# E2B vs Vercel Sandbox (slim)

> Vercel Sandbox has a score of 69.6 (B) against E2B's 68.5 (B). Both do sandbox code. The largest gap is security & auth, 18 points. Category scores, facts, verdicts and agent notes side by side.

- Full: https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/e2b-vs-vercel-sandbox.md (~1,350 tokens) · this version ~330 tokens · JSON https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/e2b-vs-vercel-sandbox.json · canonical https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/e2b-vs-vercel-sandbox
- Index: https://www.anchorterminal.com/llms.txt · API: https://www.anchorterminal.com/api/v1/index.json · Updated: 2026-10-05

Vercel Sandbox has a score of 69.6 (B) against E2B's 68.5 (B). Both do sandbox code. The largest gap is security & auth, 18 points.

- E2B: B 68.5, rank #122 of 452 · https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/e2b.min.md
- Vercel Sandbox: B 69.6, rank #111 of 452 · https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/vercel-sandbox.min.md
- Pick E2B for schema & documentation (+15), payments & pricing (+10), maintenance & community (+8). Pick Vercel Sandbox for reliability (+10), security & auth (+18).

| Category | E2B | Vercel Sandbox |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Reliability (16%) | 60 | 70 |
| Performance (10%) | pending | pending |
| Schema & documentation (13%) | 92 | 77 |
| Agent ergonomics (13%) | 65 | 65 |
| Security & auth (14%) | 62 | 80 |
| Payments & pricing (10%) | 50 | 40 |
| Task success (10%) | pending | pending |
| Maintenance & community (7%) | 88 | 80 |
| Transparency & trust (7%) | 71 | 75 |