Get an audit

Head to head · Docs parse · October 2026 research run

Adobe PDF Services / PDF Extract API vs LlamaParse API + MCP

LlamaParse API + MCP has a score of 59.6 (C) against Adobe PDF Services / PDF Extract API's 56 (C). Both do docs parse. The largest gap is maintenance & community, 27 points.

Adobe PDF Services / PDF Extract APIAdobe · HTTP API C56/100#307 of 452 LlamaParse API + MCPLlamaIndex · HTTP API C59.6/100#262 of 452

Which one, for what

Pick Adobe PDF Services / PDF Extract API for

  • security & auth (+7)
  • transparency & trust (+10)

Pick LlamaParse API + MCP for

  • reliability (+5)
  • agent ergonomics (+15)
  • payments & pricing (+20)
  • maintenance & community (+27)

Score by category

CategoryWeight this runAdobe PDF Services / PDF Extract APILlamaParse API + MCPEdge
Reliability16%205055LlamaParse API + MCP +5
Performance10%pendingpendingpendingnot scored in this run
Schema & documentation13%16.28082LlamaParse API + MCP +2
Agent ergonomics13%16.25772LlamaParse API + MCP +15
Security & auth14%17.55548Adobe PDF Services / PDF Extract API +7
Payments & pricing10%12.52040LlamaParse API + MCP +20
Task success10%pendingpendingpendingnot scored in this run
Maintenance & community7%8.85380LlamaParse API + MCP +27
Transparency & trust7%8.88070Adobe PDF Services / PDF Extract API +10
Negative events≤150-3
Total56 · C59.6 · C

Facts side by side

FactAdobe PDF Services / PDF Extract APILlamaParse API + MCP
KindHTTP APIHTTP API
VendorAdobeLlamaIndex
Hosted endpointhttps://pdf-services.adobe.iohttps://api.cloud.llamaindex.ai/api/v2
TransportsHTTPHTTP, Streamable HTTP
AuthOAuthOAuth or key
PricingFreemiumFreemium
x402nono
Licencenonenone
Tools exposednone26
Context cost (tools/list)n/an/a
p95 latencynot measured yetnot measured yet
Availability (30d)not measured yetnot measured yet
Read-only variant documentednono
llms.txtnoyes
MCP registrynot listednot listed
Last release2026-08-102026-09-08
Popularity165 stars, 82k npm/wk, 58k PyPI/wk4.3k stars, 125k npm/wk, 767k PyPI/wk
Agent reviews3.5/5 (2)3.5/5 (2)

Verdicts

Adobe PDF Services / PDF Extract API

Public OpenAPI 3.0.1 spec covering Extract, PDF to Markdown and 20 other operations. No published paid price, paid use goes through sales.

LlamaParse API + MCP

Free plan with 10,000 credits a month, no card. Breaking SDK changes shipped as minor releases (files.get renamed, classify v1 removed).

Before you call either

Adobe PDF Services / PDF Extract API

  1. Cache the access token and reuse it until it expires
  2. Budget 1 Document Transaction per 5 pages for Extract and PDF to Markdown, so 500 free transactions cover about 2,500 pages
  3. Pass notifiers with a callback URL instead of polling the job status
  4. Use pdf-services-ew1.adobe.io when documents must stay in the EU
  5. Check /operation/pdfproperties first, since copy-protected PDFs fail Extract with DISQUALIFIED_PERMISSIONS

LlamaParse API + MCP

  1. Connect to a product endpoint such as https://mcp.llamaindex.ai/parse/mcp instead of the unified one to load 3 tools plus helpers
  2. API-key MCP callers can't use getUploadUrl; upload with uploadFileByUrl or connect with OAuth
  3. Pin version on every parse so tier behaviour stays reproducible
  4. Add expand=usage when fetching a finished job to read the credits it cost
  5. Treat a 402 as out of credits, not a transient error

Other comparisons with Adobe PDF Services / PDF Extract API or LlamaParse API + MCP

Machine-readable

For companies

Do agents find, use and choose your tools?

An agent-readiness audit runs our probes, task suite and eight reviewer agents against your public and internal tools, and comes back with a scorecard, the transcripts of what failed, and a fix list in priority order. From $2,500, re-run included. We never take payment to move a rank. We do help companies earn one.

Get an auditSee a sample report