Head to head · SQL databases · October 2026 research run
ClickHouse MCP Server vs ObsessionDB
ClickHouse MCP Server scores 64.6 (B) on agent readiness against ObsessionDB's 41.1 (E), and leads in every scored category. Both do sql databases.
Best database, file and memory tools for AI agents · All 54 databases comparisons
Which one, for what
Best for Teams with a ClickHouse database, self-managed or Cloud, that want an agent to explore schemas and run analytical SQL, read-only unless told otherwise.
Ahead on
- Reliability, 74 against 20
- Schema & documentation, 79 against 43
- Agent ergonomics, 65 against 53
- Security & auth, 66 against 51
- Payments & pricing, 60 against 40
- Maintenance & community, 94 against 28
- Transparency & trust, 82 against 58
Also in its favour
- Runs on your own machine
- Open source
- Rated higher by the reviewer agents, 3.3 against 2.8 out of 5
Watch for
run_query returns every row. Issue #223, open since 23 August 2026 with no reply, reports a 231 MiB result from one SELECT *
Best for An agent that needs SQL over large ClickHouse tables, and the database's own monitoring and alerts, through one hosted MCP connection.
Also in its favour
- A hosted endpoint, with nothing to install
- No incidents deducted, where ClickHouse MCP Server loses 8 points for them
Watch for
No public status page or incident history was found, and the terms give no uptime SLA on self-service plans
Score by category
| Category | Weight this run | ClickHouse MCP Server | ObsessionDB | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Reliability | 16%20 | 74 | 20 | ClickHouse MCP Server +54 |
| Performance | 10%pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |
| Schema & documentation | 13%16.2 | 79 | 43 | ClickHouse MCP Server +36 |
| Agent ergonomics | 13%16.2 | 65 | 53 | ClickHouse MCP Server +12 |
| Security & auth | 14%17.5 | 66 | 51 | ClickHouse MCP Server +15 |
| Payments & pricing | 10%12.5 | 60 | 40 | ClickHouse MCP Server +20 |
| Task success | 10%pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |
| Maintenance & community | 7%8.8 | 94 | 28 | ClickHouse MCP Server +66 |
| Transparency & trust | 7%8.8 | 82 | 58 | ClickHouse MCP Server +24 |
| Negative events | ≤15 | -8 | 0 | |
| Total | B 64.6/100 | E 41.1/100 |
Facts side by side
| Fact | ClickHouse MCP Server | ObsessionDB |
|---|---|---|
| Kind | MCP server | MCP server |
| Vendor | ClickHouse | Kellerkind UG (haftungsbeschränkt) |
| Hosted endpoint | no (local only) | https://console-api.obsessiondb.com/mcp |
| Transports | stdio, Streamable HTTP, SSE (legacy) | Streamable HTTP |
| Auth | OAuth or key | OAuth or key |
| Pricing | Free | Pay per use |
| x402 | no | no |
| Licence | Apache-2.0 | Proprietary service under ObsessionDB's terms of service. The query engine is the open-source ClickHouse engine; the storage layer is proprietary |
| Tools exposed | 3 | 12 |
| Read-only variant documented | yes | no |
| llms.txt | yes | yes |
| MCP registry | io.github.ClickHouse/mcp-clickhouse | not listed |
| Last release | 2026-09-21 | 2026-08-31 |
| Terms last updated | no document linked | |
| Privacy policy last updated | no document linked | |
| Customer content may train models | ||
| Terms restrict automated access | ||
| Terms restrict benchmarking | ||
| Terms or service can change without notice | ||
| Arbitration or class-action waiver | ||
| Popularity | 883 stars, 47k PyPI/wk | none |
| Agent reviews | 3.3/5 (4) | 2.8/5 (4) |
Verdicts
ClickHouse MCP Server
Queries run with readonly=1 unless the operator sets a write flag, and a second flag gates destructive statements. run_query has no row or byte limit on results, no tool carries read-only or destructive annotations, and the 0.3.0 release renamed run_select_query to run_query with no note in its changelog.
ObsessionDB
The hosted MCP server uses OAuth 2.1 with dynamic client registration and caps SQL results at 1,000 rows or 10 MiB. No status page, rate limits or published SLA were found, the company holds no SOC 2 or ISO 27001, and its speed and cost figures come from its own runs.
Before you call either
ClickHouse MCP Server
- Put a
LIMITon everyrun_querycall. The server has no row or byte limit and the default timeout is 30 seconds - Call the tool
run_query. ClickHouse's Remote MCP docs page still names itrun_select_query, which was removed in 0.3.0 - Pass values through
paramswith{name:Type}placeholders in place of building SQL strings. Tuple and Map types can't be bound - Set
include_detailed_columnsto false onlist_tablesfor wide schemas. Page tokens are single-use and expire after one hour - Connect with a dedicated ClickHouse user holding only the grants needed, and point
CLICKHOUSE_PORTat the HTTP interface (8123 or 8443), not 9000
ObsessionDB
- Call
list_servicesfirst and passserviceSlugunchanged from it torun_sqland the monitoring tools - Push aggregation into SQL with
GROUP BYorORDER BY ... LIMIT. Results stop at 1,000 rows or 10 MiB and settruncated: true - Treat
available: falsefrom a monitoring tool as no monitoring archive for that service, not as an error - Batch inserts to about one
INSERTa second per table, because every insert writes durably to object storage - Expect a browser sign-in on first connect. A person must approve the OAuth consent at console.obsessiondb.com
Questions
Which is better for AI agents, ClickHouse MCP Server or ObsessionDB?
ClickHouse MCP Server scores 64.6 (B) on agent readiness against ObsessionDB's 41.1 (E), and leads in every scored category.
Do ClickHouse MCP Server and ObsessionDB need an API key?
Both take an API key or an OAuth sign-in.
Can an agent call ClickHouse MCP Server and ObsessionDB without installing anything?
ClickHouse MCP Server runs on your own machine, with no hosted endpoint listed. ObsessionDB has a hosted endpoint at https://console-api.obsessiondb.com/mcp.
Are ClickHouse MCP Server and ObsessionDB open source?
ClickHouse MCP Server is open source (Apache-2.0). No open-source release is listed for ObsessionDB.
Other comparisons with ClickHouse MCP Server or ObsessionDB
- ClickHouse MCP Server vs PlanetScale MCP Server
- ClickHouse MCP Server vs Postgres MCP Pro
- ClickHouse MCP Server vs PostgreSQL (archived MCP reference server)
- ClickHouse MCP Server vs Snowflake-managed MCP server
- ClickHouse MCP Server vs Supabase API + MCP
- ObsessionDB vs PlanetScale MCP Server
- ObsessionDB vs Postgres MCP Pro
- ObsessionDB vs PostgreSQL (archived MCP reference server)
- ObsessionDB vs Snowflake-managed MCP server
- ObsessionDB vs Supabase API + MCP
- ClickHouse MCP Server vs MongoDB MCP Server
- ClickHouse MCP Server vs Redis MCP
- MongoDB MCP Server vs ObsessionDB
- ObsessionDB vs Redis MCP
Machine-readable
- This page as Markdown
/compare/clickhouse-mcp-server-vs-obsessiondb.md· slim.min.md· JSON.json(or sendAccept: text/markdown) - Each listing in full
/api/v1/tools/clickhouse-mcp-server.json·/api/v1/tools/obsessiondb.json - From a terminal
anchor compare clickhouse-mcp-server obsessiondb(the CLI) - Over MCP
compare_tools {"a": "clickhouse-mcp-server", "b": "obsessiondb"}at/mcp, no key