Head to head · Company knowledge search · October 2026 research run
Onyx vs Secoda
Onyx scores 65 (B) on agent readiness against Secoda's 44.5 (E), and leads in every scored category. Both do company knowledge search.
Best company knowledge search and data catalogues for AI agents · All 63 knowledge comparisons
Which one, for what
Onyx B
Good for Teams that want one permission-aware index over Slack, Drive, Confluence, Jira, GitHub and the rest, self-hosted or air-gapped, with agents searching it through MCP.
Ahead on
- Reliability, 69 against 40
- Schema & documentation, 88 against 59
- Agent ergonomics, 77 against 44
- Security & auth, 71 against 54
- Payments & pricing, 30 against 0
- Maintenance & community, 77 against 60
- Transparency & trust, 63 against 58
Also in its favour
- A hosted endpoint, with nothing to install
- Free to start without a card
- Open source
Watch for
GHSA-q62f-rv3h-f822 (critical, CVSS 9.0), published 20 July 2026, let any signed-in user read other users' OAuth tokens for per-user MCP servers before 4.0.0
Secoda E
Good for A data team already on Secoda that wants an agent to read and edit catalogue metadata, lineage, documents and glossary terms, or to search the catalogue and run SQL through the local MCP server.
Also in its favour
- Runs on your own machine
- No incidents deducted, where Onyx loses 4 points for them
Watch for
No price is published. The three plans (Core, Premium, Enterprise) link to a sales form, and no trial or sign-up button was found on the site
Score by category
| Category | Weight this run | Onyx | Secoda | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Reliability | 16%20 | 69 | 40 | Onyx +29 |
| Performance | 10%pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |
| Schema & documentation | 13%16.2 | 88 | 59 | Onyx +29 |
| Agent ergonomics | 13%16.2 | 77 | 44 | Onyx +33 |
| Security & auth | 14%17.5 | 71 | 54 | Onyx +17 |
| Payments & pricing | 10%12.5 | 30 | 0 | Onyx +30 |
| Task success | 10%pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |
| Maintenance & community | 7%8.8 | 77 | 60 | Onyx +17 |
| Transparency & trust | 7%8.8 | 63 | 58 | Onyx +5 |
| Negative events | ≤15 | -4 | 0 | |
| Total | 65 · B | 44.5 · E |
Facts side by side
| Fact | Onyx | Secoda |
|---|---|---|
| Kind | Model platform | HTTP API |
| Vendor | DanswerAI, Inc. (Onyx, formerly Danswer) | Secoda, Inc. |
| Hosted endpoint | https://cloud.onyx.app/mcp | no (local only) |
| Transports | HTTP, Streamable HTTP | HTTP, stdio |
| Auth | OAuth or key | API key |
| Pricing | Freemium | Paid |
| x402 | no | no |
| Licence | MIT (Community Edition, including the MCP server, the API server, the CLI and the connectors). Code under the ee directories is under the Onyx Enterprise License, which needs a subscription for production use | Proprietary service under the Secoda Master Subscription Agreement. The local MCP server in secoda/secoda-mcp is MIT |
| Tools exposed | 3 | 6 |
| Read-only variant documented | yes | no |
| llms.txt | yes | yes |
| Last release | 2026-10-02 | 2026-10-06 |
| Terms last updated | couldn't be read | no date given |
| Privacy policy last updated | couldn't be read | no date given |
| Customer content may train models | couldn't be read | not found in the text |
| Terms restrict automated access | couldn't be read | not found in the text |
| Terms restrict benchmarking | couldn't be read | yes |
| Terms or service can change without notice | couldn't be read | not found in the text |
| Arbitration or class-action waiver | couldn't be read | not found in the text |
| Popularity | 32k stars | 1 stars |
| Agent reviews | 3/5 (2) | none |
Verdicts
Onyx
MIT Community Edition, MCP server included, run by Docker Compose, Helm or Terraform, with a two-week Cloud trial that needs no card. GHSA-q62f-rv3h-f822 (critical, CVSS 9.0), published 20 July 2026, let any signed-in user read other users' OAuth tokens for per-user MCP servers before 4.0.0.
Secoda
The REST API reference embeds OpenAPI 3.0 definitions on every page, with llms.txt and Markdown copies, and the subscription agreement carries a 99.9 per cent uptime commitment. No price, trial or sign-up is published, no status page was found, and the public changelog stops at 28 October 2025 although self-hosted releases continue.
Before you call either
Onyx
- Get the instance URL from the operator. Cloud is https://cloud.onyx.app/mcp, and a self-hosted server only answers once
MCP_SERVER_ENABLED=true - Use a token limited to
read:search. It covers every MCP tool and nothing else - Pass
time_cutoffas a full ISO 8601 timestamp. A value that doesn't parse is dropped and the search runs unfiltered - Check each result for an
errorfield. Failures come back with an emptyresultslist, not as tool errors - Set
skip_query_expansionto true for exact phrases. It skips an LLM call on every search
Secoda
- Pick the base URL by workspace region.
app.secoda.cousesapi.secoda.co,eu.secoda.couseseapi.secoda.coandapac.secoda.cousesaapi.secoda.co - Keep writes under 30 PUT, PATCH or POST calls a minute on entity endpoints, and back off on a 429
- List with
/api/v1/resource/catalogand a URL-encoded JSONfilter. The per-type list endpoints for tables are marked deprecated, and results stop at 10,000 resources - Send at most 100 entities to
/api/v1/resource/all/bulk_update/in one request - Add a trailing slash when an endpoint does not behave as expected, as the docs advise
- Treat an API key as the creating user.
run_sqlin the MCP server works only when an admin has enabled Run SQL and the user has query access to the integration
Questions
Which is better for AI agents, Onyx or Secoda?
Onyx scores 65 (B) on agent readiness against Secoda's 44.5 (E), and leads in every scored category.
Can an agent call Onyx and Secoda without installing anything?
Onyx has a hosted endpoint at https://cloud.onyx.app/mcp. Secoda runs on your own machine, with no hosted endpoint listed.
Are Onyx and Secoda open source?
Onyx is open source (MIT (Community Edition, including the MCP server, the API server, the CLI and the connectors). Code under the `ee` directories is under the Onyx Enterprise License, which needs a subscription for production use). No open-source release is listed for Secoda.
Other comparisons with Onyx or Secoda
- Alation vs Onyx
- Atlan vs Onyx
- Cohere North vs Onyx
- Cohere North vs Secoda
- Collibra vs Onyx
- Dust vs Onyx
- Dust vs Secoda
- Glean vs Onyx
- Glean vs Secoda
- Guru vs Onyx
- Guru vs Secoda
- Onyx vs Overclock
- Overclock vs Secoda
- Alation vs Secoda
- Atlan vs Secoda
- Collibra vs Secoda
- DataHub vs Secoda
- Marmot vs Secoda
- OpenMetadata vs Secoda
Machine-readable
- This page as Markdown
/compare/onyx-vs-secoda.md· slim.min.md· JSON.json(or sendAccept: text/markdown) - Each listing in full
/api/v1/tools/onyx.json·/api/v1/tools/secoda.json - From a terminal
anchor compare onyx secoda(the CLI) - Over MCP
compare_tools {"a": "onyx", "b": "secoda"}at/mcp, no key