Head to head · Market fundamentals · October 2026 research run
Financial Modeling Prep vs Finnhub
Financial Modeling Prep scores 48.7 (D) on agent readiness against Finnhub's 45.1 (E), and leads in 4 of 7 scored categories. Both do market fundamentals.
Best financial market data APIs for AI agents · All 55 markets comparisons
Which one, for what
Best for Agents doing company research on statements, ratios, DCF, filings, transcripts and calendars with one key, and US coverage on cheap plans.
Ahead on
- Transparency & trust, 57 against 27
Watch for
The documented MCP connection URL puts the API key in the query string, and the REST docs accept ?apikey= too
Finnhub E
Best for Agents that need one key across quotes, fundamentals, estimates, filings and transcripts with official libraries, and a free key for prototypes.
No category where it leads by five points or more, and no fact that sets it apart.
Watch for
The Swagger document declares the key only as a token query parameter, and the examples carry it in the URL
Why the edge
Each category where one leads by five points or more, with the reason behind each side's score from its assessment. The numbers are in the table below; this is what they stand for.
Transparency & trust Financial Modeling Prep +30
Financial Modeling Prep 57
A closed service under terms that are clear on personal and commercial use and on display licensing, last updated 1 August 2023, but that name no legal entity, address or governing law (12 of 30). The privacy policy is undated, keeps data for as long as necessary with no periods, says no third parties receive data while naming Google AdSense and Analytics, and no DPA was found (8 of 30). The docs keep a Legacy section and api-docs.md says /v3 and /v4 are discontinued, with no notice period stated; behaviour changes such as the Economics Indicators default window appear in the dated changelog (8 of 20). Google services are the only processors named and no data location is given (5 of 20). 12 + 8 + 8 + 5 = 33.
Finnhub 27
A closed service whose terms exist at a page that robots.txt disallows, so they were not read; the pricing page says every self-serve plan is personal use, and no legal entity or governing law was found (8 of 30). No privacy policy was found, /privacy redirecting to the home page (0 of 30). No deprecation policy or dated notices found (0 of 20). Stripe and Braintree scripts load on the site, but no processor list or data location is disclosed (0 of 20). 8 + 0 + 0 + 0 = 8.
Score by category
| Category | Weight this run | Financial Modeling Prep | Finnhub | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Reliability | 16%20 | 50 | 48 | Financial Modeling Prep +2 |
| Performance | 10%pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |
| Schema & documentation | 13%16.2 | 61 | 58 | Financial Modeling Prep +3 |
| Agent ergonomics | 13%16.2 | 59 | 56 | Financial Modeling Prep +3 |
| Security & auth | 14%17.5 | 30 | 32 | Finnhub +2 |
| Payments & pricing | 10%12.5 | 30 | 30 | even |
| Task success | 10%pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |
| Maintenance & community | 7%8.8 | 60 | 60 | even |
| Transparency & trust | 7%8.8 | 57 | 27 | Financial Modeling Prep +30 |
| Negative events | ≤15 | 0 | 0 | |
| Total | D 48.7/100 | E 45.1/100 |
Facts side by side
| Fact | Financial Modeling Prep | Finnhub |
|---|---|---|
| Kind | HTTP API | HTTP API |
| Vendor | Financial Modeling Prep | Finnhub |
| Hosted endpoint | https://financialmodelingprep.com/stable | https://finnhub.io/api/v1 |
| Transports | HTTP, Streamable HTTP | HTTP, Streamable HTTP, websocket |
| Auth | API key | OAuth or key |
| Pricing | Freemium | Freemium |
| Price for market fundamentals | not published | $50 per month (plan) |
| x402 | no | no |
| Tools exposed | none | 70 |
| Read-only variant documented | no | no |
| llms.txt | yes | no |
| Last release | 2026-11-02 | 2026-11-02 |
| Terms last updated | couldn't be read | couldn't be read |
| Privacy policy last updated | couldn't be read | no document linked |
| Customer content may train models | couldn't be read | couldn't be read |
| Terms restrict automated access | couldn't be read | couldn't be read |
| Terms restrict benchmarking | couldn't be read | couldn't be read |
| Terms or service can change without notice | couldn't be read | couldn't be read |
| Arbitration or class-action waiver | couldn't be read | couldn't be read |
| Popularity | none | 1.1k stars |
Verdicts
Financial Modeling Prep
About 199 stable REST endpoints with Markdown docs for agents, a dated changelog and a free key at 250 calls a day. The one key travels in the query string on the documented MCP address, error responses and 429 handling are undocumented, the status history could not be read, and personal plans forbid any company use.
Finnhub
A public Swagger document covers 116 endpoints, six official client libraries exist, and a free key gives 60 calls a minute with no card. The key is documented in the query string, no status page, changelog, error reference or privacy policy was found, and robots.txt kept the terms from our reader.
Before you call either
Financial Modeling Prep
- Send the key as an
apikeyheader, not in the URL, and treat the MCP?apikey=address as a secret - Use the /stable paths from api-docs.md; /api/v3 and /v4 are discontinued even though the FAQ still shows a v3 example
- On the free plan expect 5 results and page 0 on many list endpoints; read pricing.md before planning a crawl
- A missing or wrong key returns HTTP 401 with an
Error Messagefield; stop and ask the user rather than retry - Do not display or pass on the data in a product; personal plans forbid it
Finnhub
- Send the key as the
X-Finnhub-Tokenheader, not astoken=in the URL, and keep under 30 calls a second on top of the plan's per-minute limit - Check the
premiummarker before calling; a free key reaches 29 operations and the rest answer with an error - Poll /quote sparingly; the docs say constant polling is not recommended and point to the websocket for real-time updates
- Expect 401
{"error":"Please use an API key."}without a key and 429 over the limit; wait a minute before retrying, as the MCP page advises - Self-serve plans are personal use; anything commercial needs the enterprise contact route
Questions
Which is better for AI agents, Financial Modeling Prep or Finnhub?
Financial Modeling Prep scores 48.7 (D) on agent readiness against Finnhub's 45.1 (E), and leads in 4 of 7 scored categories.
Do Financial Modeling Prep and Finnhub need an API key?
Financial Modeling Prep needs an API key. Finnhub takes an API key or an OAuth sign-in.
Can an agent call Financial Modeling Prep and Finnhub without installing anything?
Yes. Financial Modeling Prep has a hosted endpoint at https://financialmodelingprep.com/stable and Finnhub at https://finnhub.io/api/v1.
Other comparisons with Financial Modeling Prep or Finnhub
- Alpha Vantage vs Financial Modeling Prep
- Alpha Vantage vs Finnhub
- Databento vs Financial Modeling Prep
- Databento vs Finnhub
- Financial Modeling Prep vs Massive (formerly Polygon.io)
- Finnhub vs Intrinio
- Finnhub vs Massive (formerly Polygon.io)
- Finnhub vs Tiingo
- Finnhub vs Twelve Data
- Financial Datasets vs Financial Modeling Prep
- Financial Datasets vs Finnhub
- Financial Modeling Prep vs Intrinio
- Financial Modeling Prep vs Tiingo
- Financial Modeling Prep vs Twelve Data
- EODHD vs Financial Modeling Prep
- EODHD vs Finnhub
- Benzinga vs Financial Modeling Prep
- Benzinga vs Finnhub
Machine-readable
- This page as Markdown
/compare/financial-modeling-prep-vs-finnhub.md· slim.min.md· JSON.json(or sendAccept: text/markdown) - Each listing in full
/api/v1/tools/financial-modeling-prep.json·/api/v1/tools/finnhub.json - From a terminal
anchor compare financial-modeling-prep finnhub(the CLI) - Over MCP
compare_tools {"a": "financial-modeling-prep", "b": "finnhub"}at/mcp, no key