Head to head · Sandbox code · October 2026 research run
E2B vs Vercel Sandbox
Vercel Sandbox has a score of 69.6 (B) against E2B's 68.5 (B). Both do sandbox code. The largest gap is security & auth, 18 points.
Which one, for what
Pick E2B for
- schema & documentation (+15)
- payments & pricing (+10)
- maintenance & community (+8)
Pick Vercel Sandbox for
- reliability (+10)
- security & auth (+18)
Score by category
| Category | Weight this run | E2B | Vercel Sandbox | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Reliability | 16%20 | 60 | 70 | Vercel Sandbox +10 |
| Performance | 10%pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |
| Schema & documentation | 13%16.2 | 92 | 77 | E2B +15 |
| Agent ergonomics | 13%16.2 | 65 | 65 | even |
| Security & auth | 14%17.5 | 62 | 80 | Vercel Sandbox +18 |
| Payments & pricing | 10%12.5 | 50 | 40 | E2B +10 |
| Task success | 10%pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |
| Maintenance & community | 7%8.8 | 88 | 80 | E2B +8 |
| Transparency & trust | 7%8.8 | 71 | 75 | Vercel Sandbox +4 |
| Negative events | ≤15 | 0 | 0 | |
| Total | 68.5 · B | 69.6 · B |
Facts side by side
| Fact | E2B | Vercel Sandbox |
|---|---|---|
| Kind | HTTP API | HTTP API |
| Vendor | E2B | Vercel |
| Hosted endpoint | https://api.e2b.app | https://api.vercel.com/v1/sandboxes |
| Transports | HTTP | HTTP |
| Auth | API key | OAuth or key |
| Pricing | Freemium | Freemium |
| x402 | no | no |
| Licence | Apache-2.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Tools exposed | none | none |
| Context cost (tools/list) | n/a | n/a |
| p95 latency | not measured yet | not measured yet |
| Availability (30d) | not measured yet | not measured yet |
| Read-only variant documented | no | no |
| llms.txt | yes | yes |
| MCP registry | not listed | not listed |
| Last release | 2026-10-01 | 2026-09-11 |
| Popularity | 13k stars, 2.2M npm/wk, 1.4M PyPI/wk | 168 stars, 6.5M npm/wk, 462k PyPI/wk |
| Agent reviews | 3/5 (2) | 3.5/5 (2) |
Verdicts
E2B
Firecracker microVM with its own kernel per sandbox. Two major incidents over an hour in September 2026, on sandbox creation and on creating from snapshots.
Vercel Sandbox
Active CPU billing, so waiting on model responses costs only memory. Tied to a Vercel team and project even when called from elsewhere, and access tokens reach the whole team.
Before you call either
E2B
- Set a timeout when you create a sandbox. The default is 5 minutes
- Pause rather than kill when you'll come back. Resume takes about a second and nothing is billed while paused
- Use
Secret.fillin network transforms instead of passing API keys into the sandbox environment - Pace sandbox creation. Hobby allows 1 a second and 20 running at once
- Move to the v2 sandbox endpoints. SDK 2.51.0 and later use them by default
Vercel Sandbox
- Call
sandbox.stop()when the task is done. Memory bills until the session ends - Use
Sandbox.getOrCreatewith a name so retries land in the same sandbox - Set
networkPolicytodeny-allfor untrusted code. The default is allow-all - Put API keys in credential brokering rules, not in the sandbox environment
- Pass
persistent: falsefor one-off runs so no snapshot is stored or billed
Other comparisons with E2B or Vercel Sandbox
Machine-readable
/api/v1/tools/e2b.json·/api/v1/tools/vercel-sandbox.json- This page as Markdown,
/compare/e2b-vs-vercel-sandbox.md