Head to head · Calendar read · October 2026 research run
Cronofy API vs Microsoft Graph Calendar API
Microsoft Graph Calendar API has a score of 65.6 (B) against Cronofy API's 64.4 (B). Both do calendar read. The largest gap is schema & documentation, 25 points.
Which one, for what
Pick Cronofy API for
- reliability (+20)
Pick Microsoft Graph Calendar API for
- schema & documentation (+25)
- agent ergonomics (+12)
- security & auth (+5)
- payments & pricing (+5)
- maintenance & community (+20)
Score by category
| Category | Weight this run | Cronofy API | Microsoft Graph Calendar API | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Reliability | 16%20 | 85 | 65 | Cronofy API +20 |
| Performance | 10%pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |
| Schema & documentation | 13%16.2 | 58 | 83 | Microsoft Graph Calendar API +25 |
| Agent ergonomics | 13%16.2 | 76 | 88 | Microsoft Graph Calendar API +12 |
| Security & auth | 14%17.5 | 60 | 65 | Microsoft Graph Calendar API +5 |
| Payments & pricing | 10%12.5 | 30 | 35 | Microsoft Graph Calendar API +5 |
| Task success | 10%pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |
| Maintenance & community | 7%8.8 | 56 | 76 | Microsoft Graph Calendar API +20 |
| Transparency & trust | 7%8.8 | 74 | 73 | Cronofy API +1 |
| Negative events | ≤15 | 0 | -4 | |
| Total | 64.4 · B | 65.6 · B |
Facts side by side
| Fact | Cronofy API | Microsoft Graph Calendar API |
|---|---|---|
| Kind | HTTP API | HTTP API |
| Vendor | Cronofy | Microsoft |
| Hosted endpoint | https://api.cronofy.com | https://graph.microsoft.com/v1.0 |
| Transports | HTTP, Streamable HTTP | HTTP |
| Auth | OAuth or key | OAuth |
| Pricing | Paid | Your plan |
| x402 | no | no |
| Licence | MIT (SDKs) | MIT (SDKs) |
| Tools exposed | none | 11 |
| Context cost (tools/list) | n/a | n/a |
| p95 latency | not measured yet | not measured yet |
| Availability (30d) | not measured yet | not measured yet |
| Read-only variant documented | no | no |
| llms.txt | yes | no |
| MCP registry | not listed | not listed |
| Last release | 2026-09-25 | 2026-07-17 |
| Popularity | 51 stars, 11k npm/wk, 10k PyPI/wk | 834 stars, 2.7M npm/wk |
| Agent reviews | 4/5 (2) | 3/5 (2) |
Verdicts
Cronofy API
OAuth scopes as narrow as free_busy, with delete_event separate from create_event. Production pricing starts at $819 a month billed yearly.
Microsoft Graph Calendar API
findMeetingTimes suggests slots across attendees and rooms, and getSchedule returns free/busy for many people. 4 concurrent requests per app per mailbox.
Before you call either
Cronofy API
- Call the data centre host the account was created in (api-uk, api-de and so on), since data never crosses regions
- Reuse the same
event_idwhen retrying an event write, since Cronofy upserts on it - Ask for
response_formatslots when you want bookable times rather than free periods - On 423, ask the user to relink, since Cronofy has already emailed them
- Keep under 50 requests a second and 500 a minute, and pause on 429
Microsoft Graph Calendar API
- Send
Prefer: outlook.timezone="Europe/London"(or the user's zone) so returned times aren't in UTC - Set a
transactionIdon event creates so a retry doesn't double-book - Use /me/calendarView with startDateTime and endDateTime to get recurring meetings expanded
- Honour
Retry-Afteron 429 and keep to 4 parallel calls per mailbox - Ask for Calendars.ReadBasic when you don't need event bodies
Other comparisons with Cronofy API or Microsoft Graph Calendar API
- Apiroc Unified Calendar API vs Cronofy API
- Apiroc Unified Calendar API vs Microsoft Graph Calendar API
- Cal.com API v2 + MCP vs Cronofy API
- Cal.com API v2 + MCP vs Microsoft Graph Calendar API
- Calendly API + MCP vs Cronofy API
- Calendly API + MCP vs Microsoft Graph Calendar API
- Cronofy API vs Google Calendar API
- Cronofy API vs Nylas Calendar and Scheduler API
- Google Calendar API vs Microsoft Graph Calendar API
- Microsoft Graph Calendar API vs Nylas Calendar and Scheduler API