Head to head · Market history · October 2026 research run
EODHD vs Finnhub
EODHD scores 59 (C) on agent readiness against Finnhub's 45.1 (E), and leads in 6 of 7 scored categories. Both do market history.
Best financial market data APIs for AI agents · All 55 markets comparisons
Which one, for what
EODHD C
Best for Agents that need long end-of-day history, dividends and splits and fundamentals across 60 exchanges at a low monthly price, with weighted calls to budget.
Ahead on
- Reliability, 65 against 48
- Schema & documentation, 70 against 58
- Agent ergonomics, 76 against 56
- Security & auth, 39 against 32
- Maintenance & community, 82 against 60
- Transparency & trust, 52 against 27
Also in its favour
- Runs on your own machine
Watch for
Every docs page shows the token as api_token= in the query string, and the MCP v1 address carries it in the URL
Finnhub E
Best for Agents that need one key across quotes, fundamentals, estimates, filings and transcripts with official libraries, and a free key for prototypes.
No category where it leads by five points or more, and no fact that sets it apart.
Watch for
The Swagger document declares the key only as a token query parameter, and the examples carry it in the URL
Why the edge
Each category where one leads by five points or more, with the reason behind each side's score from its assessment. The numbers are in the table below; this is what they stand for.
Transparency & trust EODHD +25
EODHD 52
A closed, proprietary API under terms that name the entity and the personal and professional user classes but carry no date and no governing law; the MCP server and OpenAPI document are MIT (15 of 30). The privacy policy is undated, keeps data while the account is active with no periods, names Google only, and no DPA was found; the MCP server's telemetry is disclosed in its README (8 of 30). No deprecation policy; Exchange Details v1 was kept when v2 shipped, and new APIs are dated on the blog (5 of 20). No subprocessor list or data locations beyond Google as an advertising platform (2 of 20). 15 + 8 + 5 + 2 = 30.
Finnhub 27
A closed service whose terms exist at a page that robots.txt disallows, so they were not read; the pricing page says every self-serve plan is personal use, and no legal entity or governing law was found (8 of 30). No privacy policy was found, /privacy redirecting to the home page (0 of 30). No deprecation policy or dated notices found (0 of 20). Stripe and Braintree scripts load on the site, but no processor list or data location is disclosed (0 of 20). 8 + 0 + 0 + 0 = 8.
Maintenance & community EODHD +22
EODHD 82
Read as a closed service with open-source tooling. The MCP server's last commit is 15 October 2026 and the Claude skills repository was updated 22 October (30). Dated changes in the last 90 days include MCP commits on 8, 9 and 17 September and 9, 10 and 15 October, and the real-time feed update of 26 August 2026 (20). Pull requests on the MCP repository are merged by the vendor, support is 24/7 by email and chat per the site, and forum.eodhd.com did not resolve for us (12 of 15). Official Python and Node.js libraries; the Python package's last PyPI release is 1.0.32 of 18 December 2024, though its repository was updated in October 2026 (12 of 15). The MCP server pins fastmcp, ships tests and a security toolchain in CI (8 of 10). 30 + 20 + 12 + 12 + 8 = 82.
Finnhub 60
Read as a closed service. The newest dated change is 2 November 2026, when finnhub-go, finnhub-ruby and finnhub-php gained a price target history endpoint; the MCP page is dated 6 August 2026 (30). Only that one dated change falls in the last 90 days, the previous library commits being 22 June 2026 (5 of 20). Support by email, with no public changelog or community channel found (5 of 15). Six official client libraries, finnhub-python at 2.4.29 of 24 June 2026 (15). The libraries are generated from the API document; no CI run was visible and the Python README names an older version than PyPI (5 of 10). 30 + 5 + 5 + 15 + 5 = 60.
Agent ergonomics EODHD +20
EODHD 76
The REST API is the surface graded. from, to, period, fmt, filter on fundamentals and limit on news size responses, and the hosted MCP server lists 72 or 88 tools (15 of 25). limit and offset on news and the screener, date ranges on series, bulk per exchange (15 of 20). Error codes an agent can branch on, 402 and 403 with meanings, and the MCP server answers 403 with what the plan covers (15 of 20). Every REST call is a read; 85 of 88 MCP tools carry readOnlyHint true and the three Praams report tools are marked otherwise (16 of 20). Few required parameters and official Python and Node.js libraries, with R, C# and PHP clients (15). 15 + 15 + 15 + 16 + 15 = 76.
Finnhub 56
The REST API is the surface graded. from and to on candles and news, and symbol-scoped calls, size responses; no field selection, and the MCP server lists 70 tools (12 of 25). Date filters but no pagination on most lists (10 of 20). Only the 429 is documented; a missing key answered 401 with a JSON error field in our one test call (5 of 20). All but one operation are GET reads; the MCP annotations were not read (14 of 20). Few required parameters and official libraries in six languages (15). 12 + 10 + 5 + 14 + 15 = 56.
Reliability EODHD +17
EODHD 65
Read with the hosted lines. A public status page exists at uptime.eodhistoricaldata.com, an UptimeRobot page announced on the blog on 27 March 2020 (20), but its figures load by script and our reader got an error, so no incident history could be read (5). Limits are published with numbers, 20 calls a day free, 100,000 a day on paid plans, 1,000 requests a minute, with call weights per endpoint (15). 429 carries Retry-After, X-RateLimit headers report the ceiling, and 402 marks an exhausted allowance; reads only (15). The terms promise commercially reasonable efforts and no SLA, with SLAs sold by sales (0). The core API is generally available, with several newer APIs marked beta (10). 20 + 5 + 15 + 15 + 0 + 10 = 65.
Finnhub 48
Read with the hosted lines. No status page was found on the site, in the docs document or on the MCP page (0), so no incident history could be read (5). Limits are published with numbers, 60 calls a minute on the free key, 150 to 900 a minute by plan, and 30 calls a second on top of every plan (15). The docs say the limit answers 429 and the MCP page says to wait a minute, with no Retry-After or backoff guidance (8 of 15). The home page says 99.99 per cent uptime with an SLA available for enterprise clients (10). The API is generally available (10). 0 + 5 + 15 + 8 + 10 + 10 = 48.
Schema & documentation EODHD +12
EODHD 70
An OpenAPI 3.1 document in a public repository covers 74 endpoints, last updated 18 February 2026, and the MCP server's 88 tools carry typed inputs and annotations in the source (22 of 25). llms.txt of 32 KB and an llms-full.txt, plus documentation resources inside the MCP server (10). Each API page states its purpose and plan, and tool titles name the dataset, with little on when not to use one (14 of 20). Parameters are documented with formats and the symbol convention is spelled out, but allowed values sit in prose (8 of 15). Examples on every API page and the demo token, with 401, 402, 403, 404, 422 and 429 documented in llms.txt and the limits article (11 of 15). Exchange Details v2 shipped in May 2026 with v1 kept, MCP has v1 and v2, and new APIs are announced on a dated blog, but there is no changelog page (5 of 15). 22 + 10 + 14 + 8 + 11 + 5 = 70.
Finnhub 58
A public Swagger 2.0 document covers 116 paths with a description on every operation, declaring the key as a query parameter and a 200 response only; the MCP tools were not read (20 of 25). /llms.txt returns the site's HTML shell and no Markdown docs exist (0 of 10). Each operation states its purpose, a premium marker and, on quote, advice against polling, with little on when not to use it (14 of 20). Required flags and types are set on 248 parameters, but allowed values such as news categories sit in description text and no enum is declared (8 of 15). Every operation has example URLs and sample code in five languages, while the only documented error is the 429 (9 of 15). The path carries v1 and no changelog or dated change notes were found (7 of 15). 20 + 0 + 14 + 8 + 9 + 7 = 58.
Security & auth EODHD +7
EODHD 39
One token per account with no scopes, shown as api_token= in the query string on every docs page, with a Bearer header allowed per llms.txt; the MCP v1 address embeds the token and v2 uses OAuth 2.1 with one scope, full-access (20 less 10 for the query string, so 10). All REST calls read; three MCP report tools trigger provider-side report generation and email (14 of 20). News and sentiment are third-party text and no guidance was found (5 of 15). A usage endpoint and dashboard show calls spent, not a per-call log (6 of 15). No security.txt, disclosure policy, bug bounty or certification found; the MCP server's CI runs Bandit, Semgrep and pip-audit (4 of 20). 10 + 14 + 5 + 6 + 4 = 39.
Finnhub 32
One key per account with no scopes, documented as token= in the query string or an X-Finnhub-Token header, and the Swagger document declares only the query form. The MCP server uses OAuth with fixed public client ids and keeps the key from the assistant (20 less 10 for the query string, plus 2 for the MCP route, so 12). Every data operation is a read (15 of 20). News, transcripts and filings are third-party text and no guidance was found (5 of 15). No usage log for the key holder was found (0 of 15). security.txt redirects to the home page and no disclosure policy, bug bounty or certification was found (0 of 20). 12 + 15 + 5 + 0 + 0 = 32.
Score by category
| Category | Weight this run | EODHD | Finnhub | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Reliability | 16%20 | 65 | 48 | EODHD +17 |
| Performance | 10%pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |
| Schema & documentation | 13%16.2 | 70 | 58 | EODHD +12 |
| Agent ergonomics | 13%16.2 | 76 | 56 | EODHD +20 |
| Security & auth | 14%17.5 | 39 | 32 | EODHD +7 |
| Payments & pricing | 10%12.5 | 30 | 30 | even |
| Task success | 10%pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |
| Maintenance & community | 7%8.8 | 82 | 60 | EODHD +22 |
| Transparency & trust | 7%8.8 | 52 | 27 | EODHD +25 |
| Negative events | ≤15 | 0 | 0 | |
| Total | C 59/100 | E 45.1/100 |
Facts side by side
| Fact | EODHD | Finnhub |
|---|---|---|
| Kind | HTTP API | HTTP API |
| Vendor | Unicorn Data Services | Finnhub |
| Hosted endpoint | https://eodhd.com/api | https://finnhub.io/api/v1 |
| Transports | HTTP, Streamable HTTP, SSE (legacy), stdio, websocket | HTTP, Streamable HTTP, websocket |
| Auth | OAuth or key | OAuth or key |
| Pricing | Freemium | Freemium |
| x402 | no | no |
| Tools exposed | 88 | 70 |
| Read-only variant documented | no | no |
| llms.txt | yes | no |
| Last release | 2026-10-15 | 2026-11-02 |
| Terms last updated | no date given | couldn't be read |
| Privacy policy last updated | no date given | no document linked |
| Customer content may train models | not found in the text | couldn't be read |
| Terms restrict automated access | not found in the text | couldn't be read |
| Terms restrict benchmarking | not found in the text | couldn't be read |
| Terms or service can change without notice | not found in the text | couldn't be read |
| Arbitration or class-action waiver | not found in the text | couldn't be read |
| Popularity | 24 stars | 1.1k stars |
Verdicts
EODHD
Limits, call weights, rate-limit headers, 429 with Retry-After and 402 on an exhausted allowance are documented, with an OpenAPI document and an open-source MCP server of 88 read-only tools. The token is documented in the query string, the MCP v1 address embeds it, the status page could not be read, and the terms carry no date, SLA or governing law.
Finnhub
A public Swagger document covers 116 endpoints, six official client libraries exist, and a free key gives 60 calls a minute with no card. The key is documented in the query string, no status page, changelog, error reference or privacy policy was found, and robots.txt kept the terms from our reader.
Before you call either
EODHD
- Send the token as
Authorization: Bearer, which llms.txt allows, rather thanapi_token=in the URL, and prefer the v2 OAuth MCP address over v1 - Budget calls, not requests; fundamentals cost 10, intraday and news 5, bulk 100 or more, and a 404 for a bad ticker is still charged, so resolve tickers with the search endpoint first
- Read
X-RateLimit-Remainingand honour Retry-After on 429; a 402 means the daily allowance is gone until midnight GMT and no retry will help - Use
{TICKER}.{EXCHANGE}symbols in upper case, such as AAPL.US or EURUSD.FOREX, andBTC-USD.CCfor crypto - Expect 20 calls a day and one year of history on the free plan; a 403 means the plan lacks the endpoint, not a bad key
Finnhub
- Send the key as the
X-Finnhub-Tokenheader, not astoken=in the URL, and keep under 30 calls a second on top of the plan's per-minute limit - Check the
premiummarker before calling; a free key reaches 29 operations and the rest answer with an error - Poll /quote sparingly; the docs say constant polling is not recommended and point to the websocket for real-time updates
- Expect 401
{"error":"Please use an API key."}without a key and 429 over the limit; wait a minute before retrying, as the MCP page advises - Self-serve plans are personal use; anything commercial needs the enterprise contact route
Questions
Which is better for AI agents, EODHD or Finnhub?
EODHD scores 59 (C) on agent readiness against Finnhub's 45.1 (E), and leads in 6 of 7 scored categories.
Do EODHD and Finnhub need an API key?
Both take an API key or an OAuth sign-in.
Can an agent call EODHD and Finnhub without installing anything?
Yes. EODHD has a hosted endpoint at https://eodhd.com/api and Finnhub at https://finnhub.io/api/v1.
Other comparisons with EODHD or Finnhub
- Alpha Vantage vs EODHD
- Alpha Vantage vs Finnhub
- Databento vs EODHD
- Databento vs Finnhub
- Finnhub vs Intrinio
- Finnhub vs Massive (formerly Polygon.io)
- Finnhub vs Tiingo
- Finnhub vs Twelve Data
- Financial Datasets vs Finnhub
- Financial Modeling Prep vs Finnhub
- EODHD vs Financial Datasets
- EODHD vs Financial Modeling Prep
- EODHD vs Intrinio
- EODHD vs Massive (formerly Polygon.io)
- EODHD vs Tiingo
- EODHD vs Twelve Data
- Benzinga vs EODHD
- Benzinga vs Finnhub
Machine-readable
- This page as Markdown
/compare/eodhd-vs-finnhub.md· slim.min.md· JSON.json(or sendAccept: text/markdown) - Each listing in full
/api/v1/tools/eodhd.json·/api/v1/tools/finnhub.json - From a terminal
anchor compare eodhd finnhub(the CLI) - Over MCP
compare_tools {"a": "eodhd", "b": "finnhub"}at/mcp, no key