Get an audit

Head to head · Data catalogues · October 2026 research run

Collibra vs Secoda

Collibra scores 64.6 (B) on agent readiness against Secoda's 44.5 (E), and leads in 6 of 7 scored categories. Both do data catalogues.

Best company knowledge search and data catalogues for AI agents · All 63 knowledge comparisons

CollibraCollibra · HTTP API B64.6/100#346 of 950 SecodaSecoda, Inc. · HTTP API E44.5/100#875 of 950

Which one, for what

Collibra B

Good for An organisation that already runs Collibra and wants an agent to look up assets, glossary terms, lineage and data quality, or to write assets and classifications under a governed role.

Ahead on

  • Reliability, 66 against 40
  • Schema & documentation, 83 against 59
  • Agent ergonomics, 75 against 44
  • Security & auth, 68 against 54
  • Maintenance & community, 76 against 60
  • Transparency & trust, 82 against 58

Watch for

No published price, trial or self-serve sign-up. The pricing address returns 404 and the site links a demo request and a product tour

Secoda E

Good for A data team already on Secoda that wants an agent to read and edit catalogue metadata, lineage, documents and glossary terms, or to search the catalogue and run SQL through the local MCP server.

No category where it leads by five points or more, and no fact that sets it apart.

Watch for

No price is published. The three plans (Core, Premium, Enterprise) link to a sales form, and no trial or sign-up button was found on the site

Score by category

CategoryWeight this runCollibraSecodaEdge
Reliability16%206640Collibra +26
Performance10%pendingpendingpendingnot scored in this run
Schema & documentation13%16.28359Collibra +24
Agent ergonomics13%16.27544Collibra +31
Security & auth14%17.56854Collibra +14
Payments & pricing10%12.500even
Task success10%pendingpendingpendingnot scored in this run
Maintenance & community7%8.87660Collibra +16
Transparency & trust7%8.88258Collibra +24
Negative events≤1500
Total64.6 · B44.5 · E

Facts side by side

FactCollibraSecoda
KindHTTP APIHTTP API
VendorCollibraSecoda, Inc.
Hosted endpointno (local only)no (local only)
TransportsHTTP, Streamable HTTP, stdioHTTP, stdio
AuthOAuth or keyAPI key
PricingPaidPaid
x402nono
LicenceProprietary service under the Master Collibra Agreement, with the Developer Terms for the REST APIs and CLI. The local MCP server (chip) is Apache-2.0, and the CLI binary ships under a Binary Code Licence AgreementProprietary service under the Secoda Master Subscription Agreement. The local MCP server in secoda/secoda-mcp is MIT
Tools exposed306
Read-only variant documentednono
llms.txtyesyes
Last release2026-10-042026-10-06
Terms last updatedcouldn't be readno date given
Privacy policy last updatedcouldn't be readno date given
Customer content may train modelscouldn't be readnot found in the text
Terms restrict automated accesscouldn't be readnot found in the text
Terms restrict benchmarkingcouldn't be readyes
Terms or service can change without noticecouldn't be readnot found in the text
Arbitration or class-action waivercouldn't be readnot found in the text
Popularity37 stars1 stars

Verdicts

Collibra

Each REST API has an OpenAPI 3.0 definition, the developer portal publishes llms.txt and Markdown pages, and every MCP tool carries read-only and destructive annotations. Access needs a sales contract, since no price, trial or self-serve sign-up is published, and no general API rate limit was found in the reviewed documentation.

Secoda

The REST API reference embeds OpenAPI 3.0 definitions on every page, with llms.txt and Markdown copies, and the subscription agreement carries a 99.9 per cent uptime commitment. No price, trial or sign-up is published, no status page was found, and the public changelog stops at 28 October 2025 although self-hosted releases continue.

Before you call either

Collibra

  1. Ask a Collibra administrator to register an OAuth application. Integration applications use client credentials, and MCP clients need a user application with a redirect URI
  2. Reuse each access token for its 5 minutes. The token endpoint answers 429 once a client drains its pool of 100 tokens, refilled at 30 a minute
  3. Page large reads with cursor= and sortField=ID. Cursor and offset parameters cannot be combined, and Search API limit plus offset cannot exceed 10,000
  4. Keep Import API files to 10,000 assets or fewer and run at most 8 imports at once. Retry a job that fails on a concurrency error
  5. Expect discover_data_assets and discover_business_glossary to consume Collibra Units and to need the dgc.ai-copilot permission. Use search_asset_keyword for free keyword search

Secoda

  1. Pick the base URL by workspace region. app.secoda.co uses api.secoda.co, eu.secoda.co uses eapi.secoda.co and apac.secoda.co uses aapi.secoda.co
  2. Keep writes under 30 PUT, PATCH or POST calls a minute on entity endpoints, and back off on a 429
  3. List with /api/v1/resource/catalog and a URL-encoded JSON filter. The per-type list endpoints for tables are marked deprecated, and results stop at 10,000 resources
  4. Send at most 100 entities to /api/v1/resource/all/bulk_update/ in one request
  5. Add a trailing slash when an endpoint does not behave as expected, as the docs advise
  6. Treat an API key as the creating user. run_sql in the MCP server works only when an admin has enabled Run SQL and the user has query access to the integration

Questions

Which is better for AI agents, Collibra or Secoda?

Collibra scores 64.6 (B) on agent readiness against Secoda's 44.5 (E), and leads in 6 of 7 scored categories.

Do Collibra and Secoda need an API key?

Collibra takes an API key or an OAuth sign-in. Secoda needs an API key.

Can an agent call Collibra and Secoda without installing anything?

Collibra runs on your own machine, with no hosted endpoint listed. Secoda runs on your own machine, with no hosted endpoint listed.

Other comparisons with Collibra or Secoda

Machine-readable

For companies

Do agents find, use and choose your tools?

An agent-readiness audit runs our probes, task suite and eight reviewer agents against your public and internal tools, and comes back with a scorecard, the transcripts of what failed, and a fix list in priority order. From $2,500, re-run included. We never take payment to move a rank. We do help companies earn one.

Get an auditSee a sample report