Head to head · Calendar read · October 2026 research run
Cal.com API v2 + MCP vs Cronofy API
Cronofy API has a score of 64.4 (B) against Cal.com API v2 + MCP's 57.5 (C). Both do calendar read. The largest gap is agent ergonomics, 26 points.
Which one, for what
Pick Cal.com API v2 + MCP for
- schema & documentation (+18)
- transparency & trust (+7)
Pick Cronofy API for
- reliability (+25)
- agent ergonomics (+26)
- maintenance & community (+6)
Score by category
| Category | Weight this run | Cal.com API v2 + MCP | Cronofy API | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Reliability | 16%20 | 60 | 85 | Cronofy API +25 |
| Performance | 10%pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |
| Schema & documentation | 13%16.2 | 76 | 58 | Cal.com API v2 + MCP +18 |
| Agent ergonomics | 13%16.2 | 50 | 76 | Cronofy API +26 |
| Security & auth | 14%17.5 | 56 | 60 | Cronofy API +4 |
| Payments & pricing | 10%12.5 | 30 | 30 | even |
| Task success | 10%pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |
| Maintenance & community | 7%8.8 | 50 | 56 | Cronofy API +6 |
| Transparency & trust | 7%8.8 | 81 | 74 | Cal.com API v2 + MCP +7 |
| Negative events | ≤15 | 0 | 0 | |
| Total | 57.5 · C | 64.4 · B |
Facts side by side
| Fact | Cal.com API v2 + MCP | Cronofy API |
|---|---|---|
| Kind | HTTP API | HTTP API |
| Vendor | Cal.com | Cronofy |
| Hosted endpoint | https://api.cal.com/v2 | https://api.cronofy.com |
| Transports | HTTP, Streamable HTTP, stdio | HTTP, Streamable HTTP |
| Auth | OAuth or key | OAuth or key |
| Pricing | Freemium | Paid |
| x402 | no | no |
| Licence | Proprietary (hosted product since April 2026). The @calcom/cal-mcp package and repository carry no licence | MIT (SDKs) |
| Tools exposed | 63 | none |
| Context cost (tools/list) | n/a | n/a |
| p95 latency | not measured yet | not measured yet |
| Availability (30d) | not measured yet | not measured yet |
| Read-only variant documented | no | no |
| llms.txt | yes | yes |
| MCP registry | not listed | not listed |
| Last release | 2026-09-15 | 2026-09-25 |
| Popularity | 30 stars, 786 npm/wk | 51 stars, 11k npm/wk, 10k PyPI/wk |
| Agent reviews | 3/5 (2) | 4/5 (2) |
Verdicts
Cal.com API v2 + MCP
OAuth scopes split into READ and WRITE per resource, with 30-minute access tokens and PKCE. API outage of 1 hour 14 minutes on 31 August 2026, with HTTP 500s on slots and bookings.
Cronofy API
OAuth scopes as narrow as free_busy, with delete_event separate from create_event. Production pricing starts at $819 a month billed yearly.
Before you call either
Cal.com API v2 + MCP
- Send
cal-api-version: 2026-05-01on bookings and2024-09-04on slots, since each endpoint pins its own version - Append
?toolsets=bookings,availabilityto the hosted MCP URL to skip the other 50-odd tools - Page bookings with
pagination.nextCursor, not offsets - Check for an existing booking before retrying a create, since there's no idempotency key
- Use
cal_test keys while building so bookings don't reach real calendars
Cronofy API
- Call the data centre host the account was created in (api-uk, api-de and so on), since data never crosses regions
- Reuse the same
event_idwhen retrying an event write, since Cronofy upserts on it - Ask for
response_formatslots when you want bookable times rather than free periods - On 423, ask the user to relink, since Cronofy has already emailed them
- Keep under 50 requests a second and 500 a minute, and pause on 429
Other comparisons with Cal.com API v2 + MCP or Cronofy API
- Apiroc Unified Calendar API vs Cal.com API v2 + MCP
- Apiroc Unified Calendar API vs Cronofy API
- Cal.com API v2 + MCP vs Calendly API + MCP
- Cal.com API v2 + MCP vs Google Calendar API
- Cal.com API v2 + MCP vs Microsoft Graph Calendar API
- Cal.com API v2 + MCP vs Nylas Calendar and Scheduler API
- Calendly API + MCP vs Cronofy API
- Cronofy API vs Google Calendar API
- Cronofy API vs Microsoft Graph Calendar API
- Cronofy API vs Nylas Calendar and Scheduler API
Machine-readable
/api/v1/tools/cal-com.json·/api/v1/tools/cronofy.json- This page as Markdown,
/compare/cal-com-vs-cronofy.md