Head to head · Shipping rates · October 2026 research run

Easyship vs Shippo

Easyship scores 68.8 (B) on agent readiness against Shippo's 61.9 (C), and leads in 5 of 7 scored categories. Shippo leads on maintenance & community. Both do shipping rates.

Which one, for what

Easyship B

Good for An agent that ships parcels for a small or mid-sized merchant, mostly cross-border, and wants rates, labels, duties and pickups from one account without carrier contracts.

Ahead on

  • Reliability, 80 against 59
  • Agent ergonomics, 73 against 64
  • Security & auth, 61 against 52
  • Transparency & trust, 71 against 61

Also in its favour

  • Runs on your own machine

Watch for

No idempotency keys in the 132-operation spec, and no Retry-After or backoff guidance for 429

Shippo C

Good for An agent that quotes and buys parcel labels across USPS, UPS, FedEx and DHL Express for a small or mid-size shipper, with a free test mode and public unit prices.

Ahead on

  • Maintenance & community, 77 against 56

Watch for

No idempotency key on label purchase or other writes. Only the Reporting API accepts one

Score by category

CategoryWeight this runEasyshipShippoEdge
Reliability16%208059Easyship +21
Performance10%pendingpendingpendingnot scored in this run
Schema & documentation13%16.28783Easyship +4
Agent ergonomics13%16.27364Easyship +9
Security & auth14%17.56152Easyship +9
Payments & pricing10%12.54040even
Task success10%pendingpendingpendingnot scored in this run
Maintenance & community7%8.85677Shippo +21
Transparency & trust7%8.87161Easyship +10
Negative events≤1500
Total68.8 · B61.9 · C

Facts side by side

FactEasyshipShippo
KindHTTP APIHTTP API
VendorEasyship Inc.Shippo
Hosted endpointhttps://public-api.easyship.comhttps://api.goshippo.com
TransportsHTTP, Streamable HTTP, stdioHTTP
AuthOAuth or keyOAuth or key
PricingFreemiumFreemium
Price for shipping rates$0.01 per call$0.01 per call
x402nono
LicenceProprietary service under Easyship's terms of service. The easyship-mcp server on PyPI and the plugin repository are MITProprietary service under Shippo's terms of use. The SDKs and the goshippo/ai repository (skills and MCP bridge) are MIT
Tools exposed254
Read-only variant documentednono
llms.txtyesyes
MCP registrycom.easyship/mcpcom.shippo/shippo-mcp
Last release2026-08-212026-10-01
Terms last updated2026-07-28couldn't be read
Privacy policy last updated2026-07-28couldn't be read
Customer content may train modelsnot found in the textcouldn't be read
Terms restrict automated accessyescouldn't be read
Terms restrict benchmarkingnot found in the textcouldn't be read
Terms or service can change without noticeyescouldn't be read
Arbitration or class-action waivernot found in the textcouldn't be read
Popularity0 stars, 79 PyPI/wk3 stars, 73k npm/wk, 20k PyPI/wk

Verdicts

Easyship

Per-resource read and write scopes, separate sandbox tokens, a 132-operation OpenAPI contract and a 25-tool hosted MCP server with read-only and destructive annotations on every tool. No idempotency keys or Retry-After were found, the MCP server has no test mode, and the API changelog's last entry is dated 30 October 2025.

Shippo

Per-label and per-call prices are public, test keys are self-serve, and the OpenAPI spec, llms.txt and Markdown docs are open to a fetch. Label purchase has no idempotency key, API keys carry no scopes, and the status page logged carrier-side incidents on most days between July and October 2026.

Before you call either

Easyship

  1. Use a sand_ token against https://public-api-sandbox.easyship.com for API tests. Production rejects sandbox tokens, and sandbox allows 6 requests a minute
  2. The MCP server calls production only. Create the shipment without buy_label first, then call create_label once the user confirms the courier and price
  3. Don't retry a timed-out label purchase blindly. There's no idempotency key, so read the shipment's label_state first
  4. Give every item a category or an hs_code. The API rejects shipments and rates requests that have neither
  5. Stay under 60 requests a minute and 10 a second, and wait for the next window on 429

Shippo

  1. Build and test with a shippo_test_ key. Test and live object IDs are separate, and the hosted MCP server has no test mode
  2. Send Authorization: ShippoToken <key>, not Bearer, and pin Shippo-API-Version: 2018-02-08
  3. Before retrying a failed POST /transactions, list recent transactions. There is no idempotency key, and a second purchase is a second charge
  4. Pass async: false on shipments and transactions, or poll the object until its status leaves QUEUED
  5. Set results on list calls (under 200). Defaults vary by resource, and list calls are limited to 50 a minute on live keys

Questions

Which is better for AI agents, Easyship or Shippo?

Easyship scores 68.8 (B) on agent readiness against Shippo's 61.9 (C), and leads in 5 of 7 scored categories. Shippo leads on maintenance & community.

Which is cheaper for shipping rates, Easyship or Shippo?

They cost about the same, $0.01 per call for Easyship and $0.01 per call for Shippo. These are the vendors' published prices for the job.

Do Easyship and Shippo need an API key?

Both take an API key or an OAuth sign-in.

Can an agent call Easyship and Shippo without installing anything?

Yes. Easyship has a hosted endpoint at https://public-api.easyship.com and Shippo at https://api.goshippo.com.

Other comparisons with Easyship or Shippo

Machine-readable

For companies

Do agents find, use and choose your tools?

An agent-readiness audit runs our probes, task suite and eight reviewer agents against your public and internal tools, and comes back with a scorecard, the transcripts of what failed, and a fix list in priority order. From $2,500, re-run included. We never take payment to move a rank. We do help companies earn one.