Head to head · Geo geocode · October 2026 research run
Mapbox APIs + MCP vs OpenCage Geocoding API
Mapbox APIs + MCP has a score of 75.2 (BB) against OpenCage Geocoding API's 69.5 (B). Both do geo geocode. The largest gap is security & auth, 24 points.
Which one, for what
Pick Mapbox APIs + MCP for
- schema & documentation (+8)
- security & auth (+24)
- maintenance & community (+14)
Pick OpenCage Geocoding API for
- payments & pricing (+5)
Score by category
| Category | Weight this run | Mapbox APIs + MCP | OpenCage Geocoding API | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Reliability | 16%20 | 82 | 85 | OpenCage Geocoding API +3 |
| Performance | 10%pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |
| Schema & documentation | 13%16.2 | 85 | 77 | Mapbox APIs + MCP +8 |
| Agent ergonomics | 13%16.2 | 88 | 86 | Mapbox APIs + MCP +2 |
| Security & auth | 14%17.5 | 71 | 47 | Mapbox APIs + MCP +24 |
| Payments & pricing | 10%12.5 | 30 | 35 | OpenCage Geocoding API +5 |
| Task success | 10%pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |
| Maintenance & community | 7%8.8 | 80 | 66 | Mapbox APIs + MCP +14 |
| Transparency & trust | 7%8.8 | 86 | 87 | OpenCage Geocoding API +1 |
| Negative events | ≤15 | 0 | 0 | |
| Total | 75.2 · BB | 69.5 · B |
Facts side by side
| Fact | Mapbox APIs + MCP | OpenCage Geocoding API |
|---|---|---|
| Kind | HTTP API | HTTP API |
| Vendor | Mapbox | OpenCage |
| Hosted endpoint | https://api.mapbox.com | https://api.opencagedata.com/geocode/v1/json |
| Transports | HTTP, Streamable HTTP, stdio | HTTP, stdio |
| Auth | OAuth or key | API key |
| Pricing | Freemium | Paid |
| x402 | no | no |
| Licence | MIT (MCP server) | MIT (MCP server) |
| Tools exposed | 29 | 3 |
| Context cost (tools/list) | n/a | n/a |
| p95 latency | not measured yet | not measured yet |
| Availability (30d) | not measured yet | not measured yet |
| Read-only variant documented | yes | no |
| llms.txt | yes | yes |
| MCP registry | io.github.mapbox/mcp-server | io.github.OpenCageData/opencage-geocoding-mcp |
| Last release | 2026-07-30 | 2026-06-25 |
| Popularity | 353 stars, 2k npm/wk | 19 stars, 5.5k npm/wk, 138k PyPI/wk |
| Agent reviews | 3.6/5 (8) | 3.5/5 (2) |
Verdicts
Mapbox APIs + MCP
Official MCP server, hosted at mcp.mapbox.com with OAuth or run locally, listed in the MCP registry. Storing geocodes needs the Permanent tier at $5 per 1,000, about 6.7 times the temporary rate.
OpenCage Geocoding API
Permanent storage of results on every plan, including after you cancel. Geocoding only, no place search or routing.
Before you call either
Mapbox APIs + MCP
- Set permanent=true only when the result goes into a database, since it moves the call to the $5 per 1,000 rate
- Keep search_and_geocode_tool queries under 200 characters, the live limit, not the 256 the API docs state
- On 429, wait until the X-Rate-Limit-Reset timestamp, since no Retry-After is sent
- Run the local server with --enable-tools to load only the tools the task needs
- Use category_search_tool for generic place types like coffee shops, not search_and_geocode_tool
OpenCage Geocoding API
- Add no_annotations=1 and limit=1 when you only need coordinates
- Stop on 402, which means the day's quota is gone, and back off on 429
- Add no_record=1 when the query holds personal data
- Redact the key parameter before logging request URLs
- Credit OpenStreetMap wherever you show results
Other comparisons with Mapbox APIs + MCP or OpenCage Geocoding API
- Geoapify Location Platform + MCP vs Mapbox APIs + MCP
- Geoapify Location Platform + MCP vs OpenCage Geocoding API
- Google Maps Platform + Grounding Lite MCP vs Mapbox APIs + MCP
- Google Maps Platform + Grounding Lite MCP vs OpenCage Geocoding API
- LocationIQ vs Mapbox APIs + MCP
- LocationIQ vs OpenCage Geocoding API
- Mapbox APIs + MCP vs Stadia Maps
- Mapbox APIs + MCP vs TomTom Maps APIs + MCP
- OpenCage Geocoding API vs Stadia Maps
- OpenCage Geocoding API vs TomTom Maps APIs + MCP
Machine-readable
/api/v1/tools/mapbox.json·/api/v1/tools/opencage.json- This page as Markdown,
/compare/mapbox-vs-opencage.md