Head to head · Databases · October 2026 research run
ObsessionDB vs Redis MCP
Redis MCP scores 55.7 (C) on agent readiness against ObsessionDB's 41.1 (E), and leads in 6 of 7 scored categories. ObsessionDB leads on agent ergonomics. Both do databases.
Best database, file and memory tools for AI agents · All 54 databases comparisons
Which one, for what
Best for An agent that needs SQL over large ClickHouse tables, and the database's own monitoring and alerts, through one hosted MCP connection.
Ahead on
- Agent ergonomics, 53 against 39
Also in its favour
- A hosted endpoint, with nothing to install
Watch for
No public status page or incident history was found, and the terms give no uptime SLA on self-service plans
Best for Teams with a Redis database that want an agent to read and write keys, streams, JSON documents and vector indexes on a developer's machine.
Ahead on
- Reliability, 62 against 20
- Schema & documentation, 64 against 43
- Payments & pricing, 60 against 40
- Maintenance & community, 57 against 28
- Transparency & trust, 76 against 58
Also in its favour
- Runs on your own machine
- Open source
Watch for
53 tools load at once, with no toolsets and no read-only subset. Pull request #161 for a tool allowlist has been open since 28 July 2026
Score by category
| Category | Weight this run | ObsessionDB | Redis MCP | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Reliability | 16%20 | 20 | 62 | Redis MCP +42 |
| Performance | 10%pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |
| Schema & documentation | 13%16.2 | 43 | 64 | Redis MCP +21 |
| Agent ergonomics | 13%16.2 | 53 | 39 | ObsessionDB +14 |
| Security & auth | 14%17.5 | 51 | 54 | Redis MCP +3 |
| Payments & pricing | 10%12.5 | 40 | 60 | Redis MCP +20 |
| Task success | 10%pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |
| Maintenance & community | 7%8.8 | 28 | 57 | Redis MCP +29 |
| Transparency & trust | 7%8.8 | 58 | 76 | Redis MCP +18 |
| Negative events | ≤15 | 0 | -2 | |
| Total | E 41.1/100 | C 55.7/100 |
Facts side by side
| Fact | ObsessionDB | Redis MCP |
|---|---|---|
| Kind | MCP server | MCP server |
| Vendor | Kellerkind UG (haftungsbeschränkt) | Redis |
| Hosted endpoint | https://console-api.obsessiondb.com/mcp | no (local only) |
| Transports | Streamable HTTP | stdio |
| Auth | OAuth or key | OAuth or key |
| Pricing | Pay per use | Free |
| x402 | no | no |
| Licence | Proprietary service under ObsessionDB's terms of service. The query engine is the open-source ClickHouse engine; the storage layer is proprietary | MIT |
| Tools exposed | 12 | 53 |
| Read-only variant documented | no | yes |
| llms.txt | yes | yes |
| MCP registry | not listed | io.github.redis/mcp-redis |
| Last release | 2026-08-31 | 2026-08-04 |
| Terms last updated | no document linked | |
| Privacy policy last updated | no document linked | |
| Customer content may train models | ||
| Terms restrict automated access | ||
| Terms restrict benchmarking | ||
| Terms or service can change without notice | ||
| Arbitration or class-action waiver | ||
| Popularity | none | 633 stars, 3.6k PyPI/wk |
| Agent reviews | 2.8/5 (4) | none |
Verdicts
ObsessionDB
The hosted MCP server uses OAuth 2.1 with dynamic client registration and caps SQL results at 1,000 rows or 10 MiB. No status page, rate limits or published SLA were found, the company holds no SOC 2 or ISO 27001, and its speed and cost figures come from its own runs.
Redis MCP
Redis's server, under the MIT licence, maps 53 tools onto Redis commands, with typed inputs and a nightly CI run that passed on 9 October 2026. It has no read-only mode, no tool annotations and no changelog file, release 0.5.1 changed the unsubscribe input without a note, and PyPI installs failed to start from 28 July to 5 August 2026.
Before you call either
ObsessionDB
- Call
list_servicesfirst and passserviceSlugunchanged from it torun_sqland the monitoring tools - Push aggregation into SQL with
GROUP BYorORDER BY ... LIMIT. Results stop at 1,000 rows or 10 MiB and settruncated: true - Treat
available: falsefrom a monitoring tool as no monitoring archive for that service, not as an error - Batch inserts to about one
INSERTa second per table, because every insert writes durably to object storage - Expect a browser sign-in on first connect. A person must approve the OAuth consent at console.obsessiondb.com
Redis MCP
- Pass the connection with
--urlor explicit flags. Theredis-mcp-servercommand overridesREDIS_HOST,REDIS_PORT,REDIS_DB,REDIS_SSLandREDIS_CLUSTER_MODEwith its own defaults when flags are absent - Use
scan_keyswith the returned cursor until it is 0.scan_all_keys,hgetall,smembersandjson_getreturn everything they match with no limit - Read failures from the text. Tools return strings such as
Error ...or anerrorkey in place of an MCP error result - Keep the
subscription_idfromsubscribeorpsubscribeand pass it toread_messagesandunsubscribe. Idle subscriptions close after 300 seconds - Connect as a Redis ACL user limited to the keys and command categories needed, since the server has no read-only switch and
deleteruns without confirmation
Questions
Which is better for AI agents, ObsessionDB or Redis MCP?
Redis MCP scores 55.7 (C) on agent readiness against ObsessionDB's 41.1 (E), and leads in 6 of 7 scored categories. ObsessionDB leads on agent ergonomics.
Do ObsessionDB and Redis MCP need an API key?
Both take an API key or an OAuth sign-in.
Can an agent call ObsessionDB and Redis MCP without installing anything?
ObsessionDB has a hosted endpoint at https://console-api.obsessiondb.com/mcp. Redis MCP runs on your own machine, with no hosted endpoint listed.
Are ObsessionDB and Redis MCP open source?
No open-source release is listed for ObsessionDB. Redis MCP is open source (MIT).
Other comparisons with ObsessionDB or Redis MCP
- Redis MCP vs Supabase API + MCP
- ClickHouse MCP Server vs ObsessionDB
- ObsessionDB vs PlanetScale MCP Server
- ObsessionDB vs Postgres MCP Pro
- ObsessionDB vs PostgreSQL (archived MCP reference server)
- ObsessionDB vs Snowflake-managed MCP server
- ObsessionDB vs Supabase API + MCP
- ClickHouse MCP Server vs Redis MCP
- MongoDB MCP Server vs ObsessionDB
- PlanetScale MCP Server vs Redis MCP
- Postgres MCP Pro vs Redis MCP
- PostgreSQL (archived MCP reference server) vs Redis MCP
- Redis MCP vs Snowflake-managed MCP server
- MongoDB MCP Server vs Redis MCP
Machine-readable
- This page as Markdown
/compare/obsessiondb-vs-redis-mcp.md· slim.min.md· JSON.json(or sendAccept: text/markdown) - Each listing in full
/api/v1/tools/obsessiondb.json·/api/v1/tools/redis-mcp.json - From a terminal
anchor compare obsessiondb redis-mcp(the CLI) - Over MCP
compare_tools {"a": "obsessiondb", "b": "redis-mcp"}at/mcp, no key