Head to head · Local inference · October 2026 research run
Docker Model Runner vs TextGen
Docker Model Runner scores 57.1 (C) on agent readiness against TextGen's 45.1 (E), and leads in 4 of 7 scored categories. TextGen leads on schema & documentation. Both do local inference.
Which one, for what
Good for A team that already runs Docker and wants local models served to containers and Compose services through OpenAI-, Anthropic- or Ollama-compatible routes, with models stored as OCI artefacts.
Ahead on
- Reliability, 85 against 51
- Agent ergonomics, 58 against 50
- Maintenance & community, 55 against 24
- Transparency & trust, 73 against 49
Also in its favour
- No key needed to call it
Watch for
No credential on the API. The docs say any client that can reach it, including other containers, can pull, load and run models
TextGen E
Good for A person who wants one app for several backends (llama.cpp, ExLlamaV3, Transformers) with an OpenAI and Anthropic-compatible endpoint, LoRA training and image generation.
Ahead on
- Schema & documentation, 61 against 49
Watch for
No release since v4.9 on 20 May 2026 and no code commit on main or dev since 31 May 2026
Score by category
| Category | Weight this run | Docker Model Runner | TextGen | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Reliability | 16%20 | 85 | 51 | Docker Model Runner +34 |
| Performance | 10%pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |
| Schema & documentation | 13%16.2 | 49 | 61 | TextGen +12 |
| Agent ergonomics | 13%16.2 | 58 | 50 | Docker Model Runner +8 |
| Security & auth | 14%17.5 | 40 | 40 | even |
| Payments & pricing | 10%12.5 | 60 | 60 | even |
| Task success | 10%pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |
| Maintenance & community | 7%8.8 | 55 | 24 | Docker Model Runner +31 |
| Transparency & trust | 7%8.8 | 73 | 49 | Docker Model Runner +24 |
| Negative events | ≤15 | -3 | -4 | |
| Total | 57.1 · C | 45.1 · E |
Facts side by side
| Fact | Docker Model Runner | TextGen |
|---|---|---|
| Kind | HTTP API | Model platform |
| Vendor | Docker, Inc. | oobabooga |
| Hosted endpoint | no (local only) | no (local only) |
| Transports | HTTP | HTTP |
| Auth | None | API key |
| Pricing | Free | Free |
| x402 | no | no |
| Licence | Apache-2.0 (server, CLI plugin and dmr binary). Docker Desktop, which bundles it, is closed software under Docker's subscription agreement, and each model carries its own licence | AGPL-3.0 |
| Read-only variant documented | no | no |
| llms.txt | yes | no |
| Last release | 2026-08-12 | 2026-05-20 |
| Terms last updated | 2026-08-26 | no document linked |
| Privacy policy last updated | 2026-08-26 | no document linked |
| Customer content may train models | not found in the text | |
| Terms restrict automated access | yes | |
| Terms restrict benchmarking | yes | |
| Terms or service can change without notice | not found in the text | |
| Arbitration or class-action waiver | yes | |
| Popularity | 656 stars | 48k stars |
Verdicts
Docker Model Runner
CI passes on the main branch, and Docker has published two security advisories with CVEs and fixed versions for the project. The API takes no credential, so any client or container that reaches it can pull, delete and run models, and the documentation has no OpenAPI file or error reference.
TextGen
AGPL-3.0 with no telemetry, and a local API on 127.0.0.1:5000 that checks the Host header, limits CORS to localhost and separates an admin key from the caller's key. No release since v4.9 on 20 May 2026, no code commits since 31 May, no test suite, and ten security advisories in the year, all fixed.
Before you call either
Docker Model Runner
- Use base URL
http://localhost:12434/engines/v1for OpenAI clients andhttp://localhost:12434for Anthropic and Ollama clients. Any API key value is accepted - In Docker Desktop, run
docker desktop enable model-runner --tcp 12434first. Host-side TCP is off by default - From a container, call
http://model-runner.docker.internalon Docker Desktop orhttp://172.17.0.1:12434on Docker Engine - Raise the context before agent work with
docker model configure --context-size <n> <model>. The llama.cpp default is 4,096 tokens - Name models with their namespace, such as
ai/smollm2, and expect plain-text error bodies with a 400, 404, 500 or 503 status
TextGen
- Ask the owner to launch with
--api. Nothing listens on port 5000 without it, and a model must be loaded first - Call
http://127.0.0.1:5000/v1. Any Host header other than localhost or 127.0.0.1 gets 400Invalid host headerunless--listenis set - Send the key as
Authorization: Beareron OpenAI routes and asx-api-keyon/v1/messages. Model loading needs the admin key - Read
http://127.0.0.1:5000/docsormodules/api/typing.pyfor parameters.max_tokensdefaults to 512 on chat completions - Run tool calls yourself. The API returns
finish_reason: "tool_calls"and executes nothing on the server - Use the repository name
oobabooga/textgen. The oldtext-generation-webuiURL redirects
Questions
Which is better for AI agents, Docker Model Runner or TextGen?
Docker Model Runner scores 57.1 (C) on agent readiness against TextGen's 45.1 (E), and leads in 4 of 7 scored categories. TextGen leads on schema & documentation.
Can an agent call Docker Model Runner and TextGen without installing anything?
No hosted endpoint is listed for Docker Model Runner. No hosted endpoint is listed for TextGen.
Are Docker Model Runner and TextGen open source?
Yes. Docker Model Runner is open source (Apache-2.0 (server, CLI plugin and `dmr` binary). Docker Desktop, which bundles it, is closed software under Docker's subscription agreement, and each model carries its own licence). TextGen is open source (AGPL-3.0).
Other comparisons with Docker Model Runner or TextGen
- AnythingLLM vs Docker Model Runner
- AnythingLLM vs TextGen
- Docker Model Runner vs Foundry Local
- Docker Model Runner vs Core
- Docker Model Runner vs GPT4All
- Docker Model Runner vs Jan
- Docker Model Runner vs Khoj
- Docker Model Runner vs KoboldCpp
- Docker Model Runner vs Lemonade
- Docker Model Runner vs llama.cpp
- Docker Model Runner vs LM Studio
- Docker Model Runner vs LocalAI
- Docker Model Runner vs MLX LM
- Docker Model Runner vs Ollama
- Docker Model Runner vs Open WebUI
- Docker Model Runner vs screenpipe
- Foundry Local vs TextGen
- Core vs TextGen
- GPT4All vs TextGen
- Jan vs TextGen
- Khoj vs TextGen
- KoboldCpp vs TextGen
- Lemonade vs TextGen
- llama.cpp vs TextGen
- LM Studio vs TextGen
- LocalAI vs TextGen
- MLX LM vs TextGen
- Ollama vs TextGen
- Open WebUI vs TextGen
- screenpipe vs TextGen
- Docker Model Runner vs Underdog
- TextGen vs Underdog
Machine-readable
- This page as Markdown
/compare/docker-model-runner-vs-text-generation-webui.md· slim.min.md· JSON.json(or sendAccept: text/markdown) - Each listing in full
/api/v1/tools/docker-model-runner.json·/api/v1/tools/text-generation-webui.json - From a terminal
anchor compare docker-model-runner text-generation-webui(the CLI) - Over MCP
compare_tools {"a": "docker-model-runner", "b": "text-generation-webui"}at/mcp, no key