{ "data": { "a": { "slug": "lm-studio", "name": "LM Studio", "vendor": "Element Labs, Inc.", "vendorUrl": "https://lmstudio.ai", "kind": "http-api", "category": "local-ai", "summary": "Desktop app and headless daemon from Element Labs for running open-weight models on the owner's machine with llama.cpp and MLX, plus the Splash engine on Apple silicon M3 or newer since 0.4.25.", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/lm-studio", "markdownUrl": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/lm-studio.md", "slimMarkdownUrl": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/lm-studio.min.md", "jsonUrl": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/api/v1/tools/lm-studio.json", "repo": "https://github.com/lmstudio-ai/lmstudio-js", "license": "Proprietary. The app and llmster are free for personal and internal business use under LM Studio's terms (Element Labs, Inc., effective 23 August 2026), with no source published. The `lms` CLI and the TypeScript and Python SDKs are MIT", "transports": [ "http" ], "packages": [ { "registry": "npm", "name": "@lmstudio/sdk" }, { "registry": "pypi", "name": "lmstudio" } ], "auth": "api-key", "authNotes": "No authentication by default. With Require Authentication on (Developer page, Server Settings, LM Studio 0.4.0 or later), every request needs an API token (`sk-lm-` prefix) as `Authorization: Bearer`, or `x-api-key` on the Anthropic-compatible endpoint. Tokens are named, carry permissions picked at creation, are shown once and can be edited or deleted. Calling the owner's mcp.json servers through the API needs authentication on. The server binds to localhost unless Serve on Local Network is on or `lms server start --bind 0.0.0.0` is used.", "pricing": "free", "pricingNotes": "The LM Studio app, llmster and the local server are free for personal and work use with no account or card (free at work since 8 July 2025, and the terms of 23 August 2026 cover internal business use). Element Labs sells cloud model plans for Bionic, its separate agent app, at $20 (Bionic+) and $100 (Pro) a month, which local use of LM Studio doesn't need (checked 2026-10-03).", "priceSummary": "Free", "where": "local", "x402": { "level": "no", "evidence": "No x402, MPP or L402 in the docs, the pricing page or the SDK source (checked 2026-10-03).", "endpoints": [] }, "toolCount": null, "popularity": { "githubStars": null, "npmWeekly": 69495, "pypiWeekly": 15195, "asOf": "2026-10-03" }, "docsUrl": "https://lmstudio.ai/docs/developer", "llmsTxt": "https://lmstudio.ai/llms.txt", "capabilities": [ "inference.local", "inference.open-weights", "agent.mcp-client", "embed.text" ], "tags": [ "local", "closed-source", "free", "no-card", "account-free", "openai-compatible", "llms-txt", "typescript", "python", "streaming", "pre-1.0" ], "lastRelease": "2026-09-19", "graded": true, "anchor": { "graded": true, "score": 57.9, "grade": "C", "agentReady": false, "rank": 287, "ranked": true, "rankOf": 452, "categoryRank": 4, "methodology": "0.3", "run": "2026-10-01", "scores": { "ergonomics": 69, "maintenance": 72, "payments": 60, "reliability": 34, "schema": 64, "security": 59, "transparency": 61 }, "pending": [ "performance", "tasks" ], "assessment": { "confidence": "medium", "date": "2026-10-03" }, "negative": 0, "verdict": "OpenAI-compatible chat completions, responses, completions and embeddings, Anthropic-compatible /v1/messages and a native /api/v1, all on one port. Authentication is off by default, so any local process can call the server.", "strengths": [ "OpenAI-compatible chat completions, responses, completions and embeddings, Anthropic-compatible /v1/messages and a native /api/v1, all on one port", "llmster, a headless daemon installed with one command, with a documented systemd setup for Linux servers", "Named API tokens with permissions, and API access to MCP servers behind two switches, one of which also needs authentication on", "Stateful chats with `previous_response_id`, `allowed_tools` per MCP integration and typed error objects", "Seven releases in the 90 days to 3 October 2026, each with dated notes" ], "weaknesses": [ "Authentication is off by default, so any local process can call the server", "Closed-source app and daemon with no public CI or test suite", "The Python SDK's last stable release (1.5.0, 22 August 2025) can't send API tokens, and the docs name an environment variable no release reads", "No OpenAPI file, and the llms.txt we read covers the 0.3 app, not the v1 REST API, tokens, llmster or MCP", "1.7k open issues in the public bug tracker" ], "agentNotes": [ "Send `Authorization: Bearer $LM_API_TOKEN` when the owner gives you a token. With Require Authentication on, every request needs it", "Pass `previous_response_id` to /api/v1/chat instead of resending the history, and `store: false` for one-off calls", "List models with `GET /api/v1/models` before naming one. A named model that's downloaded loads just in time", "Install the Python SDK pre-release (1.6.0b1) and pass `api_token` directly. It reads `LMSTUDIO_API_TOKEN`, not the `LM_API_TOKEN` the docs name", "Set `allowed_tools` on every MCP integration. Without it the model sees every tool on the server" ], "metrics": { "kind": "local", "measured": false }, "reviewCount": 2, "avgRating": 2.5, "history": [ { "basis": "public evidence", "confidence": "medium", "grade": "C", "methodology": "0.3", "pending": [ "performance", "tasks" ], "run": "2026-10-01", "runLabel": "October 2026 research run", "score": 57.9 } ], "editorialScores": { "ergonomics": 69, "maintenance": 72, "payments": 60, "reliability": 34, "schema": 64, "security": 59, "transparency": 55 }, "provenanceScore": 67 }, "connect": { "install": "curl -fsSL https://lmstudio.ai/install.sh | bash # llmster, the headless daemon. Windows: irm https://lmstudio.ai/install.ps1 | iex", "http": "curl http://localhost:1234/api/v1/chat \\\n -H \"Authorization: Bearer $LM_API_TOKEN\" \\\n -H \"Content-Type: application/json\" \\\n -d '{\"model\": \"ibm/granite-4-micro\", \"input\": \"Write a short haiku about sunrise.\"}'", "claudeCode": "export ANTHROPIC_BASE_URL=http://localhost:1234\nexport ANTHROPIC_AUTH_TOKEN=lmstudio\nexport CLAUDE_CODE_ATTRIBUTION_HEADER=0\nclaude --model openai/gpt-oss-20b" }, "letme": { "capability": "https://letme.dev/inference.local", "tool": "https://letme.dev/lm-studio" }, "area": "models", "provenance": { "legalEntity": "Element Labs, Inc.", "domain": "lmstudio.ai", "domainRegistered": "2023-05-03", "endpointOnVendorDomain": null, "terms": "https://lmstudio.ai/app-terms", "privacy": "https://lmstudio.ai/app-privacy", "statusPage": "", "changelog": "https://lmstudio.ai/changelog/lmstudio", "securityTxt": "none", "checked": "2026-10-03", "notes": [ "The terms (effective 23 August 2026) and the privacy policy (effective June 2026) name Element Labs, Inc., a Delaware corporation at 251 Little Falls Drive, Wilmington.", "There's no hosted endpoint. The server answers on the owner's machine, at localhost:1234 by default.", "lmstudio.ai/.well-known/security.txt returns a Hub web page rather than a security.txt, and we found no security page or SECURITY.md in the public repositories.", "RDAP for lmstudio.ai gives a registration date of 2023-05-03.", "lmstudio.ai/changelog opens on Bionic, the separate agent app. LM Studio's releases are at /changelog/lmstudio." ], "score": 67 }, "pageJsonUrl": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/lm-studio.json", "live": { "slug": "lm-studio", "versions": [ { "registry": "npm", "name": "@lmstudio/sdk", "version": "2.0.0", "seenAt": "2026-10-04T16:31:57.979163993Z" }, { "registry": "pypi", "name": "lmstudio", "version": "1.5.0", "released": "2025-08-22", "seenAt": "2026-10-04T16:32:00.101781677Z" } ], "githubStars": 1786, "npmWeekly": 61084, "pypiWeekly": 14795, "securityTxt": { "url": "https://lmstudio.ai/.well-known/security.txt", "state": "none", "checkedAt": "2026-10-04T15:15:43.57855822Z" }, "llmsTxt": { "url": "https://lmstudio.ai/llms.txt", "ok": true, "status": 200, "checkedAt": "2026-10-04T15:17:57.079569518Z" }, "domain": { "domain": "lmstudio.ai", "registered": "2023-05-03", "source": "https://rdap.identitydigital.services/rdap/domain/lmstudio.ai", "checkedAt": "2026-10-04T13:08:39.466212979Z" }, "pages": [ { "url": "https://lmstudio.ai/changelog/lmstudio", "kind": "changelog", "status": 200, "checkedAt": "2026-10-04T15:45:43.124111793Z", "changedAt": "0001-01-01T00:00:00Z", "fingerprint": "861d11ad807a" }, { "url": "https://lmstudio.ai/app-privacy", "kind": "privacy", "status": 200, "checkedAt": "2026-10-04T15:45:38.584198725Z", "changedAt": "0001-01-01T00:00:00Z", "fingerprint": "2be7166b913e" }, { "url": "https://lmstudio.ai/app-terms", "kind": "terms", "status": 200, "checkedAt": "2026-10-04T15:45:40.97136456Z", "changedAt": "0001-01-01T00:00:00Z", "fingerprint": "90222f50fb4b" } ], "updatedAt": "2026-10-04T16:32:00.291286961Z" } }, "b": { "slug": "underdog", "name": "Underdog", "vendor": "Conway Research", "vendorUrl": "https://underdog.ai", "kind": "platform", "category": "local-ai", "summary": "A personal AI from Conway Research that runs on the owner's Mac with Apple silicon.", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/underdog", "markdownUrl": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/underdog.md", "slimMarkdownUrl": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/underdog.min.md", "jsonUrl": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/api/v1/tools/underdog.json", "license": "Model weights Apache-2.0 on Hugging Face (Underdog 27B 1.0 and its ternary build, Woof 4B and 2B 1.1, Bark 0.8B 1.0); woof-1.0-4B carries the Apache-2.0 tag without a licence file; husky-flash is marked other and its card says Woof's licence applies; the app's source isn't published and its licence is on underdog.ai, unchecked", "transports": [], "packages": [], "auth": "none", "authNotes": "No API, MCP server, CLI or credential for agents from Conway found as of 3 October 2026. The husky-flash card names `husky serve --model ConwayResearch/husky-flash` from an \"Underdog Greyhound repository\" that isn't public, with no port or protocol documented. Conway's 27B cards run the weights through Inco AI's Splash, which listens on `127.0.0.1:8000` with an OpenAI-compatible API and no authentication unless `--api-key` is set. The weights download from Hugging Face without a gate, though the 27B card says to run `hf auth login` first. underdog.ai, whose robots.txt refuses our reader, is unchecked.", "pricing": "free", "pricingNotes": "Free. Underdog's pricing page says \"100% free\", \"Free forever? Yes. It's your computer doing the work\" and \"There is nothing to bill you for\", with no paid tier (text supplied on 3 October 2026, because underdog.ai refuses our reader). The model weights are free Apache-2.0 downloads on Hugging Face with no login or card. The page links a sign-in, and whether the app needs an account is unchecked.", "priceSummary": "Free", "where": "local", "x402": { "level": "no", "evidence": "No payment protocol on conway.tech, husky.underdog.ai, Conway's Hugging Face organisation or its GitHub repositories (3 October 2026); underdog.ai unchecked.", "endpoints": [] }, "toolCount": null, "popularity": { "githubStars": null, "npmWeekly": null, "pypiWeekly": null, "asOf": "2026-10-03" }, "capabilities": [ "inference.open-weights", "speech.stt" ], "tags": [ "local", "apple-silicon", "open-weights", "mlx" ], "lastRelease": "2026-09-30", "graded": true, "disclosure": "Underdog competes with LocalGhost, which Anchor Terminal's founder builds. It's graded by the same published checklist as every listing, neither stricter nor looser. Two research agents graded it independently, and a third reconciled them item by item, checking the evidence itself wherever they disagreed instead of keeping either award by default. underdog.ai refuses our reader, so what we couldn't read there is marked unchecked, not missing, and the text of its pricing page was supplied to us by Anchor Terminal's founder.", "competesWith": "localghost", "anchor": { "graded": true, "score": 29.9, "grade": "F", "agentReady": false, "rank": 444, "ranked": true, "rankOf": 452, "categoryRank": 12, "methodology": "0.3", "run": "2026-10-01", "scores": { "ergonomics": 15, "maintenance": 56, "payments": 60, "reliability": 33, "schema": 24, "security": 14, "transparency": 24 }, "pending": [ "performance", "tasks" ], "assessment": { "confidence": "low", "date": "2026-10-03" }, "negative": 0, "verdict": "Apache-2.0 weights on Hugging Face for Underdog 27B 1.0, Woof 4B and 2B 1.1 and Bark 0.8B 1.0, with no gate. No API, MCP server, CLI or SDK of Conway's for agents, and the `husky serve` command on the husky-flash card comes from a repository that isn't public.", "disclosure": "Underdog competes with LocalGhost, which Anchor Terminal's founder builds. It's graded by the same published checklist as every listing, neither stricter nor looser. Two research agents graded it independently, and a third reconciled them item by item, checking the evidence itself wherever they disagreed instead of keeping either award by default. underdog.ai refuses our reader, so what we couldn't read there is marked unchecked, not missing, and the text of its pricing page was supplied to us by Anchor Terminal's founder.", "strengths": [ "Apache-2.0 weights on Hugging Face for Underdog 27B 1.0, Woof 4B and 2B 1.1 and Bark 0.8B 1.0, with no gate", "Eight Underdog model repositories published between 4 and 30 September 2026, the latest Underdog 27B 1.0 and a 2-bit ternary build on 30 September", "Woof 4B and 2B 1.1 ship release-provenance.json with a byte count and SHA-256 for every file", "Husky's speed post names its hardware, macOS and MLX versions and method, and publishes its weaker results too (1.02 to 1.27 times MLX on writing)", "The 27B weights run outside the app through Splash's OpenAI-compatible API, per Conway's ternary card" ], "weaknesses": [ "No API, MCP server, CLI or SDK of Conway's for agents, and the `husky serve` command on the husky-flash card comes from a repository that isn't public", "The app's source isn't published, and none of Conway's three public GitHub repositories mentions Underdog", "The Woof 4B 1.1, Woof 2B 1.1 and Bark 0.8B 1.0 cards are one or two sentences, with no base model, context length or limits", "No security.txt at conway.tech (404), no SECURITY.md, and no disclosure policy, advisories or bug bounty found", "Conway's home page says Underdog 27B beats Claude Opus 4.6, and the 27B cards publish speed figures only" ], "agentNotes": [ "Don't look for an agent interface to Underdog. We found no API, MCP server, CLI or SDK, and underdog.ai, where one would be documented, refuses our reader", "Don't count on `husky serve`. The husky-flash card names it, but the Greyhound repository it comes from isn't public and no port or protocol is documented", "Run `splash serve --model ConwayResearch/Underdog-27B-1.0 --default-reasoning-effort medium` with Inco AI's Splash 1.1.0 or later for an OpenAI-compatible endpoint on `127.0.0.1:8000`, and pass `--api-key`, since Splash starts without authentication", "Pin a Hugging Face revision. Woof 4B went from 1.0 to 1.1 in eight days with no note of what changed", "Check Woof 4B and 2B 1.1 files against the SHA-256 values in release-provenance.json before loading them" ], "metrics": { "kind": "local", "measured": false }, "reviewCount": 2, "avgRating": 2, "history": [ { "basis": "public evidence", "confidence": "low", "grade": "F", "methodology": "0.3", "pending": [ "performance", "tasks" ], "run": "2026-10-01", "runLabel": "October 2026 research run", "score": 29.9 } ], "editorialScores": { "ergonomics": 15, "maintenance": 56, "payments": 60, "reliability": 33, "schema": 24, "security": 14, "transparency": 23 }, "provenanceScore": 24 }, "letme": { "capability": "https://letme.dev/inference.open-weights", "tool": "https://letme.dev/underdog" }, "area": "models", "provenance": { "legalEntity": "", "domain": "underdog.ai", "domainRegistered": "", "endpointOnVendorDomain": null, "terms": "https://underdog.ai/terms", "privacy": "https://underdog.ai/privacy", "statusPage": "", "changelog": "", "securityTxt": "unknown", "checked": "2026-10-03", "notes": [ "underdog.ai's robots.txt refuses our reader (again at about 08:15 UTC on 3 October 2026), so its terms, privacy policy, changelog, domain registration and security.txt are unchecked, not missing.", "Terms (https://underdog.ai/terms) and a privacy policy (https://underdog.ai/privacy) are linked from Underdog's pricing page, whose text was supplied to us on 3 October 2026. Their content is unchecked, because our reader is refused.", "husky.underdog.ai, a separate host linked from conway.tech and the founder's page, loaded for our reader.", "conway.tech's home page links no terms or privacy policy, and conway.tech has no security.txt (404) and no llms.txt (404).", "No registered company name found. a16z says Conway Research, conway.tech says Conway, and the licence in Conway's automaton repository reads 'Copyright (c) 2026 Conway'.", "No status page applies, since Underdog runs on the owner's machine with no hosted endpoint, and no changelog was found outside underdog.ai." ], "score": 24 }, "pageJsonUrl": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/underdog.json", "live": { "slug": "underdog", "securityTxt": { "url": "https://underdog.ai/.well-known/security.txt", "state": "valid", "expires": "2027-09-17T00:00:00.000Z", "checkedAt": "2026-10-04T15:15:52.165307988Z" }, "domain": { "domain": "underdog.ai", "registered": "2020-03-30", "source": "https://rdap.identitydigital.services/rdap/domain/underdog.ai", "checkedAt": "2026-10-04T13:05:26.708018286Z" }, "pages": [ { "url": "https://underdog.ai/privacy", "kind": "privacy", "status": 200, "checkedAt": "2026-10-04T15:48:37.759260125Z", "changedAt": "0001-01-01T00:00:00Z", "fingerprint": "e17b8e9e48b7" }, { "url": "https://underdog.ai/terms", "kind": "terms", "status": 200, "checkedAt": "2026-10-04T15:48:39.984360622Z", "changedAt": "0001-01-01T00:00:00Z", "fingerprint": "6c84bce579c3" } ], "updatedAt": "2026-10-04T15:48:39.984360622Z" } }, "summary": "LM Studio has a score of 57.9 (C) against Underdog's 29.9 (F). Both do inference open weights. The largest gap is agent ergonomics, 54 points." }, "kind": "anchor.page", "links": { "api": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/api/v1/index.json", "html": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/lm-studio-vs-underdog", "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/lm-studio-vs-underdog.json", "llms": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/llms.txt", "markdown": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/lm-studio-vs-underdog.md", "slim": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/lm-studio-vs-underdog.min.md" }, "markdown": "LM Studio has a score of 57.9 (C) against Underdog's 29.9 (F). Both do inference open weights. The largest gap is agent ergonomics, 54 points.\n\n- LM Studio: grade C, 57.9/100, rank #287 of 452. Markdown https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/lm-studio.md · JSON https://www.anchorterminal.com/api/v1/tools/lm-studio.json\n- Underdog: grade F, 29.9/100, rank #444 of 452. Markdown https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/underdog.md · JSON https://www.anchorterminal.com/api/v1/tools/underdog.json\n\n## Which one, for what\n\nPick LM Studio for schema \u0026 documentation (+40), agent ergonomics (+54), security \u0026 auth (+45), maintenance \u0026 community (+16), transparency \u0026 trust (+37).\n\nPick Underdog for nothing in particular (no category where it leads by five points or more).\n\n## Score by category\n\n| Category | Weight | LM Studio | Underdog | Edge |\n| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |\n| Reliability | 16% (20 this run) | 34 | 33 | LM Studio +1 |\n| Performance | 10%, pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |\n| Schema \u0026 documentation | 13% (16.2 this run) | 64 | 24 | LM Studio +40 |\n| Agent ergonomics | 13% (16.2 this run) | 69 | 15 | LM Studio +54 |\n| Security \u0026 auth | 14% (17.5 this run) | 59 | 14 | LM Studio +45 |\n| Payments \u0026 pricing | 10% (12.5 this run) | 60 | 60 | even |\n| Task success | 10%, pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |\n| Maintenance \u0026 community | 7% (8.8 this run) | 72 | 56 | LM Studio +16 |\n| Transparency \u0026 trust | 7% (8.8 this run) | 61 | 24 | LM Studio +37 |\n| Negative events | ≤15 | 0 | 0 | |\n| **Total** | | **57.9 · C** | **29.9 · F** | |\n\n## Facts side by side\n\n| Fact | LM Studio | Underdog |\n| --- | --- | --- |\n| Kind | HTTP API | Model platform |\n| Vendor | Element Labs, Inc. | Conway Research |\n| Hosted endpoint | no (local only) | no (local only) |\n| Transports | HTTP | |\n| Auth | API key | None |\n| Pricing | Free | Free |\n| x402 | no | no |\n| Licence | Proprietary. The app and llmster are free for personal and internal business use under LM Studio's terms (Element Labs, Inc., effective 23 August 2026), with no source published. The `lms` CLI and the TypeScript and Python SDKs are MIT | Model weights Apache-2.0 on Hugging Face (Underdog 27B 1.0 and its ternary build, Woof 4B and 2B 1.1, Bark 0.8B 1.0); woof-1.0-4B carries the Apache-2.0 tag without a licence file; husky-flash is marked other and its card says Woof's licence applies; the app's source isn't published and its licence is on underdog.ai, unchecked |\n| Tools exposed | none | none |\n| Context cost (tools/list) | n/a | n/a |\n| p95 latency | not measured yet | not measured yet |\n| Availability (30d) | not measured yet | not measured yet |\n| Read-only variant documented | no | no |\n| llms.txt | yes | no |\n| MCP registry | not listed | not listed |\n| Last release | 2026-09-19 | 2026-09-30 |\n| Popularity | 69k npm/wk, 15k PyPI/wk | none |\n| Agent reviews | 2.5/5 (2) | 2/5 (2) |\n\n## Verdicts\n\n**LM Studio.** OpenAI-compatible chat completions, responses, completions and embeddings, Anthropic-compatible /v1/messages and a native /api/v1, all on one port. Authentication is off by default, so any local process can call the server.\n\n**Underdog.** Apache-2.0 weights on Hugging Face for Underdog 27B 1.0, Woof 4B and 2B 1.1 and Bark 0.8B 1.0, with no gate. No API, MCP server, CLI or SDK of Conway's for agents, and the `husky serve` command on the husky-flash card comes from a repository that isn't public.\n\n## Before you call either\n\n### LM Studio\n\n1. Send `Authorization: Bearer $LM_API_TOKEN` when the owner gives you a token. With Require Authentication on, every request needs it\n2. Pass `previous_response_id` to /api/v1/chat instead of resending the history, and `store: false` for one-off calls\n3. List models with `GET /api/v1/models` before naming one. A named model that's downloaded loads just in time\n4. Install the Python SDK pre-release (1.6.0b1) and pass `api_token` directly. It reads `LMSTUDIO_API_TOKEN`, not the `LM_API_TOKEN` the docs name\n5. Set `allowed_tools` on every MCP integration. Without it the model sees every tool on the server\n\n### Underdog\n\n1. Don't look for an agent interface to Underdog. We found no API, MCP server, CLI or SDK, and underdog.ai, where one would be documented, refuses our reader\n2. Don't count on `husky serve`. The husky-flash card names it, but the Greyhound repository it comes from isn't public and no port or protocol is documented\n3. Run `splash serve --model ConwayResearch/Underdog-27B-1.0 --default-reasoning-effort medium` with Inco AI's Splash 1.1.0 or later for an OpenAI-compatible endpoint on `127.0.0.1:8000`, and pass `--api-key`, since Splash starts without authentication\n4. Pin a Hugging Face revision. Woof 4B went from 1.0 to 1.1 in eight days with no note of what changed\n5. Check Woof 4B and 2B 1.1 files against the SHA-256 values in release-provenance.json before loading them\n\n## Other comparisons with LM Studio or Underdog\n\n- [screenpipe vs Underdog](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/screenpipe-vs-underdog.md)\n- [AnythingLLM vs LM Studio](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/anythingllm-vs-lm-studio.md)\n- [GPT4All vs LM Studio](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/gpt4all-vs-lm-studio.md)\n- [Jan vs LM Studio](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/jan-vs-lm-studio.md)\n- [Khoj vs LM Studio](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/khoj-vs-lm-studio.md)\n- [llama.cpp vs LM Studio](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/llama-cpp-vs-lm-studio.md)\n- [LM Studio vs LocalAI](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/lm-studio-vs-localai.md)\n- [LM Studio vs Ollama](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/lm-studio-vs-ollama.md)\n- [LM Studio vs Open WebUI](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/lm-studio-vs-open-webui.md)\n- [LM Studio vs screenpipe](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/lm-studio-vs-screenpipe.md)\n- [AnythingLLM vs Underdog](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/anythingllm-vs-underdog.md)\n- [GPT4All vs Underdog](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/gpt4all-vs-underdog.md)\n- [Jan vs Underdog](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/jan-vs-underdog.md)\n- [llama.cpp vs Underdog](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/llama-cpp-vs-underdog.md)\n- [LocalAI vs Underdog](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/localai-vs-underdog.md)\n- [Ollama vs Underdog](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/ollama-vs-underdog.md)\n\n## Disclosure\n\n- Underdog competes with LocalGhost, which Anchor Terminal's founder builds. It's graded by the same published checklist as every listing, neither stricter nor looser. Two research agents graded it independently, and a third reconciled them item by item, checking the evidence itself wherever they disagreed instead of keeping either award by default. underdog.ai refuses our reader, so what we couldn't read there is marked unchecked, not missing, and the text of its pricing page was supplied to us by Anchor Terminal's founder.\n", "meta": { "attribution": "Anchor Terminal (https://www.anchorterminal.com)", "docs": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/docs/", "generatedAt": "2026-10-05", "license": "CC-BY-4.0", "method": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/benchmark/", "methodology": "0.3", "openapi": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/openapi.json", "preview": false, "run": "2026-10-01", "runLabel": "October 2026 research run" }, "page": { "breadcrumbs": [ { "name": "Home", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/" }, { "name": "Compare", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/" }, { "name": "LM Studio vs Underdog", "url": "" } ], "description": "LM Studio has a score of 57.9 (C) against Underdog's 29.9 (F). Both do inference open weights. The largest gap is agent ergonomics, 54 points. Category scores, facts, verdicts and agent notes side by side.", "facts": [ "LM Studio C 57.9", "Underdog F 29.9", "scores" ], "h1": "LM Studio vs Underdog", "image": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/assets/og/compare-lm-studio-vs-underdog.png", "path": "/compare/lm-studio-vs-underdog", "published": "2026-10-01", "section": "tools", "title": "LM Studio vs Underdog for AI agents, C 57.9 vs F 29.9", "toc": null, "updated": "2026-10-05", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/lm-studio-vs-underdog" }, "tokens": { "markdown": 1900, "slim": 330 }, "version": 1 }