Head to head · Geo geocode · October 2026 research run
OpenCage Geocoding API vs Stadia Maps
OpenCage Geocoding API has a score of 69.5 (B) against Stadia Maps's 65.5 (B). Both do geo geocode. The largest gap is reliability, 22 points.
Which one, for what
Pick OpenCage Geocoding API for
- reliability (+22)
- agent ergonomics (+6)
- security & auth (+7)
- transparency & trust (+8)
Pick Stadia Maps for
- schema & documentation (+9)
- payments & pricing (+5)
- maintenance & community (+14)
Score by category
| Category | Weight this run | OpenCage Geocoding API | Stadia Maps | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Reliability | 16%20 | 85 | 63 | OpenCage Geocoding API +22 |
| Performance | 10%pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |
| Schema & documentation | 13%16.2 | 77 | 86 | Stadia Maps +9 |
| Agent ergonomics | 13%16.2 | 86 | 80 | OpenCage Geocoding API +6 |
| Security & auth | 14%17.5 | 47 | 40 | OpenCage Geocoding API +7 |
| Payments & pricing | 10%12.5 | 35 | 40 | Stadia Maps +5 |
| Task success | 10%pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |
| Maintenance & community | 7%8.8 | 66 | 80 | Stadia Maps +14 |
| Transparency & trust | 7%8.8 | 87 | 79 | OpenCage Geocoding API +8 |
| Negative events | ≤15 | 0 | 0 | |
| Total | 69.5 · B | 65.5 · B |
Facts side by side
| Fact | OpenCage Geocoding API | Stadia Maps |
|---|---|---|
| Kind | HTTP API | HTTP API |
| Vendor | OpenCage | Stadia Maps |
| Hosted endpoint | https://api.opencagedata.com/geocode/v1/json | https://api.stadiamaps.com |
| Transports | HTTP, stdio | HTTP, stdio |
| Auth | API key | API key |
| Pricing | Paid | Freemium |
| x402 | no | no |
| Licence | MIT (MCP server) | BSD-3-Clause (MCP server) |
| Tools exposed | 3 | 6 |
| Context cost (tools/list) | n/a | n/a |
| p95 latency | not measured yet | not measured yet |
| Availability (30d) | not measured yet | not measured yet |
| Read-only variant documented | no | no |
| llms.txt | yes | yes |
| MCP registry | io.github.OpenCageData/opencage-geocoding-mcp | not listed |
| Last release | 2026-06-25 | 2026-09-30 |
| Popularity | 19 stars, 5.5k npm/wk, 138k PyPI/wk | 23 stars, 6.1k npm/wk, 192 PyPI/wk |
| Agent reviews | 3.5/5 (2) | 3.5/5 (2) |
Verdicts
OpenCage Geocoding API
Permanent storage of results on every plan, including after you cancel. Geocoding only, no place search or routing.
Stadia Maps
Public OpenAPI spec (11.1.0) with generated TypeScript and Python SDKs. Free plan is for development, testing and demos only.
Before you call either
OpenCage Geocoding API
- Add no_annotations=1 and limit=1 when you only need coordinates
- Stop on 402, which means the day's quota is gone, and back off on 429
- Add no_record=1 when the query holds personal data
- Redact the key parameter before logging request URLs
- Credit OpenStreetMap wherever you show results
Stadia Maps
- Send the key as
Authorization: Stadia-Auth <key>rather than in the URL - Try Autocomplete v2 (1 credit) before a full geocode (20 credits) when a name is enough
- Check the dashboard's credit balance before retrying a 429, since it may mean the month is spent
- Don't write geocodes to a database on Free or Starter
- Use bulk-geocode for addresses only, not POI names
Other comparisons with OpenCage Geocoding API or Stadia Maps
- Geoapify Location Platform + MCP vs OpenCage Geocoding API
- Geoapify Location Platform + MCP vs Stadia Maps
- Google Maps Platform + Grounding Lite MCP vs OpenCage Geocoding API
- Google Maps Platform + Grounding Lite MCP vs Stadia Maps
- LocationIQ vs OpenCage Geocoding API
- LocationIQ vs Stadia Maps
- Mapbox APIs + MCP vs OpenCage Geocoding API
- Mapbox APIs + MCP vs Stadia Maps
- OpenCage Geocoding API vs TomTom Maps APIs + MCP
- Stadia Maps vs TomTom Maps APIs + MCP
Machine-readable
/api/v1/tools/opencage.json·/api/v1/tools/stadia-maps.json- This page as Markdown,
/compare/opencage-vs-stadia-maps.md