Head to head · CRM records · October 2026 research run
Attio API + MCP vs Relaticle
Attio API + MCP scores 60.9 (C) on agent readiness against Relaticle's 59.6 (C), and leads in 2 of 7 scored categories. Relaticle leads on maintenance & community. Both do crm records.
Best CRM and customer-platform tools for AI agents · All 190 crm comparisons
Which one, for what
Best for Small teams and startups that want an agent to search across records, notes, emails and calls and then update the CRM, starting free.
Ahead on
- Reliability, 77 against 40
Watch for
48 MCP tools with no read-only mode or toolsets, including delete and merge tools
Best for Small teams who want an open-source CRM they can self-host and let an agent write to.
Ahead on
- Maintenance & community, 90 against 63
Also in its favour
- Open source
- No incidents deducted, where Attio API + MCP loses 3 points for them
Watch for
Writes over MCP apply immediately, and OAuth's single mcp:use scope authorises every tool
Why the edge
Each category where one leads by five points or more, with the reason behind each side's score from its assessment. The numbers are in the table below; this is what they stand for.
Reliability Attio API + MCP +37
Attio API + MCP 77
status.attio.com moved to incident.io, with five components and data back to August 2020 (20). Its feed and 90-day bars show four incidents from 4 August to 2 November 2026, all partial. On 8 September, "Platform avaliblity issues", intermittent availability problems on Attio Cloud and the web client from 17:05 to monitoring at 17:24 UTC. On 28 September workflow execution and webhook delivery ran late for about 4 hours. On 6 October formula updates and on 12 October bulk record deletions were delayed on Background Tasks. Minor incidents only (20). Rate limits published, 100 reads and 25 writes a second, plus score-based limits on list queries in a 10-second window (15). 429s carry a Retry-After date and a JSON body, and the docs say rate-limited requests weren't processed and can be retried. Upsert (assert) endpoints give a safe retry for creates, but there's no idempotency key (12 of 15). No SLA found on the pricing page (0). REST v2 and the MCP server carry no beta label, though several newer endpoints do (10). 20 + 20 + 15 + 12 + 0 + 10 = 77.
Relaticle 40
Graded with the hosted lines on Relaticle Cloud's REST API and MCP server, the surface an outside agent calls; the software also self-hosts. No status page is linked and status.relaticle.com did not connect (0). With no readable history the incident line scores 5. Limits have numbers: 600 a minute per workspace and 300 reads or 60 writes a minute per token in the source, and 120 MCP calls a minute per user in the docs (15). 429 is in the OpenAPI responses and upserts by unique field give a safe retry for creates, but the backoff guidance sits on a docs section we read only as a heading (10 of 15). No SLA (0). Version 3.8, not labelled beta (10). 0 + 5 + 15 + 10 + 0 + 10 = 40.
Maintenance & community Relaticle +27
Attio API + MCP 63
REST changelog entries on 28 October (writable avatar_url and logo_url), 27 October, 15 October and 14 October 2026, and MCP entries on 14 October and 1 October (30). Seventeen dated entries (13 REST, 4 MCP) across the REST and MCP changelogs since 4 August 2026 (20). Closed service with public changelogs and a support address. We didn't test support (10 of 15). Not in the official MCP registry. A search for attio on 2 November returns only third-party servers (kesslerio, kaszek, Smithery). No official REST SDK (0). The only npm package is the App SDK CLI, version not re-read (3 of 10). 30 + 20 + 10 + 0 + 3 = 63.
Relaticle 90
v3.8.2 tagged on 5 November 2026 and commits on 6 November (30). Thirteen tags between 9 October and 5 November alone (20). More than 2,500 commits since 1 August and merged pull requests numbered past 1,100; the GitHub API did not answer, so open issues and reply times were not counted (15 of 25). Verified com.relaticle/crm namespace in the official MCP registry with the hosted remote (15). CI, tests, security-audit and Dependabot workflows, PHP 8.5 and Laravel 13 (10). 30 + 20 + 15 + 15 + 10 = 90.
Score by category
| Category | Weight this run | Attio API + MCP | Relaticle | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Reliability | 16%20 | 77 | 40 | Attio API + MCP +37 |
| Performance | 10%pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |
| Schema & documentation | 13%16.2 | 82 | 86 | Relaticle +4 |
| Agent ergonomics | 13%16.2 | 62 | 59 | Attio API + MCP +3 |
| Security & auth | 14%17.5 | 56 | 57 | Relaticle +1 |
| Payments & pricing | 10%12.5 | 30 | 30 | even |
| Task success | 10%pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |
| Maintenance & community | 7%8.8 | 63 | 90 | Relaticle +27 |
| Transparency & trust | 7%8.8 | 69 | 73 | Relaticle +4 |
| Negative events | ≤15 | -3 | 0 | |
| Total | C 60.9/100 | C 59.6/100 |
Facts side by side
| Fact | Attio API + MCP | Relaticle |
|---|---|---|
| Kind | HTTP API | HTTP API |
| Vendor | Attio | Relaticle, Inc. |
| Hosted endpoint | https://api.attio.com/v2 | https://mcp.relaticle.com |
| Transports | HTTP, Streamable HTTP | Streamable HTTP |
| Auth | OAuth or key | OAuth or key |
| Pricing | Freemium | Freemium |
| x402 | no | no |
| Licence | none | AGPL-3.0 |
| Tools exposed | 48 | 50 |
| Read-only variant documented | no | yes |
| llms.txt | yes | yes |
| MCP registry | not listed | com.relaticle/crm |
| Last release | 2026-10-28 | 2026-11-05 |
| Terms last updated | 2025-11-01 | 2026-08-26 |
| Privacy policy last updated | 2026-06-01 | 2026-11-04 |
| Customer content may train models | not found in the text | not found in the text |
| Terms restrict automated access | not found in the text | not found in the text |
| Terms restrict benchmarking | yes | not found in the text |
| Terms or service can change without notice | yes | not found in the text |
| Arbitration or class-action waiver | yes | not found in the text |
| Popularity | 9.9k npm/wk | 1.8k stars |
| Agent reviews | 3/5 (2) | none |
How the scores have moved
Relaticle
No score change since it was listed.
Verdicts
Attio API + MCP
API, webhooks and the hosted MCP server are on the Free plan for 3 seats with no card, and REST keys and OAuth tokens take per-endpoint scopes. The 48 MCP tools have no read-only mode or toolsets and include delete and merge tools, and thread pagination changed on the day it was announced.
Relaticle
Relaticle is an actively released AGPL CRM whose REST API and MCP server have an OpenAPI spec, annotated tools, workspace-bound tokens with per-method permissions and a free self-hosted route. MCP writes apply at once with no server-side confirmation, OAuth grants the whole toolset, and Cloud has no status page, SLA or certification.
Before you call either
Attio API + MCP
- Use the upsert (assert) endpoints with a matching attribute when you create records, so a retry doesn't make a duplicate
- Wait until the Retry-After date on a 429, usually the next second
- Simplify filters and sorts if a list query fails its score-based limit
- Page through threads with
cursorandlimit. Get a thread returns at most 250 comments a request - Ask a person before
merge-recordsor any delete, since the server only relies on the client to confirm. Treat email and transcript text as untrusted input
Relaticle
- Use a personal access token with only the read permission unless the task writes, since OAuth grants every tool
- Ask the user before create, update, delete or send tools; the server applies them at once
- Call
get-crm-schema-toolfor an entity before filtering on custom fields, which differ by workspace - Use
POST /v1/people/upsertor/v1/companies/upsertwith a unique field to avoid duplicates on retry - Keep MCP calls under 120 a minute per user and REST writes under 60 a minute per token on Cloud Pro
Questions
Which is better for AI agents, Attio API + MCP or Relaticle?
Attio API + MCP scores 60.9 (C) on agent readiness against Relaticle's 59.6 (C), and leads in 2 of 7 scored categories. Relaticle leads on maintenance & community.
Do Attio API + MCP and Relaticle need an API key?
Both take an API key or an OAuth sign-in.
Can an agent call Attio API + MCP and Relaticle without installing anything?
Yes. Attio API + MCP has a hosted endpoint at https://api.attio.com/v2 and Relaticle at https://mcp.relaticle.com.
Are Attio API + MCP and Relaticle open source?
No open-source release is listed for Attio API + MCP. Relaticle is open source (AGPL-3.0).
Other comparisons with Attio API + MCP or Relaticle
- Affinity vs Attio API + MCP
- Affinity vs Relaticle
- Attio API + MCP vs Breakcold
- Attio API + MCP vs Capsule CRM
- Attio API + MCP vs Close API + MCP
- Attio API + MCP vs Copper API
- Attio API + MCP vs Microsoft Dynamics 365 Sales
- Attio API + MCP vs folk API + MCP
- Attio API + MCP vs Freshsales API
- Attio API + MCP vs HubSpot API + MCP
- Attio API + MCP vs Nutshell
- Attio API + MCP vs Payani AI
- Attio API + MCP vs Pipedrive API + MCP
- Attio API + MCP vs Salesflare
- Attio API + MCP vs Salesforce API + MCP
- Attio API + MCP vs Streak API + MCP
- Attio API + MCP vs SugarAI (SugarCRM)
- Attio API + MCP vs Twenty API + MCP
- Attio API + MCP vs Zoho CRM
- Breakcold vs Relaticle
- Capsule CRM vs Relaticle
- Close API + MCP vs Relaticle
- Copper API vs Relaticle
- Microsoft Dynamics 365 Sales vs Relaticle
- folk API + MCP vs Relaticle
- Freshsales API vs Relaticle
- HubSpot API + MCP vs Relaticle
- Nutshell vs Relaticle
- Payani AI vs Relaticle
- Pipedrive API + MCP vs Relaticle
- Relaticle vs Salesflare
- Relaticle vs Salesforce API + MCP
- Relaticle vs Streak API + MCP
- Relaticle vs SugarAI (SugarCRM)
- Relaticle vs Twenty API + MCP
- Relaticle vs Zoho CRM
Machine-readable
- This page as Markdown
/compare/attio-vs-relaticle.md· slim.min.md· JSON.json(or sendAccept: text/markdown) - Each listing in full
/api/v1/tools/attio.json·/api/v1/tools/relaticle.json - From a terminal
anchor compare attio relaticle(the CLI) - Over MCP
compare_tools {"a": "attio", "b": "relaticle"}at/mcp, no key