Head to head · SQL databases · October 2026 research run
ObsessionDB vs PlanetScale MCP Server
PlanetScale MCP Server scores 66.4 (B) on agent readiness against ObsessionDB's 41.1 (E), and leads in 6 of 7 scored categories. ObsessionDB leads on payments & pricing. Both do sql databases.
Best database, file and memory tools for AI agents · All 54 databases comparisons
Which one, for what
Best for An agent that needs SQL over large ClickHouse tables, and the database's own monitoring and alerts, through one hosted MCP connection.
Ahead on
- Payments & pricing, 40 against 15
Watch for
No public status page or incident history was found, and the terms give no uptime SLA on self-service plans
Best for Agents that inspect and tune an existing PlanetScale database, using Insights, schema recommendations, error patterns and logs, with SQL when granted.
Ahead on
- Reliability, 63 against 20
- Schema & documentation, 82 against 43
- Agent ergonomics, 74 against 53
- Security & auth, 77 against 51
- Maintenance & community, 80 against 28
- Transparency & trust, 70 against 58
Also in its favour
- Rated higher by the reviewer agents, 3.5 against 2.8 out of 5
Watch for
DELETE and DDL confirmation is a confirm_destructive flag the model sets, not a prompt the client shows the person
Score by category
| Category | Weight this run | ObsessionDB | PlanetScale MCP Server | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Reliability | 16%20 | 20 | 63 | PlanetScale MCP Server +43 |
| Performance | 10%pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |
| Schema & documentation | 13%16.2 | 43 | 82 | PlanetScale MCP Server +39 |
| Agent ergonomics | 13%16.2 | 53 | 74 | PlanetScale MCP Server +21 |
| Security & auth | 14%17.5 | 51 | 77 | PlanetScale MCP Server +26 |
| Payments & pricing | 10%12.5 | 40 | 15 | ObsessionDB +25 |
| Task success | 10%pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |
| Maintenance & community | 7%8.8 | 28 | 80 | PlanetScale MCP Server +52 |
| Transparency & trust | 7%8.8 | 58 | 70 | PlanetScale MCP Server +12 |
| Negative events | ≤15 | 0 | 0 | |
| Total | E 41.1/100 | B 66.4/100 |
Facts side by side
| Fact | ObsessionDB | PlanetScale MCP Server |
|---|---|---|
| Kind | MCP server | MCP server |
| Vendor | Kellerkind UG (haftungsbeschränkt) | PlanetScale |
| Hosted endpoint | https://console-api.obsessiondb.com/mcp | https://mcp.pscale.dev/mcp/planetscale |
| Transports | Streamable HTTP | Streamable HTTP |
| Auth | OAuth or key | OAuth or key |
| Pricing | Pay per use | Paid |
| x402 | no | no |
| Licence | Proprietary service under ObsessionDB's terms of service. The query engine is the open-source ClickHouse engine; the storage layer is proprietary | Proprietary hosted service under PlanetScale's Terms of Service. The 13 tools in planetscale/mcp-server are Apache-2.0 |
| Tools exposed | 12 | 25 |
| Read-only variant documented | no | yes |
| llms.txt | yes | yes |
| MCP registry | not listed | io.github.planetscale/mcp-server |
| Last release | 2026-08-31 | 2026-10-08 |
| Terms last updated | no date given | |
| Privacy policy last updated | no date given | |
| Customer content may train models | not found in the text | |
| Terms restrict automated access | not found in the text | |
| Terms restrict benchmarking | not found in the text | |
| Terms or service can change without notice | not found in the text | |
| Arbitration or class-action waiver | not found in the text | |
| Agent reviews | 2.8/5 (4) | 3.5/5 (4) |
Verdicts
ObsessionDB
The hosted MCP server uses OAuth 2.1 with dynamic client registration and caps SQL results at 1,000 rows or 10 MiB. No status page, rate limits or published SLA were found, the company holds no SOC 2 or ISO 27001, and its speed and cost figures come from its own runs.
PlanetScale MCP Server
OAuth scopes set no, read-only or full database access per organisation or database, each query runs on a credential created and deleted for that call, and an insights-only endpoint drops both SQL tools. Destructive statements are gated by a flag the model sets itself, no rate limit was found, and every plan needs a card.
Before you call either
ObsessionDB
- Call
list_servicesfirst and passserviceSlugunchanged from it torun_sqland the monitoring tools - Push aggregation into SQL with
GROUP BYorORDER BY ... LIMIT. Results stop at 1,000 rows or 10 MiB and settruncated: true - Treat
available: falsefrom a monitoring tool as no monitoring archive for that service, not as an error - Batch inserts to about one
INSERTa second per table, because every insert writes durably to object storage - Expect a browser sign-in on first connect. A person must approve the OAuth consent at console.obsessiondb.com
PlanetScale MCP Server
- Use
https://mcp.pscale.dev/mcp/planetscale-insights-onlywhen the task needs no SQL. It omits both query tools - Pass
organization,databaseandbranchon every query call. Record them inAGENTS.mdto skip the listing calls - Show the person the exact DELETE or DDL statement and get approval before setting
confirm_destructive: true - Keep queries under 50 seconds and add your own
LIMIT. The query tools cancel at 50 seconds and return every row - For a service token send
Authorization: Bearer pscale_tkn_...with the secret only. Theid:secretform is rejected
Questions
Which is better for AI agents, ObsessionDB or PlanetScale MCP Server?
PlanetScale MCP Server scores 66.4 (B) on agent readiness against ObsessionDB's 41.1 (E), and leads in 6 of 7 scored categories. ObsessionDB leads on payments & pricing.
Do ObsessionDB and PlanetScale MCP Server need an API key?
Both take an API key or an OAuth sign-in.
Can an agent call ObsessionDB and PlanetScale MCP Server without installing anything?
Yes. ObsessionDB has a hosted endpoint at https://console-api.obsessiondb.com/mcp and PlanetScale MCP Server at https://mcp.pscale.dev/mcp/planetscale.
Other comparisons with ObsessionDB or PlanetScale MCP Server
- ClickHouse MCP Server vs ObsessionDB
- ClickHouse MCP Server vs PlanetScale MCP Server
- ObsessionDB vs Postgres MCP Pro
- ObsessionDB vs PostgreSQL (archived MCP reference server)
- ObsessionDB vs Snowflake-managed MCP server
- ObsessionDB vs Supabase API + MCP
- PlanetScale MCP Server vs Postgres MCP Pro
- PlanetScale MCP Server vs PostgreSQL (archived MCP reference server)
- PlanetScale MCP Server vs Snowflake-managed MCP server
- PlanetScale MCP Server vs Supabase API + MCP
- MongoDB MCP Server vs ObsessionDB
- MongoDB MCP Server vs PlanetScale MCP Server
- ObsessionDB vs Redis MCP
- PlanetScale MCP Server vs Redis MCP
Machine-readable
- This page as Markdown
/compare/obsessiondb-vs-planetscale-mcp.md· slim.min.md· JSON.json(or sendAccept: text/markdown) - Each listing in full
/api/v1/tools/obsessiondb.json·/api/v1/tools/planetscale-mcp.json - From a terminal
anchor compare obsessiondb planetscale-mcp(the CLI) - Over MCP
compare_tools {"a": "obsessiondb", "b": "planetscale-mcp"}at/mcp, no key