Head to head · FHIR servers · October 2026 research run
Aidbox vs Particle Health
Aidbox scores 64.2 (B) on agent readiness against Particle Health's 48.6 (D), and leads in 6 of 7 scored categories. Both do fhir servers.
Best health record and wellness data APIs for AI agents · All 63 health comparisons
Which one, for what
Aidbox B
Best for An organisation building its own clinical data repository, EHR or payer platform on FHIR, where an agent works against that store.
Ahead on
- Schema & documentation, 77 against 69
- Agent ergonomics, 79 against 53
- Security & auth, 74 against 57
- Payments & pricing, 25 against 5
- Maintenance & community, 80 against 27
Watch for
No built-in rate limiting or brute-force protection, by the vendor's hardening page
Best for US providers, payers and digital health companies that need a patient's network records as FHIR or flat data, and care-event alerts.
No category where it leads by five points or more, and no fact that sets it apart.
Watch for
Credentials come from a Particle representative, and the 'play for free' sign-up domain did not resolve
Score by category
| Category | Weight this run | Aidbox | Particle Health | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Reliability | 16%20 | 59 | 58 | Aidbox +1 |
| Performance | 10%pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |
| Schema & documentation | 13%16.2 | 77 | 69 | Aidbox +8 |
| Agent ergonomics | 13%16.2 | 79 | 53 | Aidbox +26 |
| Security & auth | 14%17.5 | 74 | 57 | Aidbox +17 |
| Payments & pricing | 10%12.5 | 25 | 5 | Aidbox +20 |
| Task success | 10%pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |
| Maintenance & community | 7%8.8 | 80 | 27 | Aidbox +53 |
| Transparency & trust | 7%8.8 | 45 | 48 | Particle Health +3 |
| Negative events | ≤15 | 0 | 0 | |
| Total | B 64.2/100 | D 48.6/100 |
Facts side by side
| Fact | Aidbox | Particle Health |
|---|---|---|
| Kind | HTTP API | HTTP API |
| Vendor | Health Samurai, Inc. | Particle Health, Inc. |
| Hosted endpoint | no (local only) | no (local only) |
| Transports | HTTP, Streamable HTTP, SSE (legacy) | HTTP |
| Auth | OAuth | OAuth |
| Pricing | Freemium | Paid |
| x402 | no | no |
| Licence | Proprietary. Aidbox runs from Health Samurai's Docker images under a free development licence (no PHI) or a paid production licence. Examples and the Python SDK on GitHub are MIT | Proprietary service under customer agreements. The public terms of use (effective 15 October 2020) cover the website only |
| Tools exposed | 9 | none |
| Read-only variant documented | no | no |
| llms.txt | yes | yes |
| Last release | 2026-10-08 | none |
| Terms last updated | no document linked | 2020-10-15 |
| Privacy policy last updated | 2021-06-10 | 2026-07-29 |
| Customer content may train models | not found in the text | |
| Terms restrict automated access | yes | |
| Terms restrict benchmarking | not found in the text | |
| Terms or service can change without notice | yes | |
| Arbitration or class-action waiver | yes |
Verdicts
Aidbox
Graded on the FHIR REST API of an Aidbox instance the owner runs. Monthly releases, two-year LTS lines, SMART on FHIR, AccessPolicy rules and AuditEvent logging are documented, and a free development licence needs no sales call. Aidbox has no rate limiting of its own, its MCP module is alpha, and no terms of service were found on the website.
Particle Health
Particle queries Carequality, CommonWell, eHealth Exchange and state HIEs for a patient and returns FHIR R4B, flat data or C-CDA, with project-scoped 60-minute tokens and OpenAPI fragments per endpoint. Credentials come through a representative, the free sign-up link was dead on 14 October 2026, and rate limits, SLA and changelog are unpublished.
Before you call either
Aidbox
- Ask the operator for a Client with an AccessPolicy limited to the task. Don't rely on the public MCP policy, which the docs mark unsafe
- Use
If-None-Existon creates and conditional update on identifiers so retries don't duplicate records - Use
_elementsand_countto keep responses small, and follow the Bundle's paging links - Throttle yourself. Aidbox applies no rate limit, so a burst lands on the customer's database
- Don't load real patient data into an instance on a development licence
Particle Health
- Pass
projects/<project_id>as the scope when requesting a token, and request a new one every 60 minutes - Poll Get Query Status, or wait for the query-complete webhook, before reading FHIR or flat data
- Back off on 429, since limits change with system load
- Pass continuation tokens back verbatim when paging
- Use the published synthetic patients in sandbox, and stay under 500 queries a day
Questions
Which is better for AI agents, Aidbox or Particle Health?
Aidbox scores 64.2 (B) on agent readiness against Particle Health's 48.6 (D), and leads in 6 of 7 scored categories.
Do Aidbox and Particle Health need an API key?
Both use an OAuth sign-in.
Can an agent call Aidbox and Particle Health without installing anything?
No hosted endpoint is listed for Aidbox. No hosted endpoint is listed for Particle Health.
Other comparisons with Aidbox or Particle Health
- Aidbox vs Health Gorilla
- Aidbox vs Medblocks
- Aidbox vs Medplum
- Aidbox vs Metriport Medical API
- Aidbox vs Redox
- Aidbox vs ROOK
- Aidbox vs Terra API
- Aidbox vs Zus Health
- Medplum vs Particle Health
- Particle Health vs ROOK
- Particle Health vs Terra API
- 1upHealth vs Aidbox
- 1upHealth vs Particle Health
- Health Gorilla vs Particle Health
- Medblocks vs Particle Health
- Metriport Medical API vs Particle Health
- Particle Health vs Redox
- Particle Health vs Zus Health
- Aidbox vs Validic Inform
Machine-readable
- This page as Markdown
/compare/aidbox-vs-particle-health.md· slim.min.md· JSON.json(or sendAccept: text/markdown) - Each listing in full
/api/v1/tools/aidbox.json·/api/v1/tools/particle-health.json - From a terminal
anchor compare aidbox particle-health(the CLI) - Over MCP
compare_tools {"a": "aidbox", "b": "particle-health"}at/mcp, no key