# OpenCage Geocoding API vs Stadia Maps (slim)

> OpenCage Geocoding API has a score of 69.5 (B) against Stadia Maps's 65.5 (B). Both do geo geocode. The largest gap is reliability, 22 points. Category scores, facts, verdicts and agent notes side by side.

- Full: https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/opencage-vs-stadia-maps.md (~1,400 tokens) · this version ~380 tokens · JSON https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/opencage-vs-stadia-maps.json · canonical https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/opencage-vs-stadia-maps
- Index: https://www.anchorterminal.com/llms.txt · API: https://www.anchorterminal.com/api/v1/index.json · Updated: 2026-10-05

OpenCage Geocoding API has a score of 69.5 (B) against Stadia Maps's 65.5 (B). Both do geo geocode. The largest gap is reliability, 22 points.

- OpenCage Geocoding API: B 69.5, rank #113 of 452 · https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/opencage.min.md
- Stadia Maps: B 65.5, rank #171 of 452 · https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/stadia-maps.min.md
- Pick OpenCage Geocoding API for reliability (+22), agent ergonomics (+6), security & auth (+7), transparency & trust (+8). Pick Stadia Maps for schema & documentation (+9), payments & pricing (+5), maintenance & community (+14).

| Category | OpenCage Geocoding API | Stadia Maps |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Reliability (16%) | 85 | 63 |
| Performance (10%) | pending | pending |
| Schema & documentation (13%) | 77 | 86 |
| Agent ergonomics (13%) | 86 | 80 |
| Security & auth (14%) | 47 | 40 |
| Payments & pricing (10%) | 35 | 40 |
| Task success (10%) | pending | pending |
| Maintenance & community (7%) | 66 | 80 |
| Transparency & trust (7%) | 87 | 79 |