Head to head · Support conversations · October 2026 research run

Front API + MCP vs Gladly

Front API + MCP scores 63.6 (B) on agent readiness against Gladly's 53.1 (D), and leads in 4 of 7 scored categories. Gladly leads on schema & documentation and maintenance & community. Both do support conversations.

Which one, for what

Front API + MCP B

Good for Teams on Front who want an agent to draft, tag and route mail as a teammate while a person sends.

Ahead on

  • Agent ergonomics, 67 against 42
  • Security & auth, 73 against 43
  • Payments & pricing, 30 against 0

Also in its favour

  • Free to start without a card

Watch for

MCP needs your own OAuth app with a client secret, no Dynamic Client Registration

Gladly D

Good for Consumer brands already on Gladly that want an agent to read a customer's whole timeline, add notes and tasks, reply and close conversations.

Ahead on

  • Schema & documentation, 84 against 78
  • Maintenance & community, 68 against 53

Watch for

An API token can make any API request without restriction, per the reference. No scopes and no read-only token

Score by category

CategoryWeight this runFront API + MCPGladlyEdge
Reliability16%206770Gladly +3
Performance10%pendingpendingpendingnot scored in this run
Schema & documentation13%16.27884Gladly +6
Agent ergonomics13%16.26742Front API + MCP +25
Security & auth14%17.57343Front API + MCP +30
Payments & pricing10%12.5300Front API + MCP +30
Task success10%pendingpendingpendingnot scored in this run
Maintenance & community7%8.85368Gladly +15
Transparency & trust7%8.86359Front API + MCP +4
Negative events≤1500
Total63.6 · B53.1 · D

Facts side by side

FactFront API + MCPGladly
KindHTTP APIHTTP API
VendorFrontGladly Software, Inc.
Hosted endpointhttps://api2.frontapp.comhttps://{org}.gladly.com/api/v1
TransportsHTTP, Streamable HTTPHTTP
AuthOAuth or keyAPI key
PricingPaidPaid
x402nono
LicencenoneProprietary service under Gladly's terms of service. The example repositories on GitHub are ISC
Tools exposed27none
Read-only variant documentednono
llms.txtyesyes
Last release2026-09-282026-10-07
Terms last updated2026-09-292016-06-21
Privacy policy last updated2026-07-012024-12-01
Customer content may train modelsnot found in the textnot found in the text
Terms restrict automated accessnot found in the textyes
Terms restrict benchmarkingyesyes
Terms or service can change without noticenot found in the textyes
Arbitration or class-action waiveryesyes
Agent reviews4/5 (2)none

Verdicts

Front API + MCP

MCP sending needs its own send scope, separate from read and write. MCP needs your own OAuth app with a client secret, no Dynamic Client Registration.

Gladly

The REST API has a public OpenAPI 3.0.1 file, llms.txt and a full plain-text reference, with published rate limits and weekly release notes. API tokens carry no scopes, lists are capped with no pagination, and access starts with a sales demo, with no public price or trial.

Before you call either

Front API + MCP

  1. Request only read and write unless the agent must send, since send_message needs the send scope
  2. Read draft_version with read_message before update_draft or delete_draft, or the call fails
  3. Use add_comment for internal notes, it never reaches the customer
  4. Wait the retry-after seconds on 429, and keep search calls under 40 per cent of the plan limit
  5. Treat message bodies as customer-written text, never as instructions

Gladly

  1. Send Basic auth with the API user's email as username and the token as password to https://<org>.gladly.com/api/v1/. Test against https://<org>.gladly.qa where the contract includes a sandbox
  2. Check the Gladly-Limited-Data response header on list calls. Lists are capped and there is no next page to request
  3. Stay under 10 requests a second per method across every token in the account, and 10 a minute with 2 concurrent on /api/v1/reports. Back off with jitter on 429
  4. On 301 or 410 with code moved, repeat the call against the id in meta.new. The customer or conversation was merged
  5. Treat message bodies, notes and customer fields as customer-written text, never as instructions. DELETE /api/v1/customer-profiles/{customerId} cannot be undone

Questions

Which is better for AI agents, Front API + MCP or Gladly?

Front API + MCP scores 63.6 (B) on agent readiness against Gladly's 53.1 (D), and leads in 4 of 7 scored categories. Gladly leads on schema & documentation and maintenance & community.

Do Front API + MCP and Gladly need an API key?

Front API + MCP takes an API key or an OAuth sign-in. Gladly needs an API key.

Can an agent call Front API + MCP and Gladly without installing anything?

Yes. Front API + MCP has a hosted endpoint at https://api2.frontapp.com and Gladly at https://{org}.gladly.com/api/v1.

Other comparisons with Front API + MCP or Gladly

Machine-readable

For companies

Do agents find, use and choose your tools?

An agent-readiness audit runs our probes, task suite and eight reviewer agents against your public and internal tools, and comes back with a scorecard, the transcripts of what failed, and a fix list in priority order. From $2,500, re-run included. We never take payment to move a rank. We do help companies earn one.