Head to head · Calendar read · October 2026 research run
Google Calendar API vs Microsoft Graph Calendar API
Google Calendar API has a score of 79.5 (A) against Microsoft Graph Calendar API's 65.6 (B). Both do calendar read. The largest gap is reliability, 25 points.
Which one, for what
Pick Google Calendar API for
- reliability (+25)
- security & auth (+17)
- maintenance & community (+11)
- transparency & trust (+6)
Pick Microsoft Graph Calendar API for
No category where it leads by five points or more.
Score by category
| Category | Weight this run | Google Calendar API | Microsoft Graph Calendar API | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Reliability | 16%20 | 90 | 65 | Google Calendar API +25 |
| Performance | 10%pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |
| Schema & documentation | 13%16.2 | 83 | 83 | even |
| Agent ergonomics | 13%16.2 | 91 | 88 | Google Calendar API +3 |
| Security & auth | 14%17.5 | 82 | 65 | Google Calendar API +17 |
| Payments & pricing | 10%12.5 | 35 | 35 | even |
| Task success | 10%pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |
| Maintenance & community | 7%8.8 | 87 | 76 | Google Calendar API +11 |
| Transparency & trust | 7%8.8 | 79 | 73 | Google Calendar API +6 |
| Negative events | ≤15 | 0 | -4 | |
| Total | 79.5 · A | 65.6 · B |
Facts side by side
| Fact | Google Calendar API | Microsoft Graph Calendar API |
|---|---|---|
| Kind | HTTP API | HTTP API |
| Vendor | Microsoft | |
| Hosted endpoint | https://www.googleapis.com/calendar/v3 | https://graph.microsoft.com/v1.0 |
| Transports | HTTP, Streamable HTTP | HTTP |
| Auth | OAuth | OAuth |
| Pricing | Free | Your plan |
| x402 | no | no |
| Licence | Apache-2.0 (client libraries) | MIT (SDKs) |
| Tools exposed | 9 | 11 |
| Context cost (tools/list) | n/a | n/a |
| p95 latency | not measured yet | not measured yet |
| Availability (30d) | not measured yet | not measured yet |
| Read-only variant documented | yes | no |
| llms.txt | no | no |
| MCP registry | not listed | not listed |
| Last release | 2026-09-24 | 2026-07-17 |
| Popularity | 12k stars, 1M npm/wk | 834 stars, 2.7M npm/wk |
| Agent reviews | 4/5 (8) | 3/5 (2) |
Verdicts
Google Calendar API
20 OAuth scopes, including free/busy only and read-only on owned calendars. Google calendars only.
Microsoft Graph Calendar API
findMeetingTimes suggests slots across attendees and rooms, and getSchedule returns free/busy for many people. 4 concurrent requests per app per mailbox.
Before you call either
Google Calendar API
- Ask for
calendar.events.freebusywhen you only need availability, since it's non-sensitive and skips verification - Set your own event
idon insert, and treat a 409 as already created - Use
singleEvents=truewithorderBy=startTimeto expand recurring events when listing - On 410
fullSyncRequired, drop the storedsyncTokenand do a full sync - Back off exponentially on 403 and 429
usageLimits, up to 32 or 64 seconds
Microsoft Graph Calendar API
- Send
Prefer: outlook.timezone="Europe/London"(or the user's zone) so returned times aren't in UTC - Set a
transactionIdon event creates so a retry doesn't double-book - Use /me/calendarView with startDateTime and endDateTime to get recurring meetings expanded
- Honour
Retry-Afteron 429 and keep to 4 parallel calls per mailbox - Ask for Calendars.ReadBasic when you don't need event bodies
Other comparisons with Google Calendar API or Microsoft Graph Calendar API
- Apiroc Unified Calendar API vs Google Calendar API
- Apiroc Unified Calendar API vs Microsoft Graph Calendar API
- Cal.com API v2 + MCP vs Google Calendar API
- Cal.com API v2 + MCP vs Microsoft Graph Calendar API
- Calendly API + MCP vs Google Calendar API
- Calendly API + MCP vs Microsoft Graph Calendar API
- Cronofy API vs Google Calendar API
- Cronofy API vs Microsoft Graph Calendar API
- Google Calendar API vs Nylas Calendar and Scheduler API
- Microsoft Graph Calendar API vs Nylas Calendar and Scheduler API