# Easyship vs Shippo > Easyship scores 68.8 (B) on agent readiness against Shippo's 61.9 (C), and leads in 5 of 7 scored categories. Shippo leads on maintenance & community. Both do shipping rates. Category scores, facts, verdicts and agent notes side by side. - Canonical: https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/easyship-vs-shippo - Markdown: https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/easyship-vs-shippo.md (~2,000 tokens) - Slim: https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/easyship-vs-shippo.min.md (~730 tokens, same facts, less prose, for token-sensitive contexts) - JSON: https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/easyship-vs-shippo.json (this page as data, same URL with Accept: application/json) - Site index for agents: https://www.anchorterminal.com/llms.txt (full text: https://www.anchorterminal.com/llms-full.txt) - API: https://www.anchorterminal.com/api/v1/index.json - Updated: 2026-10-08 Easyship scores 68.8 (B) on agent readiness against Shippo's 61.9 (C), and leads in 5 of 7 scored categories. Shippo leads on maintenance & community. Both do shipping rates. - Easyship: grade B, 68.8/100, rank #163 of 629. Markdown https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/easyship.md · JSON https://www.anchorterminal.com/api/v1/tools/easyship.json - Shippo: grade C, 61.9/100, rank #317 of 629. Markdown https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/shippo.md · JSON https://www.anchorterminal.com/api/v1/tools/shippo.json ## Which one, for what ### Easyship (B) Good for: An agent that ships parcels for a small or mid-sized merchant, mostly cross-border, and wants rates, labels, duties and pickups from one account without carrier contracts. Ahead on: - Reliability, 80 against 59 - Agent ergonomics, 73 against 64 - Security & auth, 61 against 52 - Transparency & trust, 71 against 61 Also in its favour: - Runs on your own machine Watch for: No idempotency keys in the 132-operation spec, and no Retry-After or backoff guidance for 429 ### Shippo (C) Good for: An agent that quotes and buys parcel labels across USPS, UPS, FedEx and DHL Express for a small or mid-size shipper, with a free test mode and public unit prices. Ahead on: - Maintenance & community, 77 against 56 Watch for: No idempotency key on label purchase or other writes. Only the Reporting API accepts one ## Score by category | Category | Weight | Easyship | Shippo | Edge | | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | | Reliability | 16% (20 this run) | 80 | 59 | Easyship +21 | | Performance | 10%, pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run | | Schema & documentation | 13% (16.2 this run) | 87 | 83 | Easyship +4 | | Agent ergonomics | 13% (16.2 this run) | 73 | 64 | Easyship +9 | | Security & auth | 14% (17.5 this run) | 61 | 52 | Easyship +9 | | Payments & pricing | 10% (12.5 this run) | 40 | 40 | even | | Task success | 10%, pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run | | Maintenance & community | 7% (8.8 this run) | 56 | 77 | Shippo +21 | | Transparency & trust | 7% (8.8 this run) | 71 | 61 | Easyship +10 | | Negative events | ≤15 | 0 | 0 | | | **Total** | | **68.8 · B** | **61.9 · C** | | ## Facts side by side | Fact | Easyship | Shippo | | --- | --- | --- | | Kind | HTTP API | HTTP API | | Vendor | Easyship Inc. | Shippo | | Hosted endpoint | `https://public-api.easyship.com` | `https://api.goshippo.com` | | Transports | HTTP, Streamable HTTP, stdio | HTTP | | Auth | OAuth or key | OAuth or key | | Pricing | Freemium | Freemium | | Price for shipping rates | $0.01 per call | $0.01 per call | | x402 | no | no | | Licence | Proprietary service under Easyship's terms of service. The easyship-mcp server on PyPI and the plugin repository are MIT | Proprietary service under Shippo's terms of use. The SDKs and the goshippo/ai repository (skills and MCP bridge) are MIT | | Tools exposed | 25 | 4 | | Read-only variant documented | no | no | | llms.txt | yes | yes | | MCP registry | `com.easyship/mcp` | `com.shippo/shippo-mcp` | | Last release | 2026-08-21 | 2026-10-01 | | Terms last updated | 2026-07-28 | couldn't be read | | Privacy policy last updated | 2026-07-28 | couldn't be read | | Customer content may train models | not found in the text | couldn't be read | | Terms restrict automated access | yes | couldn't be read | | Terms restrict benchmarking | not found in the text | couldn't be read | | Terms or service can change without notice | yes | couldn't be read | | Arbitration or class-action waiver | not found in the text | couldn't be read | | Popularity | 0 stars, 79 PyPI/wk | 3 stars, 73k npm/wk, 20k PyPI/wk | ## Verdicts **Easyship.** Per-resource read and write scopes, separate sandbox tokens, a 132-operation OpenAPI contract and a 25-tool hosted MCP server with read-only and destructive annotations on every tool. No idempotency keys or Retry-After were found, the MCP server has no test mode, and the API changelog's last entry is dated 30 October 2025. **Shippo.** Per-label and per-call prices are public, test keys are self-serve, and the OpenAPI spec, llms.txt and Markdown docs are open to a fetch. Label purchase has no idempotency key, API keys carry no scopes, and the status page logged carrier-side incidents on most days between July and October 2026. ## Before you call either ### Easyship 1. Use a sand_ token against https://public-api-sandbox.easyship.com for API tests. Production rejects sandbox tokens, and sandbox allows 6 requests a minute 2. The MCP server calls production only. Create the shipment without buy_label first, then call create_label once the user confirms the courier and price 3. Don't retry a timed-out label purchase blindly. There's no idempotency key, so read the shipment's label_state first 4. Give every item a category or an hs_code. The API rejects shipments and rates requests that have neither 5. Stay under 60 requests a minute and 10 a second, and wait for the next window on 429 ### Shippo 1. Build and test with a shippo_test_ key. Test and live object IDs are separate, and the hosted MCP server has no test mode 2. Send `Authorization: ShippoToken `, not Bearer, and pin `Shippo-API-Version: 2018-02-08` 3. Before retrying a failed POST /transactions, list recent transactions. There is no idempotency key, and a second purchase is a second charge 4. Pass `async: false` on shipments and transactions, or poll the object until its status leaves QUEUED 5. Set `results` on list calls (under 200). Defaults vary by resource, and list calls are limited to 50 a minute on live keys ## Questions ### Which is better for AI agents, Easyship or Shippo? Easyship scores 68.8 (B) on agent readiness against Shippo's 61.9 (C), and leads in 5 of 7 scored categories. Shippo leads on maintenance & community. ### Which is cheaper for shipping rates, Easyship or Shippo? They cost about the same, $0.01 per call for Easyship and $0.01 per call for Shippo. These are the vendors' published prices for the job. ### Do Easyship and Shippo need an API key? Both take an API key or an OAuth sign-in. ### Can an agent call Easyship and Shippo without installing anything? Yes. Easyship has a hosted endpoint at https://public-api.easyship.com and Shippo at https://api.goshippo.com. ## For agents - This comparison as JSON: https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/easyship-vs-shippo.json, and with the fewest tokens: https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/easyship-vs-shippo.min.md - Over MCP at https://www.anchorterminal.com/mcp (no key): `compare_tools {"a": "easyship", "b": "shippo"}`. From a terminal: `anchor compare easyship shippo` - Each listing in full: https://www.anchorterminal.com/api/v1/tools/easyship.json and https://www.anchorterminal.com/api/v1/tools/shippo.json ## Other comparisons with Easyship or Shippo - [EasyPost vs Easyship](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/easypost-vs-easyship.md) - [EasyPost vs Shippo](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/easypost-vs-shippo.md) - [Easyship vs Sendcloud](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/easyship-vs-sendcloud.md) - [Easyship vs ShipStation API](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/easyship-vs-shipstation.md) - [Sendcloud vs Shippo](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/sendcloud-vs-shippo.md) - [Shippo vs ShipStation API](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/shippo-vs-shipstation.md)