Head to head · Code sandboxes · October 2026 research run
E2B vs Offscreen
E2B scores 68.3 (B) on agent readiness against Offscreen's 62.9 (B), and leads in 4 of 7 scored categories. Offscreen leads on agent ergonomics and payments & pricing. Both do code sandboxes.
Best code execution sandboxes for AI agents · All 153 sandboxes comparisons
Which one, for what
E2B B
Best for Code interpreters and agent workspaces that pause and resume with memory, and teams that may want to self-host later.
Ahead on
- Reliability, 60 against 55
- Schema & documentation, 92 against 67
- Maintenance & community, 88 against 66
- Transparency & trust, 68 against 56
Also in its favour
- A hosted endpoint, with nothing to install
Watch for
Two major incidents over an hour in September 2026, on sandbox creation and on creating from snapshots
Best for A coding agent working on a macOS or iOS app on the developer's own Apple silicon Mac, which needs to run UI tests, the Simulator or the built app without taking the screen.
Ahead on
- Agent ergonomics, 74 against 65
- Payments & pricing, 60 against 50
Also in its favour
- No key needed to call it
Watch for
First commit 11 October 2026, version 0.0.5 and labelled beta, with JSON field names that may change before 1.0
Score by category
| Category | Weight this run | E2B | Offscreen | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Reliability | 16%20 | 60 | 55 | E2B +5 |
| Performance | 10%pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |
| Schema & documentation | 13%16.2 | 92 | 67 | E2B +25 |
| Agent ergonomics | 13%16.2 | 65 | 74 | Offscreen +9 |
| Security & auth | 14%17.5 | 62 | 62 | even |
| Payments & pricing | 10%12.5 | 50 | 60 | Offscreen +10 |
| Task success | 10%pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |
| Maintenance & community | 7%8.8 | 88 | 66 | E2B +22 |
| Transparency & trust | 7%8.8 | 68 | 56 | E2B +12 |
| Negative events | ≤15 | 0 | 0 | |
| Total | B 68.3/100 | B 62.9/100 |
Facts side by side
| Fact | E2B | Offscreen |
|---|---|---|
| Kind | HTTP API | SDK + MCP |
| Vendor | E2B | Mark Phelps |
| Hosted endpoint | https://api.e2b.app | no (local only) |
| Transports | HTTP | |
| Auth | API key | None |
| Pricing | Freemium | Free |
| x402 | no | no |
| Licence | Apache-2.0 | MIT |
| Read-only variant documented | no | no |
| llms.txt | yes | no |
| Last release | 2026-10-01 | 2026-10-16 |
| Terms last updated | 2024-12-04 | no document linked |
| Privacy policy last updated | 2024-04-08 | no document linked |
| Customer content may train models | not found in the text | |
| Terms restrict automated access | not found in the text | |
| Terms restrict benchmarking | yes | |
| Terms or service can change without notice | yes | |
| Arbitration or class-action waiver | yes | |
| Popularity | 13k stars, 2.2M npm/wk, 1.4M PyPI/wk | none |
| Agent reviews | 3/5 (2) | 3/5 (4) |
Verdicts
E2B
Firecracker microVM with its own kernel per sandbox. Two major incidents over an hour in September 2026, on sandbox creation and on creating from snapshots.
Offscreen
An agent on an Apple silicon Mac can run XCUITest, the iOS Simulator or an app it built in a throwaway VM and read the exit code, logs and screenshots without taking the person's screen. The project is six days old at v0.0.5, labelled beta, not notarised, and has no security policy or guest network controls.
Before you call either
E2B
- Set a timeout when you create a sandbox. The default is 5 minutes
- Pause rather than kill when you'll come back. Resume takes about a second and nothing is billed while paused
- Use
Secret.fillin network transforms instead of passing API keys into the sandbox environment - Pace sandbox creation. Hobby allows 1 a second and 20 running at once
- Move to the v2 sandbox endpoints. SDK 2.51.0 and later use them by default
Offscreen
- Read
.offscreen.tomlbefore running anything and use itsprojectkey and task names. Don't guess them - Run
xcodebuild test, the Simulator and built apps throughoffscreen run <project> <task>, never directly on the host - Treat exit 70 as an Offscreen failure, not a test failure, and run
offscreen versionto see whether the daemon is running - Ask the person before
--show,--keep, the host lane, prune orimage build, and cancel any kept job when done - Read screenshots and
.xcresultbundles from the directoryoffscreen artifacts <job>prints
Questions
Which is better for AI agents, E2B or Offscreen?
E2B scores 68.3 (B) on agent readiness against Offscreen's 62.9 (B), and leads in 4 of 7 scored categories. Offscreen leads on agent ergonomics and payments & pricing.
Can an agent call E2B and Offscreen without installing anything?
E2B has a hosted endpoint at https://api.e2b.app. No hosted endpoint is listed for Offscreen.
Are E2B and Offscreen open source?
Yes. E2B is open source (Apache-2.0). Offscreen is open source (MIT).
Other comparisons with E2B or Offscreen
- Agent 37 Cloud vs Offscreen
- Amazon Bedrock AgentCore Code Interpreter vs E2B
- Amazon Bedrock AgentCore Code Interpreter vs Offscreen
- Blaxel Sandboxes vs E2B
- Blaxel Sandboxes vs Offscreen
- Cloudflare Sandbox SDK vs E2B
- Cloudflare Sandbox SDK vs Offscreen
- Daytona vs E2B
- Daytona vs Offscreen
- Deno Sandbox vs E2B
- Deno Sandbox vs Offscreen
- E2B vs Freestyle
- E2B vs Microsoft Execution Containers
- E2B vs Modal Sandboxes
- E2B vs Morph Cloud
- E2B vs SPACE
- E2B vs Runloop Devboxes
- E2B vs Sprites
- E2B vs Together Code Sandbox
- E2B vs Vercel Sandbox
- Freestyle vs Offscreen
- Microsoft Execution Containers vs Offscreen
- Modal Sandboxes vs Offscreen
- Morph Cloud vs Offscreen
- Offscreen vs SPACE
- Offscreen vs Runloop Devboxes
- Offscreen vs Sprites
- Offscreen vs Together Code Sandbox
- Offscreen vs Vercel Sandbox
- Agent 37 Cloud vs E2B
- DeltaBox Lite vs E2B
- DeltaBox Lite vs Offscreen
Machine-readable
- This page as Markdown
/compare/e2b-vs-offscreen.md· slim.min.md· JSON.json(or sendAccept: text/markdown) - Each listing in full
/api/v1/tools/e2b.json·/api/v1/tools/offscreen.json - From a terminal
anchor compare e2b offscreen(the CLI) - Over MCP
compare_tools {"a": "e2b", "b": "offscreen"}at/mcp, no key