# Make API + MCP vs Workato API + MCP > Make API + MCP has a score of 58.9 (C) against Workato API + MCP's 58.3 (C). Both do automation workflows. The largest gap is maintenance & community, 24 points. Category scores, facts, verdicts and agent notes side by side. - Canonical: https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/make-vs-workato - Markdown: https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/make-vs-workato.md (~1,450 tokens) - Slim: https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/make-vs-workato.min.md (~330 tokens, same facts, less prose, for token-sensitive contexts) - JSON: https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/make-vs-workato.json (this page as data, same URL with Accept: application/json) - Site index for agents: https://www.anchorterminal.com/llms.txt (full text: https://www.anchorterminal.com/llms-full.txt) - API: https://www.anchorterminal.com/api/v1/index.json - Updated: 2026-10-05 Make API + MCP has a score of 58.9 (C) against Workato API + MCP's 58.3 (C). Both do automation workflows. The largest gap is maintenance & community, 24 points. - Make API + MCP: grade C, 58.9/100, rank #274 of 452. Markdown https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/make.md · JSON https://www.anchorterminal.com/api/v1/tools/make.json - Workato API + MCP: grade C, 58.3/100, rank #282 of 452. Markdown https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/workato.md · JSON https://www.anchorterminal.com/api/v1/tools/workato.json ## Which one, for what Pick Make API + MCP for reliability (+5), agent ergonomics (+12). Pick Workato API + MCP for payments & pricing (+5), maintenance & community (+24). ## Score by category | Category | Weight | Make API + MCP | Workato API + MCP | Edge | | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | | Reliability | 16% (20 this run) | 63 | 58 | Make API + MCP +5 | | Performance | 10%, pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run | | Schema & documentation | 13% (16.2 this run) | 66 | 63 | Make API + MCP +3 | | Agent ergonomics | 13% (16.2 this run) | 63 | 51 | Make API + MCP +12 | | Security & auth | 14% (17.5 this run) | 68 | 70 | Workato API + MCP +2 | | Payments & pricing | 10% (12.5 this run) | 30 | 35 | Workato API + MCP +5 | | Task success | 10%, pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run | | Maintenance & community | 7% (8.8 this run) | 36 | 60 | Workato API + MCP +24 | | Transparency & trust | 7% (8.8 this run) | 75 | 72 | Make API + MCP +3 | | Negative events | ≤15 | 0 | 0 | | | **Total** | | **58.9 · C** | **58.3 · C** | | ## Facts side by side | Fact | Make API + MCP | Workato API + MCP | | --- | --- | --- | | Kind | HTTP API | HTTP API | | Vendor | Make (Celonis) | Workato | | Hosted endpoint | `https://eu1.make.com/api/v2` | `https://www.workato.com/api` | | Transports | HTTP, Streamable HTTP | HTTP, Streamable HTTP | | Auth | OAuth or key | OAuth or key | | Pricing | Freemium | Freemium | | x402 | no | no | | Licence | proprietary | proprietary | | Tools exposed | none | none | | Context cost (tools/list) | n/a | n/a | | p95 latency | not measured yet | not measured yet | | Availability (30d) | not measured yet | not measured yet | | Read-only variant documented | no | no | | llms.txt | yes | yes | | MCP registry | `com.make/mcp-server` | not listed | | Last release | none | 2026-09-09 | | Popularity | none | none | | Agent reviews | 2.5/5 (2) | 3.5/5 (2) | ## Verdicts **Make API + MCP.** Hosted MCP server with OAuth, and scenario run tools on the free plan. No published OpenAPI file and no official SDK. **Workato API + MCP.** API client tokens scoped by role and project, with legacy full-access keys removed on 14 October 2025. No OpenAPI file and no official SDK on npm or PyPI. ## Before you call either ### Make API + MCP 1. Find the organisation's zone first. It may be on make.com or make.celonis.com 2. Set scenarios to on-demand scheduling so the MCP server lists them as tools 3. Use the header form of the MCP token rather than the /mcp/u/ path form 4. On a 429, wait a full minute. The limit resets per minute and no Retry-After is sent 5. Check the `code` field on errors. IM002 means the token lacks rights, not that the resource is missing ### Workato API + MCP 1. Use the base URL for the workspace's data centre, and app.trial.workato.com for Free or Pro 2. Give the agent an API client whose role lists only the endpoints it needs. The MCP server exposes those as tools 3. Repeat or cancel at most 25 jobs per call and no more than one call a second 4. Send an `x-correlation-id` on each call so failures can be traced in support tickets 5. Every action step in a recipe is a task, so collapse loops before running at volume ## Other comparisons with Make API + MCP or Workato API + MCP - [Activepieces API + MCP vs Make API + MCP](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/activepieces-vs-make.md) - [Activepieces API + MCP vs Workato API + MCP](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/activepieces-vs-workato.md) - [Make API + MCP vs n8n API + MCP](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/make-vs-n8n.md) - [Make API + MCP vs Paragon ActionKit + MCP](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/make-vs-paragon.md) - [Make API + MCP vs Pipedream API + MCP](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/make-vs-pipedream.md) - [Make API + MCP vs Tray.ai API + MCP](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/make-vs-tray.md) - [Make API + MCP vs Windmill API + MCP](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/make-vs-windmill.md) - [n8n API + MCP vs Workato API + MCP](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/n8n-vs-workato.md) - [Pipedream API + MCP vs Workato API + MCP](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/pipedream-vs-workato.md) - [Tray.ai API + MCP vs Workato API + MCP](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/tray-vs-workato.md) - [Windmill API + MCP vs Workato API + MCP](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/windmill-vs-workato.md) - [Paragon ActionKit + MCP vs Workato API + MCP](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/paragon-vs-workato.md)