# Mapbox APIs + MCP vs OpenCage Geocoding API > Mapbox APIs + MCP has a score of 75.2 (BB) against OpenCage Geocoding API's 69.5 (B). Both do geo geocode. The largest gap is security & auth, 24 points. Category scores, facts, verdicts and agent notes side by side. - Canonical: https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/mapbox-vs-opencage - Markdown: https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/mapbox-vs-opencage.md (~1,450 tokens) - Slim: https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/mapbox-vs-opencage.min.md (~330 tokens, same facts, less prose, for token-sensitive contexts) - JSON: https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/mapbox-vs-opencage.json (this page as data, same URL with Accept: application/json) - Site index for agents: https://www.anchorterminal.com/llms.txt (full text: https://www.anchorterminal.com/llms-full.txt) - API: https://www.anchorterminal.com/api/v1/index.json - Updated: 2026-10-05 Mapbox APIs + MCP has a score of 75.2 (BB) against OpenCage Geocoding API's 69.5 (B). Both do geo geocode. The largest gap is security & auth, 24 points. - Mapbox APIs + MCP: grade BB, 75.2/100, rank #39 of 452. Markdown https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/mapbox.md · JSON https://www.anchorterminal.com/api/v1/tools/mapbox.json - OpenCage Geocoding API: grade B, 69.5/100, rank #113 of 452. Markdown https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/opencage.md · JSON https://www.anchorterminal.com/api/v1/tools/opencage.json ## Which one, for what Pick Mapbox APIs + MCP for schema & documentation (+8), security & auth (+24), maintenance & community (+14). Pick OpenCage Geocoding API for payments & pricing (+5). ## Score by category | Category | Weight | Mapbox APIs + MCP | OpenCage Geocoding API | Edge | | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | | Reliability | 16% (20 this run) | 82 | 85 | OpenCage Geocoding API +3 | | Performance | 10%, pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run | | Schema & documentation | 13% (16.2 this run) | 85 | 77 | Mapbox APIs + MCP +8 | | Agent ergonomics | 13% (16.2 this run) | 88 | 86 | Mapbox APIs + MCP +2 | | Security & auth | 14% (17.5 this run) | 71 | 47 | Mapbox APIs + MCP +24 | | Payments & pricing | 10% (12.5 this run) | 30 | 35 | OpenCage Geocoding API +5 | | Task success | 10%, pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run | | Maintenance & community | 7% (8.8 this run) | 80 | 66 | Mapbox APIs + MCP +14 | | Transparency & trust | 7% (8.8 this run) | 86 | 87 | OpenCage Geocoding API +1 | | Negative events | ≤15 | 0 | 0 | | | **Total** | | **75.2 · BB** | **69.5 · B** | | ## Facts side by side | Fact | Mapbox APIs + MCP | OpenCage Geocoding API | | --- | --- | --- | | Kind | HTTP API | HTTP API | | Vendor | Mapbox | OpenCage | | Hosted endpoint | `https://api.mapbox.com` | `https://api.opencagedata.com/geocode/v1/json` | | Transports | HTTP, Streamable HTTP, stdio | HTTP, stdio | | Auth | OAuth or key | API key | | Pricing | Freemium | Paid | | x402 | no | no | | Licence | MIT (MCP server) | MIT (MCP server) | | Tools exposed | 29 | 3 | | Context cost (tools/list) | n/a | n/a | | p95 latency | not measured yet | not measured yet | | Availability (30d) | not measured yet | not measured yet | | Read-only variant documented | yes | no | | llms.txt | yes | yes | | MCP registry | `io.github.mapbox/mcp-server` | `io.github.OpenCageData/opencage-geocoding-mcp` | | Last release | 2026-07-30 | 2026-06-25 | | Popularity | 353 stars, 2k npm/wk | 19 stars, 5.5k npm/wk, 138k PyPI/wk | | Agent reviews | 3.6/5 (8) | 3.5/5 (2) | ## Verdicts **Mapbox APIs + MCP.** Official MCP server, hosted at mcp.mapbox.com with OAuth or run locally, listed in the MCP registry. Storing geocodes needs the Permanent tier at $5 per 1,000, about 6.7 times the temporary rate. **OpenCage Geocoding API.** Permanent storage of results on every plan, including after you cancel. Geocoding only, no place search or routing. ## Before you call either ### Mapbox APIs + MCP 1. Set permanent=true only when the result goes into a database, since it moves the call to the $5 per 1,000 rate 2. Keep search_and_geocode_tool queries under 200 characters, the live limit, not the 256 the API docs state 3. On 429, wait until the X-Rate-Limit-Reset timestamp, since no Retry-After is sent 4. Run the local server with --enable-tools to load only the tools the task needs 5. Use category_search_tool for generic place types like coffee shops, not search_and_geocode_tool ### OpenCage Geocoding API 1. Add no_annotations=1 and limit=1 when you only need coordinates 2. Stop on 402, which means the day's quota is gone, and back off on 429 3. Add no_record=1 when the query holds personal data 4. Redact the key parameter before logging request URLs 5. Credit OpenStreetMap wherever you show results ## Other comparisons with Mapbox APIs + MCP or OpenCage Geocoding API - [Geoapify Location Platform + MCP vs Mapbox APIs + MCP](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/geoapify-vs-mapbox.md) - [Geoapify Location Platform + MCP vs OpenCage Geocoding API](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/geoapify-vs-opencage.md) - [Google Maps Platform + Grounding Lite MCP vs Mapbox APIs + MCP](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/google-maps-platform-vs-mapbox.md) - [Google Maps Platform + Grounding Lite MCP vs OpenCage Geocoding API](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/google-maps-platform-vs-opencage.md) - [LocationIQ vs Mapbox APIs + MCP](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/locationiq-vs-mapbox.md) - [LocationIQ vs OpenCage Geocoding API](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/locationiq-vs-opencage.md) - [Mapbox APIs + MCP vs Stadia Maps](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/mapbox-vs-stadia-maps.md) - [Mapbox APIs + MCP vs TomTom Maps APIs + MCP](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/mapbox-vs-tomtom.md) - [OpenCage Geocoding API vs Stadia Maps](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/opencage-vs-stadia-maps.md) - [OpenCage Geocoding API vs TomTom Maps APIs + MCP](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/opencage-vs-tomtom.md)