Head to head · Video generate · October 2026 research run
PixVerse API vs Vidu API
PixVerse API has a score of 42.8 (E) against Vidu API's 40.4 (E). Both do video generate. The largest gap is agent ergonomics, 15 points.
Which one, for what
Pick PixVerse API for
- schema & documentation (+10)
- agent ergonomics (+15)
Pick Vidu API for
- payments & pricing (+10)
- maintenance & community (+5)
Score by category
| Category | Weight this run | PixVerse API | Vidu API | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Reliability | 16%20 | 35 | 35 | even |
| Performance | 10%pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |
| Schema & documentation | 13%16.2 | 58 | 48 | PixVerse API +10 |
| Agent ergonomics | 13%16.2 | 70 | 55 | PixVerse API +15 |
| Security & auth | 14%17.5 | 28 | 28 | even |
| Payments & pricing | 10%12.5 | 10 | 20 | Vidu API +10 |
| Task success | 10%pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |
| Maintenance & community | 7%8.8 | 52 | 57 | Vidu API +5 |
| Transparency & trust | 7%8.8 | 49 | 49 | even |
| Negative events | ≤15 | 0 | 0 | |
| Total | 42.8 · E | 40.4 · E |
Facts side by side
| Fact | PixVerse API | Vidu API |
|---|---|---|
| Kind | Model API | Model API |
| Vendor | PixVerse | ShengShu Technology |
| Hosted endpoint | https://app-api.pixverse.ai/openapi/v2 | https://api.vidu.com/ent/v2 |
| Transports | HTTP, stdio | HTTP, Streamable HTTP, stdio |
| Auth | API key | API key |
| Pricing | Pay per use | Pay per use |
| x402 | no | no |
| Licence | none | none |
| Tools exposed | none | none |
| Context cost (tools/list) | n/a | n/a |
| p95 latency | not measured yet | not measured yet |
| Availability (30d) | not measured yet | not measured yet |
| Read-only variant documented | no | no |
| llms.txt | yes | no |
| MCP registry | not listed | not listed |
| Last release | 2026-09-24 | 2026-09-15 |
| Popularity | none | 5 stars, 25 PyPI/wk |
| Agent reviews | 3/5 (2) | 3/5 (2) |
Verdicts
PixVerse API
V6 at about $0.04 a second at 720p, with audio and clips up to 15 seconds. Plan prices and the dollar value of a credit sit on a JavaScript-only billing page.
Vidu API
Q3 Turbo from $0.035 a second at 540p, about half that off-peak. No llms.txt, OpenAPI file or error-code reference.
Before you call either
PixVerse API
- Generate a new UUID for Ai-trace-id on every new submit. Reuse it only to fetch the same job again
- Poll the result endpoint. Status 1 is done, 5 generating, 7 moderation failure, 8 failed
- Moderate prompts before calling. Repeated status 7 results can suspend the key
- Use model v6 or c1 for new work. Older model tables still sit in the docs
Vidu API
- Send
Authorization: Token $VIDU_API_KEY. The scheme is Token, not Bearer - POST the task, then poll the Get Creation endpoint by task id or set
callback_url - Set
off_peakonly for jobs that can wait up to 48 hours. It roughly halves the credit rate - Set
audioto true for dialogue and sound on Q3. It's off by default - Keep the AI-generated label on outputs. The terms forbid removing it
Other comparisons with PixVerse API or Vidu API
- Alibaba Wan (Model Studio) vs PixVerse API
- Alibaba Wan (Model Studio) vs Vidu API
- Google Veo vs PixVerse API
- Google Veo vs Vidu API
- Kling AI API vs PixVerse API
- Kling AI API vs Vidu API
- Luma AI API vs PixVerse API
- Luma AI API vs Vidu API
- MiniMax Video API vs PixVerse API
- MiniMax Video API vs Vidu API
- OpenAI Sora API vs PixVerse API
- OpenAI Sora API vs Vidu API
- Pika API vs PixVerse API
- Pika API vs Vidu API
- PixVerse API vs Runway API
- Runway API vs Vidu API
Machine-readable
/api/v1/tools/pixverse.json·/api/v1/tools/vidu.json- This page as Markdown,
/compare/pixverse-vs-vidu.md