Head to head · Agent harnesses · October 2026 research run
dsh-superagent (DeepSeek) vs Letta
Letta scores 59.7 (C) on agent readiness against dsh-superagent (DeepSeek)'s 42.1 (E), and leads in 6 of 7 scored categories. Both do agent harnesses.
Best agent harnesses and coding agents · All 1500 harnesses comparisons
Best memory layers for AI agents · All 353 memory comparisons
Which one, for what
Best for Teams on github.com that want a DeepSeek Harness agent to turn allowed people's issue requests into pull requests, run on an isolated machine or OS account.
Also in its favour
- Free to start without a card
Watch for
Executor and main Sessions run with danger-full-access as the operator's OS user, and the docs say a worker can read the operator's home directory
Letta C
Best for Long-lived coding agents and assistants that keep memory and identity across sessions and machines.
Ahead on
- Reliability, 58 against 15
- Schema & documentation, 70 against 61
- Payments & pricing, 60 against 40
- Maintenance & community, 85 against 34
Also in its favour
- Runs on your own machine
Watch for
The default permission mode is unrestricted, the renamed bypassPermissions, so tool calls aren't confirmed unless the user picks another mode
Why the edge
Each category where one leads by five points or more, with the reason behind each side's score from its assessment. The numbers are in the table below; this is what they stand for.
Maintenance & community Letta +51
dsh-superagent (DeepSeek) 34
Published on 31 October 2026, within 30 days, read as the last published change since no tag or release was found (30). One publication, so not three releases in 90 days (0). Issues, pull requests and Discussions couldn't be read, and the README frames the code as a reference prototype adapted from an internal version (0). No official SDK or registry entry (0). Exact dependency pins and a lockfile, but no CI workflow found, and the docs pin DSH 0.2.1-rc.3 (23 October 2026) while npm latest is 0.2.1-rc.5 (29 October 2026) (4).
Letta 85
v0.34.42 on 6 November 2026 (30). Dozens of releases in 90 days (20). Pull requests are merged daily; recent issues from users have few replies (15 of 25). npm and PyPI packages and the Agent SDK track the releases (12 of 15). Lock files, CI and nightly smoke tests (8 of 10). Total 85.
Reliability Letta +43
dsh-superagent (DeepSeek) 15
Local-package reading, since it runs as a DSH bundle on the operator's machine. Not published to npm (private: true in package.json, and the registry has no dsh-superagent). It installs from a git clone with pnpm install && pnpm build on top of @deepseek-ai/dsh@0.2.1-rc.3, with Node 22.19+ or 24+, git 2.32+, Python 3.8+, tmux and gh 2.48+ stated, so half credit (10). A vitest suite of about 25 spec files is listed in docs/007, and pnpm check runs the typecheck, tests and build. Two spec files were read on raw.githubusercontent.com. No CI workflow was found at five common paths under .github/workflows, and the directory couldn't be listed (5). Open issues couldn't be read, because github.com and api.github.com weren't reachable from our network. Unchecked, so scored absent (0). Version 0.1.0 with no tag, release or changelog found, so no semver record (0). A research prototype, not stable (0).
Letta 58
Local-software lines, read for the harness. @letta-ai/letta-code on npm with Node.js 22.19 or newer, and PyPI wheels for glibc Linux, macOS 14 and Windows x64 with Python 3.9 or newer stated (20). ci.yml, nightly update smoke tests and Telegram live smoke tests exist, but GitHub's API answered with a rate limit, so run results were unread (15 of 25, unchecked). 332 open issues and pull requests, mostly pull requests; recent bug reports such as recall reading the wrong conversation have no reply yet (15 of 25). 398 tags at 0.34.x with release notes on GitHub, no changelog file, and breaking removals such as AgentFile announced in the README (8 of 15). Pre-1.0 (0). Total 58.
Payments & pricing Letta +20
dsh-superagent (DeepSeek) 40
Self-hosted rule, as for the other open-source harnesses. No payment protocol (0). Free under MIT with nothing to buy (20). No card for the software (20). An agent can't get started alone, because the setup needs a person to create a dedicated GitHub user account, accept the repository invitation and run auth login for the wrappers, which SETUP.md lists as operator steps. 0, as the other harnesses that need an account were read (0). The model provider is a separate purchase.
Letta 60
No x402, MPP or L402 (0 of 40). Per-unit API prices are public, $0.10 per active agent a month and $0.00015 a second of tool execution, plus plan prices (20). A $0 plan with bring-your-own keys; no card is mentioned (20). The CLI runs locally without signing in (20). Total 60.
Schema & documentation Letta +9
dsh-superagent (DeepSeek) 61
Framework reading, as for deepseek-harness. No OpenAPI or JSON Schema is published. docs/006 documents the Management API's routes, fields, block shapes and refusals in tables, and the code validates settings with zod (12). Markdown docs in the repository, readable raw, and a SETUP.md written for a coding agent. No llms.txt (5). Nine numbered documents read in order, each stating purpose, limits and what not to do, such as never rerunning the profile-creation command for an upgrade (17). Closed sets for accept mode (off, observe, auto), admission cells, Source states, health states and listen (12). A worked curl example, refusals as 400, 404, 409 and 500 with issues, setup or code, a troubleshooting table and status exit codes 0 to 3 (13). package.json says 0.1.0 and pins an engines.dsh range, but no changelog or tags were found (2).
Letta 70
Harness reading. docs.letta.com serves llms.txt and a Markdown version of every page, with an applies_to block saying which backend and interface each page covers (10). TypeScript types for the Agent SDK and a documented App Server WebSocket protocol, but no JSON Schema or OpenAPI for the harness (15 of 25). Pages say when to use local or cloud backends, subagents and channels (14 of 20). Permission modes and options are typed in the SDK (12 of 15). Example applications and a remote client reference (11 of 15). Releases most days but no changelog file (8 of 15). Total 70.
Score by category
| Category | Weight this run | dsh-superagent (DeepSeek) | Letta | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Reliability | 16%20 | 15 | 58 | Letta +43 |
| Performance | 10%pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |
| Schema & documentation | 13%16.2 | 61 | 70 | Letta +9 |
| Agent ergonomics | 13%16.2 | 67 | 67 | even |
| Security & auth | 14%17.5 | 33 | 35 | Letta +2 |
| Payments & pricing | 10%12.5 | 40 | 60 | Letta +20 |
| Task success | 10%pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |
| Maintenance & community | 7%8.8 | 34 | 85 | Letta +51 |
| Transparency & trust | 7%8.8 | 52 | 55 | Letta +3 |
| Negative events | ≤15 | 0 | 0 | |
| Total | E 42.1/100 | C 59.7/100 |
Facts side by side
| Fact | dsh-superagent (DeepSeek) | Letta |
|---|---|---|
| Kind | Agent harness | Agent harness |
| Vendor | DeepSeek | Letta |
| Hosted endpoint | no (local only) | no (local only) |
| Transports | stdio | |
| Auth | Token | OAuth or key |
| Pricing | Free | Freemium |
| x402 | no | no |
| Licence | MIT | Apache-2.0 |
| Read-only variant documented | no | no |
| llms.txt | no | yes |
| Last release | 2026-10-31 | 2026-11-06 |
| Terms last updated | no document linked | no date given |
| Privacy policy last updated | 2026-09-20 | no date given |
| Customer content may train models | not read yet | not found in the text |
| Terms restrict automated access | not read yet | not found in the text |
| Terms restrict benchmarking | not read yet | not found in the text |
| Terms or service can change without notice | not read yet | not found in the text |
| Arbitration or class-action waiver | not read yet | yes |
| Popularity | none | 3.8k stars, 86k npm/wk, 2.2k PyPI/wk |
Verdicts
dsh-superagent (DeepSeek)
The authorization design is careful, with allowed lists, Mandates and a Policy enforced in code, proactive work only recorded by default and auto-merge off. Executors run every command without approval under the operator's OS user, and the README calls it a research prototype with no release, changelog or security policy.
Letta
Letta's open-source harness gives agents git-tracked memory blocks, skills, subagents and headless JSON runs, with a $0 plan and public per-agent API prices. It starts in the unrestricted permission mode, defaults to Letta Cloud, sends usage telemetry unless LETTA_CODE_TELEM=0 is set, and the V1 API server the comparisons describe is retired.
Before you call either
dsh-superagent (DeepSeek)
- Run it under a dedicated OS account holding only the agent's credentials. Executors run commands without approval and can read the operator's home directory
- Set
enabled: falseon thesession-log-deepseekrow of thesuperagentprofile before using DeepSeek's official API on private code - Keep the accept mode at
observeand the allowed list short until the recorded Decisions look right - Wait for
scripts/dsh-superagent statusto stop exiting 1 after any save that answersrestarting: truebefore the next request - Send
x-orchestrator-request: 1and a loopback Host to the Management API, and sendrevisionwith each PUT, since a stale one gets 409
Letta
- Start headless runs with an explicit permission mode such as
standardorstrict; the default auto-approves tools - Pass
--backend localfor work that must stay on the machine, since Letta Cloud is the default - Set LETTA_CODE_TELEM=0 in unattended runs if usage events must not be sent
- Use
letta -p --output-format jsonfor scripted runs and parse the JSON, not the terminal output - Don't plan on the retired V1 REST server or
.afAgentFile import; both are gone
Questions
Which is better for AI agents, dsh-superagent (DeepSeek) or Letta?
Letta scores 59.7 (C) on agent readiness against dsh-superagent (DeepSeek)'s 42.1 (E), and leads in 6 of 7 scored categories.
Are dsh-superagent (DeepSeek) and Letta open source?
Yes. dsh-superagent (DeepSeek) is open source (MIT). Letta is open source (Apache-2.0).
Other comparisons with dsh-superagent (DeepSeek) or Letta
- Agent Zero vs dsh-superagent (DeepSeek)
- Agent Zero vs Letta
- Aider vs dsh-superagent (DeepSeek)
- Aider vs Letta
- Amp vs dsh-superagent (DeepSeek)
- Amp vs Letta
- Antigravity CLI vs dsh-superagent (DeepSeek)
- Antigravity CLI vs Letta
- Auggie CLI vs dsh-superagent (DeepSeek)
- Auggie CLI vs Letta
- AXLR vs dsh-superagent (DeepSeek)
- AXLR vs Letta
- Claude Code vs dsh-superagent (DeepSeek)
- Claude Code vs Letta
- Cline vs dsh-superagent (DeepSeek)
- Cline vs Letta
- Conductor vs dsh-superagent (DeepSeek)
- Conductor vs Letta
- Crush vs dsh-superagent (DeepSeek)
- Crush vs Letta
- Cursor CLI vs dsh-superagent (DeepSeek)
- Cursor CLI vs Letta
- DeepSeek Harness (dsh) vs dsh-superagent (DeepSeek)
- DeepSeek Harness (dsh) vs Letta
- dsh-superagent (DeepSeek) vs Devin
- dsh-superagent (DeepSeek) vs Droid CLI
- dsh-superagent (DeepSeek) vs Pi
- dsh-superagent (DeepSeek) vs Emdash
- dsh-superagent (DeepSeek) vs Gemini CLI
- dsh-superagent (DeepSeek) vs GitHub Copilot CLI
- dsh-superagent (DeepSeek) vs goose
- dsh-superagent (DeepSeek) vs Harness²
- dsh-superagent (DeepSeek) vs HarnessRouter
- dsh-superagent (DeepSeek) vs Jules
- dsh-superagent (DeepSeek) vs Junie CLI
- dsh-superagent (DeepSeek) vs Kilo Code CLI
- dsh-superagent (DeepSeek) vs Kimi Code CLI
- dsh-superagent (DeepSeek) vs Kiro CLI
- dsh-superagent (DeepSeek) vs mini-swe-agent
- dsh-superagent (DeepSeek) vs MiniMax Code
- dsh-superagent (DeepSeek) vs Mistral Vibe CLI
- dsh-superagent (DeepSeek) vs Muse Code
- dsh-superagent (DeepSeek) vs OpenAI Agents API
- dsh-superagent (DeepSeek) vs OpenAI Codex
- dsh-superagent (DeepSeek) vs OpenCode
- dsh-superagent (DeepSeek) vs OpenHands
- dsh-superagent (DeepSeek) vs OpenMausBot
- dsh-superagent (DeepSeek) vs Orca
- dsh-superagent (DeepSeek) vs Paseo
- dsh-superagent (DeepSeek) vs Prime Agent
- dsh-superagent (DeepSeek) vs Qoder CLI
- dsh-superagent (DeepSeek) vs Qwen Code
- dsh-superagent (DeepSeek) vs Mirror CLI
- dsh-superagent (DeepSeek) vs Rovo Dev CLI
- dsh-superagent (DeepSeek) vs Sculptor
- dsh-superagent (DeepSeek) vs T3 Code
- dsh-superagent (DeepSeek) vs Traycer
- dsh-superagent (DeepSeek) vs Unstoppable
- dsh-superagent (DeepSeek) vs Verdent
- dsh-superagent (DeepSeek) vs Vibe-Trading
- dsh-superagent (DeepSeek) vs Warp (Warp Agent CLI and the Oz Agent API)
- Devin vs Letta
- Droid CLI vs Letta
- Pi vs Letta
- Emdash vs Letta
- Gemini CLI vs Letta
- GitHub Copilot CLI vs Letta
- goose vs Letta
- Harness² vs Letta
- HarnessRouter vs Letta
- Jules vs Letta
- Junie CLI vs Letta
- Kilo Code CLI vs Letta
- Kimi Code CLI vs Letta
- Kiro CLI vs Letta
- Letta vs mini-swe-agent
- Letta vs MiniMax Code
- Letta vs Mistral Vibe CLI
- Letta vs Muse Code
- Letta vs OpenAI Agents API
- Letta vs OpenAI Codex
- Letta vs OpenCode
- Letta vs OpenHands
- Letta vs OpenMausBot
- Letta vs Orca
- Letta vs Paseo
- Letta vs Prime Agent
- Letta vs Qoder CLI
- Letta vs Qwen Code
- Letta vs Mirror CLI
- Letta vs Rovo Dev CLI
- Letta vs Sculptor
- Letta vs T3 Code
- Letta vs Traycer
- Letta vs Unstoppable
- Letta vs Verdent
- Letta vs Vibe-Trading
- Letta vs Warp (Warp Agent CLI and the Oz Agent API)
- Clawboo vs dsh-superagent (DeepSeek)
- Clawboo vs Letta
- CLI Manager vs dsh-superagent (DeepSeek)
- CLI Manager vs Letta
- dsh-superagent (DeepSeek) vs Harness
- dsh-superagent (DeepSeek) vs Paperclip
- dsh-superagent (DeepSeek) vs Parallax
- Harness vs Letta
- Letta vs Paperclip
- Letta vs Parallax
Machine-readable
- This page as Markdown
/compare/deepseek-superagent-vs-letta.md· slim.min.md· JSON.json(or sendAccept: text/markdown) - Each listing in full
/api/v1/tools/deepseek-superagent.json·/api/v1/tools/letta.json - From a terminal
anchor compare deepseek-superagent letta(the CLI) - Over MCP
compare_tools {"a": "deepseek-superagent", "b": "letta"}at/mcp, no key