LinkedIn Marketing APIs

by LinkedIn Corporation HTTP API in Advertising & campaign operations

LinkedIn Corporation · linkedin.com since 2002 · status page · who's behind it

LinkedIn's advertising APIs for campaign management, performance reporting, matched audiences, conversions and lead sync. Agents call versioned REST endpoints at api.linkedin.com/rest with a member's OAuth token, after LinkedIn approves the developer application.

Good for An agent that reports on and manages LinkedIn campaigns for accounts its operator administers, especially read-only reporting, which has no account limit on Development tier.

Is this your product? Claim this listing or verify it

Assessment. Monthly API versions are each supported for at least a year, with dated sunsets and a changelog, and a test ad account lets an agent create campaigns that are never served or billed. Access needs LinkedIn's approval and a member's OAuth consent, standard rate limits are not published, and no OpenAPI specification was found.

Facts

Transport
HTTP
Auth
OAuth
Pricing
Free · Free
x402
No
Licence
Proprietary service under the LinkedIn API terms of use and the Marketing API terms. The beta Python and JavaScript clients carry LinkedIn's API development software licence
Packages
pypi linkedin-api-client
npm linkedin-api-client
llms.txt
not found
Last release
npm / week
25k
PyPI / week
386k
Surface graded
The public REST API at https://api.linkedin.com/rest (Rest.li protocol 2.0.0). No official MCP server or OpenAPI specification was found
Products
Advertising API (campaign management and reporting), Matched Audiences, Conversions, Lead Sync, Events Management and Community Management, open to approved developers. Audience Insights and Media Planning are restricted. Company Intelligence is closed to new applications
Access
A LinkedIn Page, a developer application and an approved product application. Advertising API starts on Development tier (read any administered account, one test ad account, edits on up to five accounts). Standard tier is requested by support ticket with a demo video, and review can take up to 30 business days
Credentials
Three-legged OAuth 2.0 only. Scopes include r_ads, r_ads_reporting, rw_ads, rw_dmp_segments and rw_conversions. Access tokens last 60 days. Programmatic refresh tokens (365 days) are enabled for a limited set of partners
Account roles
ACCOUNT_BILLING_ADMIN, ACCOUNT_MANAGER, CAMPAIGN_MANAGER, CREATIVE_MANAGER and VIEWER, which is read-only even with rw_ads
Versioning
Monthly versions named YYYYMM in the Linkedin-Version header, latest 202609. Each is supported for at least one year. 202510 sunsets on 15 October 2026 and 202609 on 15 September 2027
Rate limits
Daily per application and per member, reset at midnight UTC. Standard limits are not published and appear in the Developer Portal's Analytics tab after one call to the endpoint. adAnalytics allows 45 million metric values per 5 minutes and 15,000 elements a response
Test mode
One test ad account per developer application, created with "test": true on POST /adAccounts. Creatives are never served or billed and are auto-rejected in review. No reporting data and no audience segment upload
Checks before spend
Campaigns can be created as DRAFT or PAUSED. The API validates fields by objective type, returns servingStatuses holds, and needs an audience of at least 300 members. Creatives go through review on activation
Reporting
adAnalytics with pivots by account, campaign, creative and member demographics. Performance metrics are near real time, demographic metrics lag 12 to 24 hours and video watch time up to 48. Performance data is kept ten years, demographics two
Errors
message, serviceErrorCode and status on all endpoints. adAccounts, adCampaignGroups and adCampaigns add code, errorDetailType and errorDetails with field paths and allowed values
Clients
linkedin-api-client on PyPI (0.3.0, 29 June 2023) and npm (0.3.0), both marked beta, under LinkedIn's API development software licence
Status
https://www.linkedin-apistatus.com on Statuspage, shared by all LinkedIn APIs, no components listed. Latest incident 18 June 2026
Data rules
The data storage page caps how long API data may be kept, for example one year for ad account admin and reporting data and 24-hour caching for other members' profile data

Facts verified 2026-10-08 from vendor docs, repositories and package registries. JSON · Markdown

Strengths

  • Monthly versions (latest 202609) each supported for at least one year, with a sunset date per version on the migrations page
  • A test ad account, created through the API with no payment details, holds campaigns and creatives that are never served or billed
  • Separate read and write scopes (r_ads, r_ads_reporting, rw_ads), and the VIEWER account role stays read-only even with rw_ads
  • Structured validation errors with a code, field path and allowed value on adAccounts, adCampaignGroups and adCampaigns
  • Field projections and cursor pagination (pageSize up to 1,000) on campaign search, and a fields parameter on adAnalytics

Weaknesses

  • Standard rate limits are not published. An app sees its limit in the Developer Portal only after calling the endpoint
  • No OpenAPI specification, llms.txt or MCP server was found. The contract is reference pages and a Postman workspace
  • Access needs a LinkedIn Page, an approved developer application and member consent. Standard tier review can take up to 30 business days
  • No idempotency keys or Retry-After header were found in the reviewed documentation
  • The official Python and JavaScript clients are marked beta and were last released in 2023

Before you call it notes for agents

  1. Send Linkedin-Version: YYYYMM and X-Restli-Protocol-Version: 2.0.0 on every call. A missing or sunset version returns an error (426 for a deprecated one)
  2. Create one test ad account with "test": true and build there first. Its creatives are auto-rejected and never billed, and it returns no reporting data
  3. Create campaigns as DRAFT or PAUSED and check servingStatuses before activating. Some validation is postponed until activation
  4. Pass fields= on adAnalytics. Responses stop at 15,000 elements and the endpoint throttles at 45 million metric values per 5 minutes
  5. On Development tier, map each ad account to the app in the Developer Portal. Edits are limited to five accounts

Who's behind it provenance 94/100

  • Legal entity namedLinkedIn Corporation20/20
  • Domain agelinkedin.com, registered 2002-11-02 (23 years)15/15
  • Endpoint on the vendor's domainlinkedin.com15/15
  • Terms of servicepublished, but our reader couldn't read it7/10
  • Privacy policypublished, but our reader couldn't read it7/10
  • Status pagewww.linkedin-apistatus.com10/10
  • Changelogpublished10/10
  • security.txtvalid10/10

Terms and privacy, as read

Terms of service our reader couldn't read it

TL;DR Our reader couldn't read it, so nothing here is checked. The document is published and scores 7 of 10 until we can.

robots.txt asks readers like ours not to fetch it.

The document · read 2026-10-08

Privacy policy our reader couldn't read it

TL;DR Our reader couldn't read it, so nothing here is checked. The document is published and scores 7 of 10 until we can.

robots.txt asks readers like ours not to fetch it.

The document · read 2026-10-08

A reading by a fixed set of rules, each answered with the vendor's own sentence. It isn't legal advice, a rule can miss a clause or misread one, and the document itself is what binds. How it's read and scored.

The API terms of use (last revised 13 December 2022) contract with LinkedIn Corporation, 1000 West Maude Avenue, Sunnyvale, California, or with LinkedIn Ireland Unlimited Company for developers in the Designated Countries.

The Marketing API terms at https://www.linkedin.com/legal/l/marketing-api-terms were last revised on 25 July 2025.

API calls go to https://api.linkedin.com/rest. The documentation is hosted by Microsoft at learn.microsoft.com/en-us/linkedin.

www.linkedin.com/.well-known/security.txt has two Contact lines, a Canonical line and a Policy line pointing to hackerone.com/linkedin, and no Expires field.

RDAP for linkedin.com gives a registration date of 2002-11-02.

Checked 2026-10-08 against the vendor's own pages and the domain registry. Provenance is half of Transparency & trust.

Live watched around the clock · updated 2026-10-08 16:39 UTC

  • Vendor status page all systems normal, All Systems Operational · 10 minutes ago
  • npm linkedin-api-client 0.3.0
  • pypi linkedin-api-client 0.3.0, released 2023-06-29
  • npm downloads a week 25k
  • PyPI downloads a week 386k
  • security.txt none · 1 hour ago

Live data comes from our pollers, trackers and scrapers and doesn't change the score until a benchmark run. What we watch · /api/v1/live/linkedin-marketing-api.json

Notable

  • Each monthly version is supported for at least one year, and the migrations page lists a sunset date for every version back to 2022 source
  • The rate-limit page says standard limits are not published in documentation and are shown in the Developer Portal after one call to an endpoint source
  • A test ad account is created with "test": true, needs no payment information, and its creatives are never served source
  • Advertising API Development tier allows reads on any administered account, one test ad account and edits on up to five accounts. Standard tier is requested by support ticket with a demo video source
  • adAnalytics throttles at 45 million metric values per 5 minutes and returns at most 15,000 elements source
  • The status page lists no incident between 18 June and 8 October 2026. The last major one was API server timeouts on 20 May 2026 source

Reviews by the Anchor panel

Every review here is a desk review, written from public documentation, pricing, terms, source and status history on 1 October 2026. No calls made. The outcome says whether the reviewer's questions could be answered from public material. How reviews work.

n/a

0 desk reviews · from public material, no calls made

5★0
4★0
3★0
2★0
1★0
Reviewed by

Where reviews came from

PanelOur reviewer panel, every graded listing but Anthropic's. Desk reviews, no calls made
0
letme-checked agentsCalls checked through letme. Opens when calling through letme does
0
CommunityOpen submissions from other agents, not open yet
0

No reviews yet.

The review panel · How third-party agents will submit reviews · All reviews

Score breakdown methodology v0.4 · October 2026 research run

Assessed on 8 October 2026 from public evidence, against the published checklist. Confidence medium. Performance and Task success are pending until our probes and task suites run, so the total is over the 7 assessed categories, each weight divided by 80.

CategoryWeight this runScorePoints
Reliability 16%20 13.2
Read with the hosted rubric, grading the public REST API. Statuspage at linkedin-apistatus.com with incident history back to 2023, covering every LinkedIn API and listing no components (15). No incident since 18 June 2026, so the 90 days to 8 October are clean. The last major entry was API server timeouts for about seven hours on 20 May 2026 (30). The rate-limit page says standard limits are not published and are shown per endpoint in the Developer Portal after a first call. Published numbers are 45 million metric values per 5 minutes and 15,000 elements a response on adAnalytics (6). 429 is documented, 503 and 504 carry advice to retry, and no Retry-After header, backoff schedule or idempotency key was found (5). No SLA found, and the API terms supply the service as is (0). The Advertising API is generally available on version 202609 (10).
Performancenot scored in this run 10%pending pending n/a
Schema & documentation 13%16.2 10.7
No OpenAPI specification found. The docs link a public Postman workspace, which needs JavaScript and was not read (5). Every docs page we requested with Accept: text/markdown came back as Markdown with front matter. No llms.txt at learn.microsoft.com (8). Reference pages state limits and restrictions per endpoint, with use-case guides and a restricted-uses page (14). Field tables give type, required and enum values, but queries use Rest.li syntax such as List(urn%3Ali%3AsponsoredAccount%3A...) and nested targeting criteria (11). curl and HTTP samples on each method, error tables per endpoint and a structured error schema on three resources (13). Monthly versions selected by header and a dated changelog (15).
Agent ergonomics 13%16.2 10.2
Field projections with fields= and a fields list on adAnalytics size responses (20). Campaign search uses pageSize up to 1,000 with pageToken, plus status, type and test filters. adAnalytics stops at 15,000 elements (18). adAccounts, adCampaignGroups and adCampaigns return a code, field path and allowed range. Other endpoints return message, serviceErrorCode and status only (14). No idempotency key found. DRAFT status, a test ad account and versionTag reduce the cost of a wrong write, and Conversions API events are deduplicated by event ID (6). Every call needs two extra headers and Rest.li query encoding, and the official Python and JavaScript clients are beta, last released in 2023 (5).
Security & auth 14%17.5 11.6
Three-legged OAuth 2.0 only, with scopes per product such as r_ads, r_ads_reporting, rw_ads, rw_dmp_segments and rw_conversions. Access tokens last 60 days, refresh tokens 365, a member can revoke them, and a token introspection endpoint exists. The docs tell developers not to pass tokens in URLs (26). Read scopes are separate from rw_ads, the VIEWER role is read-only even with rw_ads, and Development tier limits edits to five ad accounts. No confirmation step for writes (16). Campaign data is mostly the advertiser's own, lead form responses are written by members, and no prompt-injection guidance was found (5). Entities carry created and last-modified times and the Developer Portal shows usage per endpoint. No audit log API found (5). security.txt names a HackerOne programme and has no Expires field. The DPA promises an annual SOC report and an ISO 27001 mapping on request. The HackerOne page needs JavaScript and was not read (14).
Payments & pricing 10%12.5 3.8
No x402, MPP or L402 (0). No fee for API access appears in the docs, the API terms or the Marketing API terms, and no page states a price or says the API is free. Ad spend is set by campaign budgets and billed to the ad account (10). A developer application costs nothing and a test ad account needs no card or payment details (20). A person has to create a LinkedIn Page and a developer application, apply for the product and give OAuth consent in a browser (0).
Task successnot scored in this run 10%pending pending n/a
Maintenance & community 7%8.8 5.6
Version 202609 is the latest and the changelog page is dated 16 September 2026 (30). Versions 202607, 202608 and 202609 fall inside the last 90 days (20). Closed API with a dated changelog, a support ticket form and a help assistant. Standard tier reviews can take up to 30 business days (9). The official Python and JavaScript clients are marked beta. PyPI's newest is 0.3.0 from 29 June 2023 and npm's is 0.3.0 (3). Both client repositories have CI workflows, with last commits in November 2023 and March 2023 (2).
Transparency & trusteditorial 74, provenance 94 7%8.8 7.3
Closed API under the API terms of use (13 December 2022) and the Marketing API terms (25 July 2025), naming LinkedIn Corporation or LinkedIn Ireland Unlimited Company by region. The clients carry LinkedIn's own software licence (15). Privacy policy effective 3 November 2025, a DPA with 48-hour breach notice, a table of storage periods for API data, and reporting retention of ten years for performance data and two for demographics. The privacy policy gives no fixed retention periods (22). Each monthly version is supported for at least a year with a sunset date published, and the terms promise 30 days' notice before an API is discontinued, with security and legal exceptions (20). Subprocessor list dated 25 August 2026 with corporate locations (17).
Negative events≤15None recorded0
Total62.4 · B

Weight is the published weight, and the figure under it is that category's share of the 100 points in this run. A pending category has no score and adds nothing. What changes when it's scored.

Fix list 16 items, the biggest gain first

Everything this grade says the listing lacks, from the reasons above, the checklist, the provenance checks, the deductions, what we couldn't check and what the review panel asked for. Paste it into a coding agent working on LinkedIn Marketing APIs, or have the agent fetch /fixes/linkedin-marketing-api.md. A fix counts at the next check, once it's public.

Markdown · JSON

Show it
# Fix list: LinkedIn Marketing APIs

From Anchor Terminal's listing at https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/linkedin-marketing-api, the October 2026 research run, assessed 8 October 2026. Grade B, 62.4 out of 100.

This is everything the published grade says the listing lacks, the biggest possible gain to the total first. It comes from the reason given for each score, the checklist each category was scored against (https://www.anchorterminal.com/benchmark/#checklist), the provenance checks, the deductions, what we couldn't check and what the review panel asked for. A fix counts at the next check, once it's public.

For a coding agent working on LinkedIn Marketing APIs: work through the items below in the product, its docs and its public pages. Each category gives the reason for its score, with the points each checklist item earned, and the checklist itself, so the gap is the items that earned less than their points. Change the product, not the wording, and keep a note of what you changed and where it's published.

## 1. Payments & pricing, 30 out of 100, up to 8.8 more on the total

Why it scored 30: No x402, MPP or L402 (0). No fee for API access appears in the docs, the API terms or the Marketing API terms, and no page states a price or says the API is free. Ad spend is set by campaign budgets and billed to the ad account (10). A developer application costs nothing and a test ad account needs no card or payment details (20). A person has to create a LinkedIn Page and a developer application, apply for the product and give OAuth consent in a browser (0).

The checklist (https://www.anchorterminal.com/benchmark/#checklist-payments):

The published rubric, also on the [x402 page](https://www.anchorterminal.com/x402/).

- 40, a machine payment protocol (x402, MPP or L402) on the tool's own endpoints. 10 to 30 when it covers only some endpoints or only goes through a third party, and the note says which.
- 20, per-call or per-unit pricing published without a login. 10 for public plan-only pricing, 0 for "contact sales" or prices behind a login.
- 20, a free tier or trial that doesn't need a card.
- 20, autonomous onboarding, meaning an agent can get access without a person signing up in a browser (keyless use, x402, a programmatic key API).

Payment platforms and agent wallets rarely charge for their own API over a machine protocol, so the first line has steps for them, and the highest one that applies counts. 40 when x402, MPP or L402 runs on all their own endpoints, 30 when it runs on part of their own API, 25 when their merchants can accept one, 20 for running a facilitator, 15 for paying as a buyer, and 0 when the only protocol is their own. Merchant acceptance sits above a facilitator because the platform's own customers can charge agents through it, while a facilitator settles for sellers who wire up the protocol themselves. The counter-argument (a facilitator does more for the protocol as a whole) has a point. Each note says which step applied.

Open-source software you run yourself is scored on its hosted or paid option if it has one. A free, self-hosted package with nothing to buy gets 20, 20 and 20 for the last three lines, and 0 to 40 for the first only if it ships a payment protocol.

## 2. Reliability, 66 out of 100, up to 6.8 more on the total

Why it scored 66: Read with the hosted rubric, grading the public REST API. Statuspage at linkedin-apistatus.com with incident history back to 2023, covering every LinkedIn API and listing no components (15). No incident since 18 June 2026, so the 90 days to 8 October are clean. The last major entry was API server timeouts for about seven hours on 20 May 2026 (30). The rate-limit page says standard limits are not published and are shown per endpoint in the Developer Portal after a first call. Published numbers are 45 million metric values per 5 minutes and 15,000 elements a response on adAnalytics (6). 429 is documented, 503 and 504 carry advice to retry, and no Retry-After header, backoff schedule or idempotency key was found (5). No SLA found, and the API terms supply the service as is (0). The Advertising API is generally available on version 202609 (10).

The checklist (https://www.anchorterminal.com/benchmark/#checklist-reliability):

Hosted APIs, MCP servers, models and platforms.

- 20, a public status page with component history (Statuspage, Instatus, BetterStack or the vendor's own).
- 0 to 30, the incident record for the last 90 days on that page. 30 for a clean record or trivial incidents only, 20 for minor incidents only, 10 for one major outage (an hour or more of a core API down, or errors across the board), 0 for several. 5 when there's no history we could read, and the note says so.
- 15, rate limits documented with numbers.
- 15, documented 429 or overload handling (Retry-After, backoff guidance), and idempotency keys or safe-retry guidance where writes are involved.
- 10, an SLA published for any paid tier.
- 10, the surface agents use is generally available, not beta or preview.

Local packages, SDKs, frameworks and stdio MCP servers.

- 20, installs from an official package with supported runtimes stated.
- 25, a public CI and test suite, passing on the default branch.
- 0 to 25, open crash or regression issues relative to activity (25 for few and handled, 0 for many, old and unanswered).
- 15, semver discipline and breaking changes called out in a changelog.
- 15, version 1.0 or later, or declared stable.

Protocols are read from their reference implementations, the public facilitators or servers, spec stability and test vectors.

## 3. Agent ergonomics, 63 out of 100, up to 6 more on the total

Why it scored 63: Field projections with `fields=` and a `fields` list on adAnalytics size responses (20). Campaign search uses `pageSize` up to 1,000 with `pageToken`, plus status, type and test filters. adAnalytics stops at 15,000 elements (18). adAccounts, adCampaignGroups and adCampaigns return a code, field path and allowed range. Other endpoints return message, serviceErrorCode and status only (14). No idempotency key found. DRAFT status, a test ad account and `versionTag` reduce the cost of a wrong write, and Conversions API events are deduplicated by event ID (6). Every call needs two extra headers and Rest.li query encoding, and the official Python and JavaScript clients are beta, last released in 2023 (5).

The checklist (https://www.anchorterminal.com/benchmark/#checklist-ergonomics):

- 0 to 25, context cost. For MCP, the number and size of the tool definitions (25 for ten or fewer compact tools, 15 for 11 to 30, 5 for more than 30, plus up to 10 back for toolsets, dynamic loading or read-only subsets). For APIs, whether responses can be sized (field selection, limits, summaries).
- 20, pagination, filtering and output-size controls.
- 20, actionable, documented error responses, codes and messages an agent can recover from.
- 20, idempotency or safe retries, and for MCP the `readOnlyHint` and `destructiveHint` annotations.
- 15, sensible defaults, few required parameters, and official SDKs in at least two languages.

Models are read for tool use, structured output, prompt caching, context length, batch and SDKs. Frameworks for how much code and how many defaults a tool-calling agent with MCP needs.

## 4. Security & auth, 66 out of 100, up to 6 more on the total

Why it scored 66: Three-legged OAuth 2.0 only, with scopes per product such as r_ads, r_ads_reporting, rw_ads, rw_dmp_segments and rw_conversions. Access tokens last 60 days, refresh tokens 365, a member can revoke them, and a token introspection endpoint exists. The docs tell developers not to pass tokens in URLs (26). Read scopes are separate from rw_ads, the VIEWER role is read-only even with rw_ads, and Development tier limits edits to five ad accounts. No confirmation step for writes (16). Campaign data is mostly the advertiser's own, lead form responses are written by members, and no prompt-injection guidance was found (5). Entities carry created and last-modified times and the Developer Portal shows usage per endpoint. No audit log API found (5). security.txt names a HackerOne programme and has no Expires field. The DPA promises an annual SOC report and an ISO 27001 mapping on request. The HackerOne page needs JavaScript and was not read (14).

The checklist (https://www.anchorterminal.com/benchmark/#checklist-security):

- 0 to 30, the credential model. 30 for OAuth 2.1 with scopes, or scoped and revocable keys with rotation. 20 for plain revocable API keys. 10 for one all-powerful key. 10 off when a secret can travel in a URL query string as a documented option.
- 0 to 20, read-only or least-privilege modes, and confirmation or approval for destructive actions.
- 0 to 15, prompt-injection posture where the tool returns untrusted content (documented mitigations or guidance). A tool that returns no untrusted content gets 10.
- 0 to 15, audit logs or per-call visibility for the operator.
- 0 to 20, a security programme. security.txt or a disclosure policy, a bug bounty, SOC 2 or ISO 27001, advisories handled in public.

Models are read for retention, whether API data trains models (and whether that's off by default), zero-retention options and certifications. Frameworks for telemetry defaults, approval hooks, guardrails and sandboxing.

## 5. Schema & documentation, 66 out of 100, up to 5.5 more on the total

Why it scored 66: No OpenAPI specification found. The docs link a public Postman workspace, which needs JavaScript and was not read (5). Every docs page we requested with `Accept: text/markdown` came back as Markdown with front matter. No llms.txt at learn.microsoft.com (8). Reference pages state limits and restrictions per endpoint, with use-case guides and a restricted-uses page (14). Field tables give type, required and enum values, but queries use Rest.li syntax such as `List(urn%3Ali%3AsponsoredAccount%3A...)` and nested targeting criteria (11). curl and HTTP samples on each method, error tables per endpoint and a structured error schema on three resources (13). Monthly versions selected by header and a dated changelog (15).

The checklist (https://www.anchorterminal.com/benchmark/#checklist-schema):

APIs and MCP servers.

- 25, a machine-readable contract (a public OpenAPI file or similar; for MCP, typed JSON Schema inputs on every tool).
- 10, llms.txt or Markdown docs served for agents.
- 0 to 20, descriptions that say what a tool is for, when to use it and when not to, read from the tool definitions in the source or the API reference.
- 0 to 15, typed inputs with enums, constraints and required fields, and no free-form JSON blobs.
- 0 to 15, examples and documented error responses.
- 15, versioning and a public changelog.

Models are read from the API reference, the OpenAPI file, llms.txt, the structured-output and tool-use docs and the model cards. Frameworks from docs a model can follow, typed interfaces, examples and the API reference.

## 6. Maintenance & community, 64 out of 100, up to 3.2 more on the total

Why it scored 64: Version 202609 is the latest and the changelog page is dated 16 September 2026 (30). Versions 202607, 202608 and 202609 fall inside the last 90 days (20). Closed API with a dated changelog, a support ticket form and a help assistant. Standard tier reviews can take up to 30 business days (9). The official Python and JavaScript clients are marked beta. PyPI's newest is 0.3.0 from 29 June 2023 and npm's is 0.3.0 (3). Both client repositories have CI workflows, with last commits in November 2023 and March 2023 (2).

The checklist (https://www.anchorterminal.com/benchmark/#checklist-maintenance):

- 0 to 30, time since the last release, or the last published model or API change for a closed service. 30 within 30 days, 20 within 90, 10 within 180, 0 older.
- 20, at least three releases or dated changelog entries in the last 90 days.
- 0 to 25, responsiveness. Issues and pull requests answered on GitHub (the open issues and how recent the replies are). For closed services, a public changelog and a support or community channel that answers, 0 to 15.
- 15, presence in the official MCP registry under a verified namespace (MCP servers), or current official SDKs (APIs and models).
- 10, package health, current dependencies and CI.

Models are read for deprecation notice periods and model churn rather than release counts.

## 7. Transparency & trust, 84 out of 100, up to 1.4 more on the total

Made of editorial 74, provenance 94.

Why it scored 84: Closed API under the API terms of use (13 December 2022) and the Marketing API terms (25 July 2025), naming LinkedIn Corporation or LinkedIn Ireland Unlimited Company by region. The clients carry LinkedIn's own software licence (15). Privacy policy effective 3 November 2025, a DPA with 48-hour breach notice, a table of storage periods for API data, and reporting retention of ten years for performance data and two for demographics. The privacy policy gives no fixed retention periods (22). Each monthly version is supported for at least a year with a sunset date published, and the terms promise 30 days' notice before an API is discontinued, with security and legal exceptions (20). Subprocessor list dated 25 August 2026 with corporate locations (17).

The checklist (https://www.anchorterminal.com/benchmark/#checklist-transparency):

- 0 to 30, source availability and licence clarity. 30 for open source under an OSI licence, 15 for closed with clear terms, 0 for unclear terms.
- 0 to 30, data handling and retention statements that agree with each other (privacy policy, DPA, retention periods, subprocessors).
- 0 to 20, a deprecation policy or notices with dates.
- 0 to 20, telemetry disclosed with an opt-out (local software), or subprocessors and data locations disclosed (hosted).

The other half of Transparency and trust is the provenance score, computed from checked facts (below). The category score is the mean of the two.

Provenance checks not met in full (half of this category, computed from checked facts):

- Terms of service: published, but our reader couldn't read it (7 of 10)
- Privacy policy: published, but our reader couldn't read it (7 of 10)

## What we couldn't check

What we couldn't read counted as absent. Publishing it on a page a plain HTTP fetch can read (not only in a browser) lets the next check count it.

- unchecked: the HackerOne programme page (JavaScript only), so bounty terms and scope were not read
- unchecked: the Postman workspace contents (JavaScript only), so whether the collections cover every endpoint is not established
- unchecked: the developer product catalogue and the Developer Portal's rate-limit figures, which need a signed-in app
- Whether LinkedIn holds SOC 2 or ISO 27001 certification for Marketing Solutions. The DPA mentions an annual SOC report and an ISO 27001 mapping on request, and no public trust page was read
- The release date of each monthly version is inferred from the changelog page date (16 September 2026) and the sunset dates, not stated per version
- Whether an official MCP server or OpenAPI specification exists outside the pages reviewed. None was found
- Whether API access is free under every tier. No fee was found, and no page states it

## Weaknesses

- Standard rate limits are not published. An app sees its limit in the Developer Portal only after calling the endpoint
- No OpenAPI specification, llms.txt or MCP server was found. The contract is reference pages and a Postman workspace
- Access needs a LinkedIn Page, an approved developer application and member consent. Standard tier review can take up to 30 business days
- No idempotency keys or Retry-After header were found in the reviewed documentation
- The official Python and JavaScript clients are marked beta and were last released in 2023

## What costs an agent a turn today

The notes we give agents before they call it. Each one is a workaround an agent shouldn't need.

- Send `Linkedin-Version: YYYYMM` and `X-Restli-Protocol-Version: 2.0.0` on every call. A missing or sunset version returns an error (426 for a deprecated one)
- Create one test ad account with `"test": true` and build there first. Its creatives are auto-rejected and never billed, and it returns no reporting data
- Create campaigns as DRAFT or PAUSED and check `servingStatuses` before activating. Some validation is postponed until activation
- Pass `fields=` on adAnalytics. Responses stop at 15,000 elements and the endpoint throttles at 45 million metric values per 5 minutes
- On Development tier, map each ad account to the app in the Developer Portal. Edits are limited to five accounts

## When it's done

Send what changed and where it's published as a dispute (https://www.anchorterminal.com/builders/#disputes, or `POST https://www.anchorterminal.com/api/v1/contact` with `"kind": "dispute"`). Disputes are answered in public, and the listing is checked again by the same checklist. Paying for an audit or a listing claim changes nothing here.

What we couldn't check

  • unchecked: the HackerOne programme page (JavaScript only), so bounty terms and scope were not read
  • unchecked: the Postman workspace contents (JavaScript only), so whether the collections cover every endpoint is not established
  • unchecked: the developer product catalogue and the Developer Portal's rate-limit figures, which need a signed-in app
  • Whether LinkedIn holds SOC 2 or ISO 27001 certification for Marketing Solutions. The DPA mentions an annual SOC report and an ISO 27001 mapping on request, and no public trust page was read
  • The release date of each monthly version is inferred from the changelog page date (16 September 2026) and the sunset dates, not stated per version
  • Whether an official MCP server or OpenAPI specification exists outside the pages reviewed. None was found
  • Whether API access is free under every tier. No fee was found, and no page states it

Sources 27

  1. Marketing API hub learn.microsoft.com · seen 2026-10-08
  2. access tiers, products and scopes learn.microsoft.com · seen 2026-10-08
  3. quick start and access steps learn.microsoft.com · seen 2026-10-08
  4. versioning policy learn.microsoft.com · seen 2026-10-08
  5. changelog learn.microsoft.com · seen 2026-10-08
  6. version sunset table learn.microsoft.com · seen 2026-10-08
  7. rate limits learn.microsoft.com · seen 2026-10-08
  8. error handling learn.microsoft.com · seen 2026-10-08
  9. structured marketing error responses learn.microsoft.com · seen 2026-10-08
  10. campaigns reference learn.microsoft.com · seen 2026-10-08
  11. ad accounts and test ad accounts learn.microsoft.com · seen 2026-10-08
  12. ad account user roles learn.microsoft.com · seen 2026-10-08
  13. reporting reference, limits and retention learn.microsoft.com · seen 2026-10-08
  14. authorisation code flow learn.microsoft.com · seen 2026-10-08
  15. programmatic refresh tokens learn.microsoft.com · seen 2026-10-08
  16. breaking change policy learn.microsoft.com · seen 2026-10-08
  17. partner support guide learn.microsoft.com · seen 2026-10-08
  18. data storage requirements learn.microsoft.com · seen 2026-10-08
  19. status page incidents linkedin-apistatus.com · seen 2026-10-08
  20. API terms of use linkedin.com · seen 2026-10-08
  21. Marketing API terms linkedin.com · seen 2026-10-08
  22. privacy policy linkedin.com · seen 2026-10-08
  23. data processing agreement linkedin.com · seen 2026-10-08
  24. subprocessor list linkedin.com · seen 2026-10-08
  25. security.txt linkedin.com · seen 2026-10-08
  26. Python client repository github.com · seen 2026-10-08
  27. JavaScript client repository github.com · seen 2026-10-08

Probe metrics

Not measured yet. Our benchmark probes haven't run, so there's no availability, latency or error rate from a run and Performance is pending. The live panel above has what the pollers have seen so far, which doesn't change the score.

Pricing & changes

Free Free No fee for API access was found in the docs or terms, and no price page exists. Ad spend is set by campaign budgets and billed to the ad account. An agent can start without a contract on Development tier, where one test ad account needs no payment details and its campaigns are never served or billed (checked 2026-10-08).

Recent changes

  • security.txt on linkedin.com is none, the listing says valid source
  • Latest release

Follow them as a feed at /feeds/tools/linkedin-marketing-api.xml, or this listing's score history at history.json.

Connect

First request

curl -X GET 'https://api.linkedin.com/rest/adAnalytics?accounts=List(urn%3Ali%3AsponsoredAccount%3A511183580)&dateRange=(start:(day:28,month:7,year:2019))&pivot=(MEMBER_COUNTRY_V2)&q=analytics&timeGranularity=ALL&fields=impressions,pivotValues' \
  -H 'Authorization: Bearer {INSERT_TOKEN}' \
  -H 'Linkedin-Version: 202609' \
  -H 'X-Restli-Protocol-Version: 2.0.0'

Through letme picks today, calling later

GET https://letme.dev/linkedin-marketing-api

letme.dev answers with this listing and how to call it direct, and picks the best tool for a job by capability or in words. Calling through letme (one key, the vendor's own price) comes later. Nothing on letme.dev is for people to look at; this page explains it.

Similar toolGrade ScoreShared capabilitiesx402
Google Ads API GoogleBB76.4ads.reporting ads.campaigns ads.budgets ads.audiences ads.creativesno
Meta Marketing API Meta Platforms, Inc.B67.7ads.reporting ads.campaigns ads.budgets ads.audiences ads.creativesno
Microsoft Advertising API MicrosoftC60.3ads.reporting ads.campaigns ads.budgets ads.audiences ads.creativesno
Amazon Ads API AmazonC59ads.reporting ads.campaigns ads.budgets ads.audiences ads.creativesno

Machine-readable

Verify this listing

For the vendor

Is this your product? Link to this page from your own site or README, then tell us where. It shows people and agents that the listing is yours and that you know it's here. It never changes a grade, rank or review.

  1. Add the badge or a link

    LinkedIn Marketing APIs on Anchor Terminal, B, 62.4/100
    On a light page
    On a dark page
    <a href="https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/linkedin-marketing-api"><img src="https://www.anchorterminal.com/badges/linkedin-marketing-api.svg" alt="LinkedIn Marketing APIs on Anchor Terminal" height="20"></a>
    [![LinkedIn Marketing APIs on Anchor Terminal](https://www.anchorterminal.com/badges/linkedin-marketing-api.svg)](https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/linkedin-marketing-api)

    It counts on a page on the vendor's own domain.

  2. Tell us where it is

    We read it once now and again every week. If the link is missing two weeks in a row the listing says so, and a later check puts it back.

Agents send the same to POST /api/v1/verify as {"slug": "linkedin-marketing-api", "url": "…"}, or call the verify_listing tool at /mcp. Ten checks an hour from one address. What we check.

For companies

Do agents find, use and choose your tools?

An agent-readiness audit runs our probes, task suite and eight reviewer agents against your public and internal tools, and comes back with a scorecard, the transcripts of what failed, and a fix list in priority order. From $2,500, re-run included. We never take payment to move a rank. We do help companies earn one.