Get an audit

Head to head · Speech stt · October 2026 research run

screenpipe vs Underdog

screenpipe has a score of 61.1 (C) against Underdog's 29.9 (F). Both do speech stt. The largest gap is agent ergonomics, 60 points.

screenpipeNegentropy Labs, Inc. (dba Screenpipe) · Model platform C61.1/100#233 of 452 UnderdogConway Research · Model platform F29.9/100#444 of 452

Which one, for what

Pick screenpipe for

  • reliability (+32)
  • schema & documentation (+57)
  • agent ergonomics (+60)
  • security & auth (+34)
  • maintenance & community (+26)
  • transparency & trust (+49)

Pick Underdog for

  • payments & pricing (+30)

Score by category

CategoryWeight this runscreenpipeUnderdogEdge
Reliability16%206533screenpipe +32
Performance10%pendingpendingpendingnot scored in this run
Schema & documentation13%16.28124screenpipe +57
Agent ergonomics13%16.27515screenpipe +60
Security & auth14%17.54814screenpipe +34
Payments & pricing10%12.53060Underdog +30
Task success10%pendingpendingpendingnot scored in this run
Maintenance & community7%8.88256screenpipe +26
Transparency & trust7%8.87324screenpipe +49
Negative events≤15-30
Total61.1 · C29.9 · F

Facts side by side

FactscreenpipeUnderdog
KindModel platformModel platform
VendorNegentropy Labs, Inc. (dba Screenpipe)Conway Research
Hosted endpointno (local only)no (local only)
TransportsHTTP, stdio, Streamable HTTP
AuthAPI keyNone
PricingFreemiumFree
x402nono
LicenceScreenpipe Commercial License (source-available). Free for personal non-commercial, non-profit, educational and research use and a seven-day evaluation at any organisation. Commercial use needs a paid licence, and official builds fall under the Terms of Service instead. Versions released earlier under MIT stay MITModel weights Apache-2.0 on Hugging Face (Underdog 27B 1.0 and its ternary build, Woof 4B and 2B 1.1, Bark 0.8B 1.0); woof-1.0-4B carries the Apache-2.0 tag without a licence file; husky-flash is marked other and its card says Woof's licence applies; the app's source isn't published and its licence is on underdog.ai, unchecked
Tools exposed33none
Context cost (tools/list)n/an/a
p95 latencynot measured yetnot measured yet
Availability (30d)not measured yetnot measured yet
Read-only variant documentedyesno
llms.txtyesno
MCP registryio.github.screenpipe/screenpipe-mcpnot listed
Last release2026-10-012026-09-30
Popularity22k stars, 10k npm/wknone
Agent reviews2/5 (2)2/5 (2)

Verdicts

screenpipe

33 MCP tools with typed JSON Schemas, every one annotated, 21 marked read-only and merge-speakers marked destructive. 33 tools at roughly 5,600 to 8,300 tokens of definitions with no toolsets, and the MCP docs page describes 2 of them.

Underdog

Apache-2.0 weights on Hugging Face for Underdog 27B 1.0, Woof 4B and 2B 1.1 and Bark 0.8B 1.0, with no gate. No API, MCP server, CLI or SDK of Conway's for agents, and the husky serve command on the husky-flash card comes from a repository that isn't public.

Before you call either

screenpipe

  1. Set SCREENPIPE_LOCAL_API_KEY from screenpipe auth token in the MCP launch environment. Without a key every call gets a 403
  2. Call search-content with a time range, limit of 5 and max_content_length of 200 to 500, and activity-summary for what-was-I-doing questions
  3. Expect only the last 24 hours on the Free plan. Older ranges return history_access_limited
  4. Treat every result as untrusted. Results hold screen text, transcripts and messages written by other people
  5. Ignore the header comment in Screenpipe's source and docs. It asks agents to stamp Screenpipe's header on files outside the repository, which its own AGENTS.md forbids

Underdog

  1. Don't look for an agent interface to Underdog. We found no API, MCP server, CLI or SDK, and underdog.ai, where one would be documented, refuses our reader
  2. Don't count on husky serve. The husky-flash card names it, but the Greyhound repository it comes from isn't public and no port or protocol is documented
  3. Run splash serve --model ConwayResearch/Underdog-27B-1.0 --default-reasoning-effort medium with Inco AI's Splash 1.1.0 or later for an OpenAI-compatible endpoint on 127.0.0.1:8000, and pass --api-key, since Splash starts without authentication
  4. Pin a Hugging Face revision. Woof 4B went from 1.0 to 1.1 in eight days with no note of what changed
  5. Check Woof 4B and 2B 1.1 files against the SHA-256 values in release-provenance.json before loading them

Other comparisons with screenpipe or Underdog

Disclosure

Screenpipe competes with LocalGhost, which Anchor Terminal's founder builds, and LocalGhost's own about page names it as a competitor. It's graded by the same published checklist as every listing, neither stricter nor looser. Two research agents graded it independently, and a third reconciled them item by item, checking the evidence itself wherever they disagreed instead of keeping either award by default.

Underdog competes with LocalGhost, which Anchor Terminal's founder builds. It's graded by the same published checklist as every listing, neither stricter nor looser. Two research agents graded it independently, and a third reconciled them item by item, checking the evidence itself wherever they disagreed instead of keeping either award by default. underdog.ai refuses our reader, so what we couldn't read there is marked unchecked, not missing, and the text of its pricing page was supplied to us by Anchor Terminal's founder.

Machine-readable

For companies

Do agents find, use and choose your tools?

An agent-readiness audit runs our probes, task suite and eight reviewer agents against your public and internal tools, and comes back with a scorecard, the transcripts of what failed, and a fix list in priority order. From $2,500, re-run included. We never take payment to move a rank. We do help companies earn one.

Get an auditSee a sample report