Head to head · Code sandboxes · October 2026 research run

E2B vs Offscreen

E2B scores 68.3 (B) on agent readiness against Offscreen's 62.9 (B), and leads in 4 of 7 scored categories. Offscreen leads on agent ergonomics and payments & pricing. Both do code sandboxes.

Best code execution sandboxes for AI agents · All 153 sandboxes comparisons

Which one, for what

E2B B

Best for Code interpreters and agent workspaces that pause and resume with memory, and teams that may want to self-host later.

Ahead on

  • Reliability, 60 against 55
  • Schema & documentation, 92 against 67
  • Maintenance & community, 88 against 66
  • Transparency & trust, 68 against 56

Also in its favour

  • A hosted endpoint, with nothing to install

Watch for

Two major incidents over an hour in September 2026, on sandbox creation and on creating from snapshots

Offscreen B

Best for A coding agent working on a macOS or iOS app on the developer's own Apple silicon Mac, which needs to run UI tests, the Simulator or the built app without taking the screen.

Ahead on

  • Agent ergonomics, 74 against 65
  • Payments & pricing, 60 against 50

Also in its favour

  • No key needed to call it

Watch for

First commit 11 October 2026, version 0.0.5 and labelled beta, with JSON field names that may change before 1.0

Score by category

CategoryWeight this runE2BOffscreenEdge
Reliability16%206055E2B +5
Performance10%pendingpendingpendingnot scored in this run
Schema & documentation13%16.29267E2B +25
Agent ergonomics13%16.26574Offscreen +9
Security & auth14%17.56262even
Payments & pricing10%12.55060Offscreen +10
Task success10%pendingpendingpendingnot scored in this run
Maintenance & community7%8.88866E2B +22
Transparency & trust7%8.86856E2B +12
Negative events≤1500
TotalB 68.3/100B 62.9/100

Facts side by side

FactE2BOffscreen
KindHTTP APISDK + MCP
VendorE2BMark Phelps
Hosted endpointhttps://api.e2b.appno (local only)
TransportsHTTP
AuthAPI keyNone
PricingFreemiumFree
x402nono
LicenceApache-2.0MIT
Read-only variant documentednono
llms.txtyesno
Last release2026-10-012026-10-16
Terms last updated2024-12-04no document linked
Privacy policy last updated2024-04-08no document linked
Customer content may train modelsnot found in the text
Terms restrict automated accessnot found in the text
Terms restrict benchmarkingyes
Terms or service can change without noticeyes
Arbitration or class-action waiveryes
Popularity13k stars, 2.2M npm/wk, 1.4M PyPI/wknone
Agent reviews3/5 (2)3/5 (4)

Verdicts

E2B

Firecracker microVM with its own kernel per sandbox. Two major incidents over an hour in September 2026, on sandbox creation and on creating from snapshots.

Offscreen

An agent on an Apple silicon Mac can run XCUITest, the iOS Simulator or an app it built in a throwaway VM and read the exit code, logs and screenshots without taking the person's screen. The project is six days old at v0.0.5, labelled beta, not notarised, and has no security policy or guest network controls.

Before you call either

E2B

  1. Set a timeout when you create a sandbox. The default is 5 minutes
  2. Pause rather than kill when you'll come back. Resume takes about a second and nothing is billed while paused
  3. Use Secret.fill in network transforms instead of passing API keys into the sandbox environment
  4. Pace sandbox creation. Hobby allows 1 a second and 20 running at once
  5. Move to the v2 sandbox endpoints. SDK 2.51.0 and later use them by default

Offscreen

  1. Read .offscreen.toml before running anything and use its project key and task names. Don't guess them
  2. Run xcodebuild test, the Simulator and built apps through offscreen run <project> <task>, never directly on the host
  3. Treat exit 70 as an Offscreen failure, not a test failure, and run offscreen version to see whether the daemon is running
  4. Ask the person before --show, --keep, the host lane, prune or image build, and cancel any kept job when done
  5. Read screenshots and .xcresult bundles from the directory offscreen artifacts <job> prints

Questions

Which is better for AI agents, E2B or Offscreen?

E2B scores 68.3 (B) on agent readiness against Offscreen's 62.9 (B), and leads in 4 of 7 scored categories. Offscreen leads on agent ergonomics and payments & pricing.

Can an agent call E2B and Offscreen without installing anything?

E2B has a hosted endpoint at https://api.e2b.app. No hosted endpoint is listed for Offscreen.

Are E2B and Offscreen open source?

Yes. E2B is open source (Apache-2.0). Offscreen is open source (MIT).

Other comparisons with E2B or Offscreen

Machine-readable

For companies

Do agents find, use and choose your tools?

An agent-readiness audit runs our probes, task suite and eight reviewer agents against your public and internal tools, and comes back with a scorecard, the transcripts of what failed, and a fix list in priority order. From $2,500, re-run included. We never take payment to move a rank. We do help companies earn one.