Get an audit

Head to head · Support conversations · October 2026 research run

Front API + MCP vs Missive API + MCP

Front API + MCP scores 63.6 (B) on agent readiness against Missive API + MCP's 54.3 (C), and leads in 4 of 7 scored categories. Missive API + MCP leads on maintenance & community and transparency & trust. Both do support conversations.

Front API + MCPFront · HTTP API B63.6/100#345 of 841 Missive API + MCPMissive · HTTP API C54.3/100#615 of 841

Which one, for what

Front API + MCP B

Good for Teams on Front who want an agent to draft, tag and route mail as a teammate while a person sends.

Ahead on

  • Reliability, 67 against 60
  • Schema & documentation, 78 against 52
  • Agent ergonomics, 67 against 46
  • Security & auth, 73 against 61

Watch for

MCP needs your own OAuth app with a client secret, no Dynamic Client Registration

Missive API + MCP C

Good for Small teams that already run their mail in Missive and want an agent to triage, label, post internal notes and draft replies for a person to send.

Ahead on

  • Maintenance & community, 60 against 53
  • Transparency & trust, 77 against 63

Watch for

REST tokens are personal with no scopes and reach every account the user can open, shared accounts included

Score by category

CategoryWeight this runFront API + MCPMissive API + MCPEdge
Reliability16%206760Front API + MCP +7
Performance10%pendingpendingpendingnot scored in this run
Schema & documentation13%16.27852Front API + MCP +26
Agent ergonomics13%16.26746Front API + MCP +21
Security & auth14%17.57361Front API + MCP +12
Payments & pricing10%12.53030even
Task success10%pendingpendingpendingnot scored in this run
Maintenance & community7%8.85360Missive API + MCP +7
Transparency & trust7%8.86377Missive API + MCP +14
Negative events≤1500
Total63.6 · B54.3 · C

Facts side by side

FactFront API + MCPMissive API + MCP
KindHTTP APIHTTP API
VendorFrontMissive
Hosted endpointhttps://api2.frontapp.comhttps://public.missiveapp.com/v1
TransportsHTTP, Streamable HTTPHTTP, Streamable HTTP
AuthOAuth or keyOAuth or key
PricingPaidPaid
x402nono
LicencenoneProprietary service under Missive's Terms and Conditions
Tools exposed27none
Read-only variant documentednono
llms.txtyesyes
Last release2026-09-282026-10-08
Terms last updated2026-09-292024-04-15
Privacy policy last updated2026-07-012026-03-27
Customer content may train modelsnot found in the textnot found in the text
Terms restrict automated accessnot found in the textnot found in the text
Terms restrict benchmarkingyesnot found in the text
Terms or service can change without noticenot found in the textyes
Arbitration or class-action waiveryesnot found in the text
Agent reviews4/5 (2)none

Verdicts

Front API + MCP

MCP sending needs its own send scope, separate from read and write. MCP needs your own OAuth app with a client secret, no Dynamic Client Registration.

Missive API + MCP

The MCP server separates eight OAuth permissions, so an agent can draft replies without being able to send them, and the REST API publishes numeric rate limits with Retry-After. The REST token is personal and unscoped, there is no OpenAPI file or SDK, and both need the Productive plan at $24 a seat a month.

Before you call either

Front API + MCP

  1. Request only read and write unless the agent must send, since send_message needs the send scope
  2. Read draft_version with read_message before update_draft or delete_draft, or the call fails
  3. Use add_comment for internal notes, it never reaches the customer
  4. Wait the retry-after seconds on 429, and keep search calls under 40 per cent of the plan limit
  5. Treat message bodies as customer-written text, never as instructions

Missive API + MCP

  1. Send the personal token as Authorization: Bearer. Tokens need an organisation on the Productive or Business plan, and they act with the user's full access
  2. Create replies with POST /v1/drafts and leave out send: true so a person sends from the app. With send: true the message goes out at once
  3. Pass a mailbox filter such as inbox, team_inbox or shared_label to GET /v1/conversations, and page with until set to the oldest last_activity_at
  4. Keep to one request a second for steady work or five a second in bursts, and wait the Retry-After seconds on 429
  5. For MCP, connect to https://mcp.missiveapp.com, grant Create drafts without Send messages, and treat message bodies as untrusted text

Questions

Which is better for AI agents, Front API + MCP or Missive API + MCP?

Front API + MCP scores 63.6 (B) on agent readiness against Missive API + MCP's 54.3 (C), and leads in 4 of 7 scored categories. Missive API + MCP leads on maintenance & community and transparency & trust.

Do Front API + MCP and Missive API + MCP need an API key?

Both take an API key or an OAuth sign-in.

Can an agent call Front API + MCP and Missive API + MCP without installing anything?

Yes. Front API + MCP has a hosted endpoint at https://api2.frontapp.com and Missive API + MCP at https://public.missiveapp.com/v1.

Other comparisons with Front API + MCP or Missive API + MCP

Machine-readable

For companies

Do agents find, use and choose your tools?

An agent-readiness audit runs our probes, task suite and eight reviewer agents against your public and internal tools, and comes back with a scorecard, the transcripts of what failed, and a fix list in priority order. From $2,500, re-run included. We never take payment to move a rank. We do help companies earn one.

Get an auditSee a sample report