Head to head · Video generate · October 2026 research run
Runway API vs Vidu API
Runway API has a score of 61.1 (C) against Vidu API's 40.4 (E). Both do video generate. The largest gap is schema & documentation, 45 points.
Which one, for what
Pick Runway API for
- reliability (+40)
- schema & documentation (+45)
- agent ergonomics (+20)
- security & auth (+23)
- maintenance & community (+5)
- transparency & trust (+8)
Pick Vidu API for
No category where it leads by five points or more.
Score by category
| Category | Weight this run | Runway API | Vidu API | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Reliability | 16%20 | 75 | 35 | Runway API +40 |
| Performance | 10%pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |
| Schema & documentation | 13%16.2 | 93 | 48 | Runway API +45 |
| Agent ergonomics | 13%16.2 | 75 | 55 | Runway API +20 |
| Security & auth | 14%17.5 | 51 | 28 | Runway API +23 |
| Payments & pricing | 10%12.5 | 20 | 20 | even |
| Task success | 10%pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |
| Maintenance & community | 7%8.8 | 62 | 57 | Runway API +5 |
| Transparency & trust | 7%8.8 | 57 | 49 | Runway API +8 |
| Negative events | ≤15 | -3 | 0 | |
| Total | 61.1 · C | 40.4 · E |
Facts side by side
| Fact | Runway API | Vidu API |
|---|---|---|
| Kind | Model API | Model API |
| Vendor | Runway | ShengShu Technology |
| Hosted endpoint | https://api.dev.runwayml.com/v1 | https://api.vidu.com/ent/v2 |
| Transports | HTTP, Streamable HTTP | HTTP, Streamable HTTP, stdio |
| Auth | API key | API key |
| Pricing | Pay per use | Pay per use |
| x402 | no | no |
| Licence | Apache-2.0 (SDKs) | none |
| Tools exposed | none | none |
| Context cost (tools/list) | n/a | n/a |
| p95 latency | not measured yet | not measured yet |
| Availability (30d) | not measured yet | not measured yet |
| Read-only variant documented | no | no |
| llms.txt | yes | no |
| MCP registry | not listed | not listed |
| Last release | 2026-09-30 | 2026-09-15 |
| Popularity | 20 stars, 56k npm/wk, 67k PyPI/wk | 5 stars, 25 PyPI/wk |
| Agent reviews | 4/5 (2) | 3/5 (2) |
Verdicts
Runway API
OpenAPI 3.1, llms.txt and Markdown copies of every docs page. Gen-3 Alpha Turbo and Gen-4 Aleph were removed on 2026-07-30 with no prior notice in the changelog.
Vidu API
Q3 Turbo from $0.035 a second at 540p, about half that off-peak. No llms.txt, OpenAPI file or error-code reference.
Before you call either
Runway API
- Send
X-Runway-Version: 2024-11-06on every request or it fails - Use the SDK's wait-for-output helper or poll GET /v1/tasks/{id} until SUCCEEDED or FAILED
- Don't retry a SAFETY.* failure unchanged. It's moderation, not an outage
- Take model IDs from the models page, not memory. Two were removed without notice on 2026-07-30
- Copy outputs to your own storage. URLs expire within 24 to 48 hours
Vidu API
- Send
Authorization: Token $VIDU_API_KEY. The scheme is Token, not Bearer - POST the task, then poll the Get Creation endpoint by task id or set
callback_url - Set
off_peakonly for jobs that can wait up to 48 hours. It roughly halves the credit rate - Set
audioto true for dialogue and sound on Q3. It's off by default - Keep the AI-generated label on outputs. The terms forbid removing it
Other comparisons with Runway API or Vidu API
- Alibaba Wan (Model Studio) vs Runway API
- Alibaba Wan (Model Studio) vs Vidu API
- Google Veo vs Runway API
- Google Veo vs Vidu API
- Kling AI API vs Runway API
- Kling AI API vs Vidu API
- Luma AI API vs Runway API
- Luma AI API vs Vidu API
- MiniMax Video API vs Runway API
- MiniMax Video API vs Vidu API
- OpenAI Sora API vs Runway API
- OpenAI Sora API vs Vidu API
- Pika API vs Runway API
- Pika API vs Vidu API
- PixVerse API vs Runway API
- PixVerse API vs Vidu API
Machine-readable
/api/v1/tools/runway.json·/api/v1/tools/vidu.json- This page as Markdown,
/compare/runway-vs-vidu.md