a minute. The status page showed the base API degraded for 0.77 per cent of 30 days.
Before you call either
Grist
- Connect through OAuth, not an API key. Ask for
doc:readalone for reading, and have the user pick Selected resources on the consent screen - Keep
doc.schema:writeoff unless needed. The docs say formula editing lets its holder read any data in the document whatever the access rules - Send requests for one document one at a time. The eleventh concurrent request gets 429, and no Retry-After header is documented
- Use
PUT /api/docs/{docId}/tables/{tableId}/recordswithrequireto add or update by key, so a retried write doesn't create a duplicate row - Use the
/recordsendpoints, not the deprecated/dataones, and split large writes to stay under the 1 MB body limit
SeaTable
- Create an API token for the one base with read-only permission unless writes are needed, then exchange it at
/api/v2.1/dtable/app-access-token/for a Base-Token - Renew the Base-Token before it expires after 3 days, and send it as
Authorization: Bearerto/api-gateway/api/v2/dtables/{base_uuid}/ - Read
x-ratelimit-remainingandx-ratelimit-reseton every base call. SeaTable Cloud allows 200 base calls a minute and answers 429 with no body - Batch writes to save the monthly quota. One call appends or updates up to 1,000 rows over REST and 100 over MCP
- Over MCP, prefer
update_rowsanddelete_rowstoquery_sql, which can run UPDATE and DELETE, and callget_schemabefore writing
Questions
Which is better for AI agents, Grist or SeaTable?
SeaTable scores 66.3 (B) on agent readiness against Grist's 50.1 (D), and leads in 4 of 7 scored categories.
Do Grist and SeaTable need an API key?
Grist takes an API key or an OAuth sign-in. SeaTable needs an API key.
Can an agent call Grist and SeaTable without installing anything?
Yes. Grist has a hosted endpoint at https://docs.getgrist.com/api and SeaTable at https://cloud.seatable.io.
Are Grist and SeaTable open source?
Grist is open source (Apache-2.0 for the community edition in gristlabs/grist-core. The full edition, which adds the MCP server, the OAuth server and audit log streaming, is proprietary and needs an activation key after a 30-day trial. Docs are CC BY-SA 4.0). No open-source release is listed for SeaTable.
Other comparisons with Grist or SeaTable
- Coda (Superhuman Docs) vs Grist
- Coda (Superhuman Docs) vs SeaTable
- Google Sheets API vs Grist
- Google Sheets API vs SeaTable
- Grist vs Microsoft Excel (Microsoft Graph workbook API)
- Microsoft Excel (Microsoft Graph workbook API) vs SeaTable
- Airtable vs Grist
- Airtable vs SeaTable
- Baserow vs Grist
- Baserow vs SeaTable
- Grist vs NocoDB
- Grist vs Smartsheet API + MCP
- Grist vs Teable
- NocoDB vs SeaTable
- SeaTable vs Smartsheet API + MCP
- SeaTable vs Teable
Machine-readable
- This page as Markdown
/compare/grist-vs-seatable.md· slim.min.md· JSON.json(or sendAccept: text/markdown) - Each listing in full
/api/v1/tools/grist.json·/api/v1/tools/seatable.json - From a terminal
anchor compare grist seatable(the CLI) - Over MCP
compare_tools {"a": "grist", "b": "seatable"}at/mcp, no key