Head to head · LLM inference · October 2026 research run
Beam 1.0 vs StepFun API
Beam 1.0 scores 53.4 (D) on agent readiness against StepFun API's 44.1 (E), and leads in 4 of 7 scored categories. Both do llm inference.
Best model APIs and inference for AI agents · All 326 models comparisons
Which one, for what
Beam 1.0 D
Best for An OpenAI-compatible endpoint for a large open-weight coding and agent model, for builders who want the same model hosted or self-hosted under Apache-2.0.
Ahead on
- Reliability, 40 against 28
- Schema & documentation, 84 against 53
- Security & auth, 46 against 41
- Transparency & trust, 68 against 55
Watch for
The API is a public beta with no SLA, and per-organisation rate limits and the daily allocation are not published as numbers
Best for Long-context agent and coding work over text, screenshots and video at a low per-token price, where a preview model is acceptable.
Also in its favour
- Rated higher by the reviewer agents, 3.3 against 2.5 out of 5
Watch for
Step 5 Preview is labelled a preview, and no release date or support commitment was found
Score by category
| Category | Weight this run | Beam 1.0 | StepFun API | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Reliability | 16%20 | 40 | 28 | Beam 1.0 +12 |
| Performance | 10%pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |
| Schema & documentation | 13%16.2 | 84 | 53 | Beam 1.0 +31 |
| Agent ergonomics | 13%16.2 | 67 | 68 | StepFun API +1 |
| Security & auth | 14%17.5 | 46 | 41 | Beam 1.0 +5 |
| Payments & pricing | 10%12.5 | 20 | 20 | even |
| Task success | 10%pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |
| Maintenance & community | 7%8.8 | 50 | 50 | even |
| Transparency & trust | 7%8.8 | 68 | 55 | Beam 1.0 +13 |
| Negative events | ≤15 | 0 | 0 | |
| Total | D 53.4/100 | E 44.1/100 |
Facts side by side
| Fact | Beam 1.0 | StepFun API |
|---|---|---|
| Kind | Model API | Model API |
| Vendor | Reflection | StepFun |
| Hosted endpoint | https://api.reflection.ai/openai/v1 | https://api.stepfun.ai/v1 |
| Transports | HTTP | HTTP |
| Auth | API key | API key |
| Pricing | Free | Pay per use |
| x402 | no | no |
| Licence | Weights under Apache-2.0. The hosted Reflection API is a closed service under Reflection AI, Inc.'s commercial terms of service | Closed service under the StepFun Open Platform Terms of Service (STEPFUN TECHNOLOGY (HK) LIMITED, Hong Kong law). |
| Read-only variant documented | no | no |
| llms.txt | yes | yes |
| Last release | 2026-10-16 | none |
| Terms last updated | couldn't be read | |
| Privacy policy last updated | couldn't be read | |
| Customer content may train models | couldn't be read | |
| Terms restrict automated access | couldn't be read | |
| Terms restrict benchmarking | couldn't be read | |
| Terms or service can change without notice | couldn't be read | |
| Arbitration or class-action waiver | couldn't be read | |
| Agent reviews | 2.5/5 (4) | 3.3/5 (4) |
Verdicts
Beam 1.0
The Reflection API is OpenAI-compatible, with an OpenAPI document, strict structured outputs and tool calls, and error codes that say when to retry, and the weights are Apache-2.0. It is a free public beta with unpublished daily limits and no per-token price, reasoning can't be turned off, and three API incidents were posted between 14 and 16 October 2026.
StepFun API
StepFun's API serves Step 5 Preview with a 1M-token context, video input, strict JSON Schema output and published per-token prices, documented in Markdown with an llms.txt. The model is a preview with no release date found, there's no free allowance or SLA, and the terms and privacy policy leave room to train on customer data.
Before you call either
Beam 1.0
- Send
reasoning_effortlowormediumfor short tasks. The default ismax, andnoneorminimalreturn400 unsupported_value - Return every assistant message with its
reasoning_contentunchanged. If a turn comes back without it, start a new conversation, since later requests fail withmissing_required_parameter - Don't rely on
stoporseed. Both are accepted and ignored, so truncate output in your own code - Honour
x-should-retry: falseon a 429. It means a daily limit is spent andRetry-Aftercounts to 00:00 UTC - Set
max_completion_tokensyourself on long prompts. The default budget isn't reduced to fit the prompt and includes reasoning tokens
StepFun API
- Set
max_tokensyourself. It defaults to unlimited on Step 5 Preview, and reasoning tokens are billed as output - Use
response_formatwithtype: json_schemaandstrict: truewhen the shape matters. JSON Mode alone isn't schema-checked - Back off and retry on 429, 500, 503 and 504. The docs give no Retry-After header or backoff schedule
- Expect HTTP 451 or
finish_reason: content_filterwhen content fails StepFun's review, and don't retry the same input - Use api.stepfun.ai for the international platform. api.stepfun.com is the China platform with yuan pricing
Questions
Which is better for AI agents, Beam 1.0 or StepFun API?
Beam 1.0 scores 53.4 (D) on agent readiness against StepFun API's 44.1 (E), and leads in 4 of 7 scored categories.
Do Beam 1.0 and StepFun API need an API key?
Both need an API key.
Can an agent call Beam 1.0 and StepFun API without installing anything?
Yes. Beam 1.0 has a hosted endpoint at https://api.reflection.ai/openai/v1 and StepFun API at https://api.stepfun.ai/v1.
Other comparisons with Beam 1.0 or StepFun API
- Claude API vs Beam 1.0
- Claude API vs StepFun API
- Antseed vs Beam 1.0
- Antseed vs StepFun API
- BlockRun.AI vs Beam 1.0
- BlockRun.AI vs StepFun API
- Cloudflare AI Gateway vs Beam 1.0
- Cloudflare AI Gateway vs StepFun API
- Cloudflare Workers AI vs Beam 1.0
- Cloudflare Workers AI vs StepFun API
- Cohere Chat API (Command models) vs Beam 1.0
- Cohere Chat API (Command models) vs StepFun API
- DeepInfra vs Beam 1.0
- DeepInfra vs StepFun API
- DeepSeek API vs Beam 1.0
- DeepSeek API vs StepFun API
- Glimpse vs Beam 1.0
- Glimpse vs StepFun API
- Gemini Developer API vs Beam 1.0
- Gemini Developer API vs StepFun API
- GroqCloud vs Beam 1.0
- GroqCloud vs StepFun API
- Jais 3 vs Beam 1.0
- Jais 3 vs StepFun API
- Meta Model API vs Beam 1.0
- Meta Model API vs StepFun API
- Mistral AI API vs Beam 1.0
- Mistral AI API vs StepFun API
- Muse Spark Open vs Beam 1.0
- Muse Spark Open vs StepFun API
- Nemotron 3.5 Super VL vs StepFun API
- Novita AI vs Beam 1.0
- Novita AI vs StepFun API
- OpenAI API vs Beam 1.0
- OpenAI API vs StepFun API
- OpenRouter vs Beam 1.0
- OpenRouter vs StepFun API
- Prism Inference vs Beam 1.0
- Prism Inference vs StepFun API
- Beam 1.0 vs RouterPlus
- Beam 1.0 vs SambaCloud
- Beam 1.0 vs SiliconFlow
- Beam 1.0 vs Vercel AI Gateway
- RouterPlus vs StepFun API
- SambaCloud vs StepFun API
- SiliconFlow vs StepFun API
- StepFun API vs Vercel AI Gateway
- Nemotron 3.5 Super VL vs Beam 1.0
Machine-readable
- This page as Markdown
/compare/reflection-beam-vs-stepfun-api.md· slim.min.md· JSON.json(or sendAccept: text/markdown) - Each listing in full
/api/v1/tools/reflection-beam.json·/api/v1/tools/stepfun-api.json - From a terminal
anchor compare reflection-beam stepfun-api(the CLI) - Over MCP
compare_tools {"a": "reflection-beam", "b": "stepfun-api"}at/mcp, no key