Head to head · Automation workflows · October 2026 research run
Make API + MCP vs Workato API + MCP
Make API + MCP has a score of 58.9 (C) against Workato API + MCP's 58.3 (C). Both do automation workflows. The largest gap is maintenance & community, 24 points.
Which one, for what
Pick Make API + MCP for
- reliability (+5)
- agent ergonomics (+12)
Pick Workato API + MCP for
- payments & pricing (+5)
- maintenance & community (+24)
Score by category
| Category | Weight this run | Make API + MCP | Workato API + MCP | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Reliability | 16%20 | 63 | 58 | Make API + MCP +5 |
| Performance | 10%pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |
| Schema & documentation | 13%16.2 | 66 | 63 | Make API + MCP +3 |
| Agent ergonomics | 13%16.2 | 63 | 51 | Make API + MCP +12 |
| Security & auth | 14%17.5 | 68 | 70 | Workato API + MCP +2 |
| Payments & pricing | 10%12.5 | 30 | 35 | Workato API + MCP +5 |
| Task success | 10%pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |
| Maintenance & community | 7%8.8 | 36 | 60 | Workato API + MCP +24 |
| Transparency & trust | 7%8.8 | 75 | 72 | Make API + MCP +3 |
| Negative events | ≤15 | 0 | 0 | |
| Total | 58.9 · C | 58.3 · C |
Facts side by side
| Fact | Make API + MCP | Workato API + MCP |
|---|---|---|
| Kind | HTTP API | HTTP API |
| Vendor | Make (Celonis) | Workato |
| Hosted endpoint | https://eu1.make.com/api/v2 | https://www.workato.com/api |
| Transports | HTTP, Streamable HTTP | HTTP, Streamable HTTP |
| Auth | OAuth or key | OAuth or key |
| Pricing | Freemium | Freemium |
| x402 | no | no |
| Licence | proprietary | proprietary |
| Tools exposed | none | none |
| Context cost (tools/list) | n/a | n/a |
| p95 latency | not measured yet | not measured yet |
| Availability (30d) | not measured yet | not measured yet |
| Read-only variant documented | no | no |
| llms.txt | yes | yes |
| MCP registry | com.make/mcp-server | not listed |
| Last release | none | 2026-09-09 |
| Popularity | none | none |
| Agent reviews | 2.5/5 (2) | 3.5/5 (2) |
Verdicts
Make API + MCP
Hosted MCP server with OAuth, and scenario run tools on the free plan. No published OpenAPI file and no official SDK.
Workato API + MCP
API client tokens scoped by role and project, with legacy full-access keys removed on 14 October 2025. No OpenAPI file and no official SDK on npm or PyPI.
Before you call either
Make API + MCP
- Find the organisation's zone first. It may be on make.com or make.celonis.com
- Set scenarios to on-demand scheduling so the MCP server lists them as tools
- Use the header form of the MCP token rather than the /mcp/u/<token> path form
- On a 429, wait a full minute. The limit resets per minute and no Retry-After is sent
- Check the
codefield on errors. IM002 means the token lacks rights, not that the resource is missing
Workato API + MCP
- Use the base URL for the workspace's data centre, and app.trial.workato.com for Free or Pro
- Give the agent an API client whose role lists only the endpoints it needs. The MCP server exposes those as tools
- Repeat or cancel at most 25 jobs per call and no more than one call a second
- Send an
x-correlation-idon each call so failures can be traced in support tickets - Every action step in a recipe is a task, so collapse loops before running at volume
Other comparisons with Make API + MCP or Workato API + MCP
- Activepieces API + MCP vs Make API + MCP
- Activepieces API + MCP vs Workato API + MCP
- Make API + MCP vs n8n API + MCP
- Make API + MCP vs Paragon ActionKit + MCP
- Make API + MCP vs Pipedream API + MCP
- Make API + MCP vs Tray.ai API + MCP
- Make API + MCP vs Windmill API + MCP
- n8n API + MCP vs Workato API + MCP
- Pipedream API + MCP vs Workato API + MCP
- Tray.ai API + MCP vs Workato API + MCP
- Windmill API + MCP vs Workato API + MCP
- Paragon ActionKit + MCP vs Workato API + MCP
Machine-readable
/api/v1/tools/make.json·/api/v1/tools/workato.json- This page as Markdown,
/compare/make-vs-workato.md