Head to head · Company knowledge search · October 2026 research run
Dust vs Secoda
Dust scores 62.8 (B) on agent readiness against Secoda's 44.5 (E), and leads in every scored category. Both do company knowledge search.
Best company knowledge search and data catalogues for AI agents · All 63 knowledge comparisons
Which one, for what
Dust B
Good for A team that already works in Dust and wants an outside agent to search its spaces, read documents and call its agents with a user's own access.
Ahead on
- Reliability, 53 against 40
- Schema & documentation, 75 against 59
- Agent ergonomics, 67 against 44
- Security & auth, 75 against 54
- Payments & pricing, 20 against 0
- Maintenance & community, 86 against 60
- Transparency & trust, 68 against 58
Also in its favour
- A hosted endpoint, with nothing to install
- Open source
Watch for
Programmatic usage has no free credits. It draws only on the workspace credit pool, which Free seats cannot use
Secoda E
Good for A data team already on Secoda that wants an agent to read and edit catalogue metadata, lineage, documents and glossary terms, or to search the catalogue and run SQL through the local MCP server.
Also in its favour
- Runs on your own machine
Watch for
No price is published. The three plans (Core, Premium, Enterprise) link to a sales form, and no trial or sign-up button was found on the site
Score by category
| Category | Weight this run | Dust | Secoda | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Reliability | 16%20 | 53 | 40 | Dust +13 |
| Performance | 10%pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |
| Schema & documentation | 13%16.2 | 75 | 59 | Dust +16 |
| Agent ergonomics | 13%16.2 | 67 | 44 | Dust +23 |
| Security & auth | 14%17.5 | 75 | 54 | Dust +21 |
| Payments & pricing | 10%12.5 | 20 | 0 | Dust +20 |
| Task success | 10%pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |
| Maintenance & community | 7%8.8 | 86 | 60 | Dust +26 |
| Transparency & trust | 7%8.8 | 68 | 58 | Dust +10 |
| Negative events | ≤15 | 0 | 0 | |
| Total | 62.8 · B | 44.5 · E |
Facts side by side
| Fact | Dust | Secoda |
|---|---|---|
| Kind | HTTP API | HTTP API |
| Vendor | Permutation Labs | Secoda, Inc. |
| Hosted endpoint | https://dust.tt/mcp | no (local only) |
| Transports | HTTP | HTTP, stdio |
| Auth | OAuth or key | API key |
| Pricing | Freemium | Paid |
| x402 | no | no |
| Licence | MIT for the platform's source at github.com/dust-tt/dust. The hosted service is sold under Dust's own terms. The npm page gives ISC for @dust-tt/client and MIT for @dust-tt/dust-cli | Proprietary service under the Secoda Master Subscription Agreement. The local MCP server in secoda/secoda-mcp is MIT |
| Tools exposed | none | 6 |
| Read-only variant documented | no | no |
| llms.txt | yes | yes |
| Last release | 2026-10-08 | 2026-10-06 |
| Terms last updated | no document linked | no date given |
| Privacy policy last updated | no date given | no date given |
| Customer content may train models | not found in the text | |
| Terms restrict automated access | not found in the text | |
| Terms restrict benchmarking | yes | |
| Terms or service can change without notice | not found in the text | |
| Arbitration or class-action waiver | not found in the text | |
| Popularity | 1.5k stars, 17k npm/wk | 1 stars |
Verdicts
Dust
The whole platform is MIT on GitHub, with a public OpenAPI document of 68 operations, llms.txt and a remote MCP server that acts with the signed-in user's access. API calls that run agents draw only on a paid workspace credit pool, and the terms of service could not be read.
Secoda
The REST API reference embeds OpenAPI 3.0 definitions on every page, with llms.txt and Markdown copies, and the subscription agreement carries a 99.9 per cent uptime commitment. No price, trial or sign-up is published, no status page was found, and the public changelog stops at 28 October 2025 although self-hosted releases continue.
Before you call either
Dust
- Use
https://eu.dust.ttfor a workspace in the EU region andhttps://dust.ttotherwise, for both the API and the MCP server - Connect an MCP client by OAuth and send the
resourceparameter in authorisation and token requests. API keys do not work on the MCP server - Expect HTTP 429 with type
rate_limit_errorwhen the credit pool, the programmatic monthly cap or the key's spend cap is exhausted. Retrying will not help - Call
GET /api/v1/w/{wId}/searchwithlimit(1 to 100, default 25) andcursor, or a data source view's search withtop_k - Keep document upserts under 120 a minute per workspace
Secoda
- Pick the base URL by workspace region.
app.secoda.cousesapi.secoda.co,eu.secoda.couseseapi.secoda.coandapac.secoda.cousesaapi.secoda.co - Keep writes under 30 PUT, PATCH or POST calls a minute on entity endpoints, and back off on a 429
- List with
/api/v1/resource/catalogand a URL-encoded JSONfilter. The per-type list endpoints for tables are marked deprecated, and results stop at 10,000 resources - Send at most 100 entities to
/api/v1/resource/all/bulk_update/in one request - Add a trailing slash when an endpoint does not behave as expected, as the docs advise
- Treat an API key as the creating user.
run_sqlin the MCP server works only when an admin has enabled Run SQL and the user has query access to the integration
Questions
Which is better for AI agents, Dust or Secoda?
Dust scores 62.8 (B) on agent readiness against Secoda's 44.5 (E), and leads in every scored category.
Do Dust and Secoda need an API key?
Dust takes an API key or an OAuth sign-in. Secoda needs an API key.
Can an agent call Dust and Secoda without installing anything?
Dust has a hosted endpoint at https://dust.tt/mcp. Secoda runs on your own machine, with no hosted endpoint listed.
Are Dust and Secoda open source?
Dust is open source (MIT for the platform's source at github.com/dust-tt/dust. The hosted service is sold under Dust's own terms. The npm page gives ISC for `@dust-tt/client` and MIT for `@dust-tt/dust-cli`). No open-source release is listed for Secoda.
Other comparisons with Dust or Secoda
- Alation vs Dust
- Atlan vs Dust
- Cohere North vs Dust
- Cohere North vs Secoda
- Collibra vs Dust
- Dust vs Glean
- Dust vs Guru
- Dust vs Onyx
- Dust vs Overclock
- Glean vs Secoda
- Guru vs Secoda
- Onyx vs Secoda
- Overclock vs Secoda
- Alation vs Secoda
- Atlan vs Secoda
- Collibra vs Secoda
- DataHub vs Secoda
- Marmot vs Secoda
- OpenMetadata vs Secoda
Machine-readable
- This page as Markdown
/compare/dust-vs-secoda.md· slim.min.md· JSON.json(or sendAccept: text/markdown) - Each listing in full
/api/v1/tools/dust.json·/api/v1/tools/secoda.json - From a terminal
anchor compare dust secoda(the CLI) - Over MCP
compare_tools {"a": "dust", "b": "secoda"}at/mcp, no key