Head to head · CRM records · October 2026 research run
Affinity vs SugarAI (SugarCRM)
Affinity scores 63.4 (B) on agent readiness against SugarAI (SugarCRM)'s 49.5 (D), and leads in 4 of 7 scored categories. Both do crm records.
Best CRM and customer-platform tools for AI agents · All 136 crm comparisons
Which one, for what
Affinity B
Good for Venture capital, private equity and other private capital firms that already run Affinity and want an agent to read relationship strength, pipeline lists, notes and meetings, then update fields and log notes.
Ahead on
- Schema & documentation, 91 against 48
- Security & auth, 66 against 51
- Maintenance & community, 70 against 22
Also in its favour
- A hosted endpoint, with nothing to install
- Runs on your own machine
Watch for
No self-serve access. Every plan button reads Contact sales, the Essential plan has no API, and trial accounts can't call the API
Good for Companies already running Sugar Sell, Serve or Enterprise that want an agent to read and write records under a named user's roles, and that have Sugar's approval for the integration.
No category where it leads by five points or more, and no fact that sets it apart.
Watch for
The AI Supplemental Terms forbid connecting customer-owned or third-party AI systems, agents or MCP connectors to the Services or APIs except through functionality Sugar has approved. This matters before any probe is run
Score by category
| Category | Weight this run | Affinity | SugarAI (SugarCRM) | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Reliability | 16%20 | 64 | 61 | Affinity +3 |
| Performance | 10%pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |
| Schema & documentation | 13%16.2 | 91 | 48 | Affinity +43 |
| Agent ergonomics | 13%16.2 | 66 | 69 | SugarAI (SugarCRM) +3 |
| Security & auth | 14%17.5 | 66 | 51 | Affinity +15 |
| Payments & pricing | 10%12.5 | 10 | 10 | even |
| Task success | 10%pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |
| Maintenance & community | 7%8.8 | 70 | 22 | Affinity +48 |
| Transparency & trust | 7%8.8 | 70 | 71 | SugarAI (SugarCRM) +1 |
| Negative events | ≤15 | 0 | 0 | |
| Total | 63.4 · B | 49.5 · D |
Facts side by side
| Fact | Affinity | SugarAI (SugarCRM) |
|---|---|---|
| Kind | HTTP API | HTTP API |
| Vendor | Project Affinity, Inc. | SugarAI Software Inc. |
| Hosted endpoint | https://api.affinity.co/v2 | no (local only) |
| Transports | HTTP, Streamable HTTP, stdio | HTTP |
| Auth | OAuth or key | OAuth |
| Pricing | Paid | Paid |
| x402 | no | no |
| Licence | Proprietary service under Affinity's master subscription agreement. The affinity-mcp package on PyPI is MIT | Proprietary service under the SugarAI Customer Terms of Service |
| Tools exposed | 75 | none |
| Read-only variant documented | yes | no |
| llms.txt | yes | no |
| Last release | 2026-10-02 | none |
| Terms last updated | ||
| Privacy policy last updated | 2026-07-01 | no date given |
| Customer content may train models | ||
| Terms restrict automated access | ||
| Terms restrict benchmarking | ||
| Terms or service can change without notice | ||
| Arbitration or class-action waiver | ||
| Popularity | 268 PyPI/wk | none |
Verdicts
Affinity
A public OpenAPI 3.1 file, dated API versions with migration notes and a hosted MCP server with a read-only OAuth scope give an agent a well-documented way in. Access needs a Scale plan at $2,300 a user a year, sold through sales, with no trial that includes the API, and 36 of the 112 v2 operations are marked beta.
SugarAI (SugarCRM)
The REST reference covers 350 endpoint pages with filters, field selection, bulk calls and upsert by sync_key. SugarAI's AI Supplemental Terms forbid connecting a customer's or third party's AI agent or MCP connector to the APIs unless Sugar has approved it, tokens carry no scopes, and no OpenAPI file, trial or SLA was found.
Before you call either
Affinity
- Send
X-Affinity-Api-Version: 2026-09-17on every request, or the key's default version applies. Unauthenticated calls answered as 2024-01-01 when we checked - Read
x-ratelimit-limit-user-remainingandx-ratelimit-limit-org-remainingon each response. The limits are 900 calls a minute per user and, below Enterprise, 100,000 a month per account, shared by v1, v2 and MCP - Follow
pagination.nextUrlfor the next page, and passfieldIdsorfieldTypesso list calls return only the fields needed - Check for duplicates before a create. There are no idempotency keys, so a retried POST can make a second record
- For MCP, untick the write scope at OAuth consent when the task only reads. Treat note, transcript and file text as untrusted input
SugarAI (SugarCRM)
- Confirm that Sugar has approved the agent integration before connecting. The AI Supplemental Terms forbid unapproved AI agents and MCP connectors on the APIs
- POST to
/rest/v11_27/oauth2/tokenwithgrant_typepasswordand aplatformother thanbase,mobileorportal, or the login can end the user's own session - Send the access token in the
OAuth-Tokenheader. It lasts 60 minutes by default, so store the refresh token and not the password - Stay under 20 requests a second on SugarCloud and reuse one session for batches. Over-limit traffic is blocked by IP address until support lifts it
- Page with
max_numandoffsetuntilnext_offsetis -1, and passfieldsto keep responses small - Use
PATCH /integrate/:module/:sync_key_field_name/:sync_key_field_valuefor writes that may be retried, since it inserts or updates bysync_key
Questions
Which is better for AI agents, Affinity or SugarAI (SugarCRM)?
Affinity scores 63.4 (B) on agent readiness against SugarAI (SugarCRM)'s 49.5 (D), and leads in 4 of 7 scored categories.
Do Affinity and SugarAI (SugarCRM) need an API key?
Affinity takes an API key or an OAuth sign-in. SugarAI (SugarCRM) uses an OAuth sign-in.
Can an agent call Affinity and SugarAI (SugarCRM) without installing anything?
Affinity has a hosted endpoint at https://api.affinity.co/v2. No hosted endpoint is listed for SugarAI (SugarCRM).
Other comparisons with Affinity or SugarAI (SugarCRM)
- Affinity vs Attio API + MCP
- Affinity vs Capsule CRM
- Affinity vs Close API + MCP
- Affinity vs Copper API
- Affinity vs Microsoft Dynamics 365 Sales
- Affinity vs folk API + MCP
- Affinity vs Freshsales API
- Affinity vs HubSpot API + MCP
- Affinity vs Nutshell
- Affinity vs Pipedrive API + MCP
- Affinity vs Salesflare
- Affinity vs Salesforce API + MCP
- Affinity vs Streak API + MCP
- Affinity vs Twenty API + MCP
- Affinity vs Zoho CRM
- Attio API + MCP vs SugarAI (SugarCRM)
- Capsule CRM vs SugarAI (SugarCRM)
- Close API + MCP vs SugarAI (SugarCRM)
- Copper API vs SugarAI (SugarCRM)
- Microsoft Dynamics 365 Sales vs SugarAI (SugarCRM)
- folk API + MCP vs SugarAI (SugarCRM)
- Freshsales API vs SugarAI (SugarCRM)
- HubSpot API + MCP vs SugarAI (SugarCRM)
- Nutshell vs SugarAI (SugarCRM)
- Pipedrive API + MCP vs SugarAI (SugarCRM)
- Salesflare vs SugarAI (SugarCRM)
- Salesforce API + MCP vs SugarAI (SugarCRM)
- Streak API + MCP vs SugarAI (SugarCRM)
- SugarAI (SugarCRM) vs Twenty API + MCP
- SugarAI (SugarCRM) vs Zoho CRM
Machine-readable
- This page as Markdown
/compare/affinity-vs-sugarcrm.md· slim.min.md· JSON.json(or sendAccept: text/markdown) - Each listing in full
/api/v1/tools/affinity.json·/api/v1/tools/sugarcrm.json - From a terminal
anchor compare affinity sugarcrm(the CLI) - Over MCP
compare_tools {"a": "affinity", "b": "sugarcrm"}at/mcp, no key