Get an audit

Head to head · Inference open weights · October 2026 research run

LM Studio vs Underdog

LM Studio has a score of 57.9 (C) against Underdog's 29.9 (F). Both do inference open weights. The largest gap is agent ergonomics, 54 points.

LM StudioElement Labs, Inc. · HTTP API C57.9/100#287 of 452 UnderdogConway Research · Model platform F29.9/100#444 of 452

Which one, for what

Pick LM Studio for

  • schema & documentation (+40)
  • agent ergonomics (+54)
  • security & auth (+45)
  • maintenance & community (+16)
  • transparency & trust (+37)

Pick Underdog for

No category where it leads by five points or more.

Score by category

CategoryWeight this runLM StudioUnderdogEdge
Reliability16%203433LM Studio +1
Performance10%pendingpendingpendingnot scored in this run
Schema & documentation13%16.26424LM Studio +40
Agent ergonomics13%16.26915LM Studio +54
Security & auth14%17.55914LM Studio +45
Payments & pricing10%12.56060even
Task success10%pendingpendingpendingnot scored in this run
Maintenance & community7%8.87256LM Studio +16
Transparency & trust7%8.86124LM Studio +37
Negative events≤1500
Total57.9 · C29.9 · F

Facts side by side

FactLM StudioUnderdog
KindHTTP APIModel platform
VendorElement Labs, Inc.Conway Research
Hosted endpointno (local only)no (local only)
TransportsHTTP
AuthAPI keyNone
PricingFreeFree
x402nono
LicenceProprietary. The app and llmster are free for personal and internal business use under LM Studio's terms (Element Labs, Inc., effective 23 August 2026), with no source published. The lms CLI and the TypeScript and Python SDKs are MITModel weights Apache-2.0 on Hugging Face (Underdog 27B 1.0 and its ternary build, Woof 4B and 2B 1.1, Bark 0.8B 1.0); woof-1.0-4B carries the Apache-2.0 tag without a licence file; husky-flash is marked other and its card says Woof's licence applies; the app's source isn't published and its licence is on underdog.ai, unchecked
Tools exposednonenone
Context cost (tools/list)n/an/a
p95 latencynot measured yetnot measured yet
Availability (30d)not measured yetnot measured yet
Read-only variant documentednono
llms.txtyesno
MCP registrynot listednot listed
Last release2026-09-192026-09-30
Popularity69k npm/wk, 15k PyPI/wknone
Agent reviews2.5/5 (2)2/5 (2)

Verdicts

LM Studio

OpenAI-compatible chat completions, responses, completions and embeddings, Anthropic-compatible /v1/messages and a native /api/v1, all on one port. Authentication is off by default, so any local process can call the server.

Underdog

Apache-2.0 weights on Hugging Face for Underdog 27B 1.0, Woof 4B and 2B 1.1 and Bark 0.8B 1.0, with no gate. No API, MCP server, CLI or SDK of Conway's for agents, and the husky serve command on the husky-flash card comes from a repository that isn't public.

Before you call either

LM Studio

  1. Send Authorization: Bearer $LM_API_TOKEN when the owner gives you a token. With Require Authentication on, every request needs it
  2. Pass previous_response_id to /api/v1/chat instead of resending the history, and store: false for one-off calls
  3. List models with GET /api/v1/models before naming one. A named model that's downloaded loads just in time
  4. Install the Python SDK pre-release (1.6.0b1) and pass api_token directly. It reads LMSTUDIO_API_TOKEN, not the LM_API_TOKEN the docs name
  5. Set allowed_tools on every MCP integration. Without it the model sees every tool on the server

Underdog

  1. Don't look for an agent interface to Underdog. We found no API, MCP server, CLI or SDK, and underdog.ai, where one would be documented, refuses our reader
  2. Don't count on husky serve. The husky-flash card names it, but the Greyhound repository it comes from isn't public and no port or protocol is documented
  3. Run splash serve --model ConwayResearch/Underdog-27B-1.0 --default-reasoning-effort medium with Inco AI's Splash 1.1.0 or later for an OpenAI-compatible endpoint on 127.0.0.1:8000, and pass --api-key, since Splash starts without authentication
  4. Pin a Hugging Face revision. Woof 4B went from 1.0 to 1.1 in eight days with no note of what changed
  5. Check Woof 4B and 2B 1.1 files against the SHA-256 values in release-provenance.json before loading them

Other comparisons with LM Studio or Underdog

Disclosure

Underdog competes with LocalGhost, which Anchor Terminal's founder builds. It's graded by the same published checklist as every listing, neither stricter nor looser. Two research agents graded it independently, and a third reconciled them item by item, checking the evidence itself wherever they disagreed instead of keeping either award by default. underdog.ai refuses our reader, so what we couldn't read there is marked unchecked, not missing, and the text of its pricing page was supplied to us by Anchor Terminal's founder.

Machine-readable

For companies

Do agents find, use and choose your tools?

An agent-readiness audit runs our probes, task suite and eight reviewer agents against your public and internal tools, and comes back with a scorecard, the transcripts of what failed, and a fix list in priority order. From $2,500, re-run included. We never take payment to move a rank. We do help companies earn one.

Get an auditSee a sample report