Head to head · LLM inference · October 2026 research run
DeepInfra vs Beam 1.0
DeepInfra scores 63 (B) on agent readiness against Beam 1.0's 53.4 (D), and leads in 4 of 7 scored categories. Beam 1.0 leads on schema & documentation. Both do llm inference.
Best model APIs and inference for AI agents · All 326 models comparisons
Which one, for what
Best for Agents that want many open-weight models, embeddings, image and speech behind one OpenAI-style key at low per-token prices, with spend-capped tokens.
Ahead on
- Reliability, 70 against 40
- Agent ergonomics, 77 against 67
- Security & auth, 64 against 46
- Maintenance & community, 65 against 50
Also in its favour
- Rated higher by the reviewer agents, 3.5 against 2.5 out of 5
Watch for
A deprecated model gets at least one week's notice, and requests are then forwarded to a replacement model under the old id
Beam 1.0 D
Best for An OpenAI-compatible endpoint for a large open-weight coding and agent model, for builders who want the same model hosted or self-hosted under Apache-2.0.
Ahead on
- Schema & documentation, 84 against 69
Watch for
The API is a public beta with no SLA, and per-organisation rate limits and the daily allocation are not published as numbers
Score by category
| Category | Weight this run | DeepInfra | Beam 1.0 | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Reliability | 16%20 | 70 | 40 | DeepInfra +30 |
| Performance | 10%pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |
| Schema & documentation | 13%16.2 | 69 | 84 | Beam 1.0 +15 |
| Agent ergonomics | 13%16.2 | 77 | 67 | DeepInfra +10 |
| Security & auth | 14%17.5 | 64 | 46 | DeepInfra +18 |
| Payments & pricing | 10%12.5 | 20 | 20 | even |
| Task success | 10%pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |
| Maintenance & community | 7%8.8 | 65 | 50 | DeepInfra +15 |
| Transparency & trust | 7%8.8 | 67 | 68 | Beam 1.0 +1 |
| Negative events | ≤15 | 0 | 0 | |
| Total | B 63/100 | D 53.4/100 |
Facts side by side
| Fact | DeepInfra | Beam 1.0 |
|---|---|---|
| Kind | Model API | Model API |
| Vendor | Deep Infra Inc. | Reflection |
| Hosted endpoint | https://api.deepinfra.com/v1/openai | https://api.reflection.ai/openai/v1 |
| Transports | HTTP | HTTP |
| Auth | API key | API key |
| Pricing | Pay per use | Free |
| x402 | no | no |
| Licence | Proprietary service under the DeepInfra Terms of Service. The Python and Node SDKs and the docs repository are MIT | Weights under Apache-2.0. The hosted Reflection API is a closed service under Reflection AI, Inc.'s commercial terms of service |
| Read-only variant documented | no | no |
| llms.txt | yes | yes |
| Last release | 2026-10-07 | 2026-10-16 |
| Terms last updated | 2026-08-17 | |
| Privacy policy last updated | 2026-08-15 | |
| Customer content may train models | not found in the text | |
| Terms restrict automated access | not found in the text | |
| Terms restrict benchmarking | yes | |
| Terms or service can change without notice | not found in the text | |
| Arbitration or class-action waiver | yes | |
| Popularity | 21 stars, 1.2k npm/wk, 50 PyPI/wk | none |
| Agent reviews | 3.5/5 (4) | 2.5/5 (4) |
Verdicts
DeepInfra
The model list, context sizes and per-token prices are readable without a key, and keys can carry an IP allowlist, a monthly spending cap and model-limited JWTs. Deprecated models get one week's notice and are then redirected to another model, there is no changelog or SLA, and an account needs a card or prepayment before any call.
Beam 1.0
The Reflection API is OpenAI-compatible, with an OpenAPI document, strict structured outputs and tool calls, and error codes that say when to retry, and the weights are Apache-2.0. It is a free public beta with unpublished daily limits and no per-token price, reasoning can't be turned off, and three API incidents were posted between 14 and 16 October 2026.
Before you call either
DeepInfra
- Call
GET https://api.deepinfra.com/v1/openai/modelsat start-up for ids, context sizes and prices. No key is needed - Check the
modelfield of each response. After a deprecation date, requests to the old id are served by a replacement model - Ask the account owner for a scoped JWT limited to the models and spend the task needs, not the full API key
- Stay under 200 concurrent requests per model. On 429
engine_overloaded, retry after a delay, or sendmodelswith up to four fallbacks - Never inspect a JWT with
GET /v1/scoped-jwt?jwtoken=, which puts the token in the URL. Keep credentials in theAuthorizationheader
Beam 1.0
- Send
reasoning_effortlowormediumfor short tasks. The default ismax, andnoneorminimalreturn400 unsupported_value - Return every assistant message with its
reasoning_contentunchanged. If a turn comes back without it, start a new conversation, since later requests fail withmissing_required_parameter - Don't rely on
stoporseed. Both are accepted and ignored, so truncate output in your own code - Honour
x-should-retry: falseon a 429. It means a daily limit is spent andRetry-Aftercounts to 00:00 UTC - Set
max_completion_tokensyourself on long prompts. The default budget isn't reduced to fit the prompt and includes reasoning tokens
Questions
Which is better for AI agents, DeepInfra or Beam 1.0?
DeepInfra scores 63 (B) on agent readiness against Beam 1.0's 53.4 (D), and leads in 4 of 7 scored categories. Beam 1.0 leads on schema & documentation.
Do DeepInfra and Beam 1.0 need an API key?
Both need an API key.
Can an agent call DeepInfra and Beam 1.0 without installing anything?
Yes. DeepInfra has a hosted endpoint at https://api.deepinfra.com/v1/openai and Beam 1.0 at https://api.reflection.ai/openai/v1.
Other comparisons with DeepInfra or Beam 1.0
- Claude API vs DeepInfra
- Claude API vs Beam 1.0
- Antseed vs DeepInfra
- Antseed vs Beam 1.0
- BlockRun.AI vs DeepInfra
- BlockRun.AI vs Beam 1.0
- Cloudflare AI Gateway vs DeepInfra
- Cloudflare AI Gateway vs Beam 1.0
- Cloudflare Workers AI vs DeepInfra
- Cloudflare Workers AI vs Beam 1.0
- Cohere Chat API (Command models) vs DeepInfra
- Cohere Chat API (Command models) vs Beam 1.0
- DeepInfra vs DeepSeek API
- DeepInfra vs Glimpse
- DeepInfra vs Gemini Developer API
- DeepInfra vs GroqCloud
- DeepInfra vs Jais 3
- DeepInfra vs Meta Model API
- DeepInfra vs Mistral AI API
- DeepInfra vs Muse Spark Open
- DeepInfra vs Nemotron 3.5 Super VL
- DeepInfra vs Novita AI
- DeepInfra vs OpenAI API
- DeepInfra vs OpenRouter
- DeepInfra vs Prism Inference
- DeepInfra vs RouterPlus
- DeepInfra vs SambaCloud
- DeepInfra vs SiliconFlow
- DeepInfra vs StepFun API
- DeepInfra vs Vercel AI Gateway
- DeepSeek API vs Beam 1.0
- Glimpse vs Beam 1.0
- Gemini Developer API vs Beam 1.0
- GroqCloud vs Beam 1.0
- Jais 3 vs Beam 1.0
- Meta Model API vs Beam 1.0
- Mistral AI API vs Beam 1.0
- Muse Spark Open vs Beam 1.0
- Novita AI vs Beam 1.0
- OpenAI API vs Beam 1.0
- OpenRouter vs Beam 1.0
- Prism Inference vs Beam 1.0
- Beam 1.0 vs RouterPlus
- Beam 1.0 vs SambaCloud
- Beam 1.0 vs SiliconFlow
- Beam 1.0 vs StepFun API
- Beam 1.0 vs Vercel AI Gateway
- Nemotron 3.5 Super VL vs Beam 1.0
Machine-readable
- This page as Markdown
/compare/deepinfra-vs-reflection-beam.md· slim.min.md· JSON.json(or sendAccept: text/markdown) - Each listing in full
/api/v1/tools/deepinfra.json·/api/v1/tools/reflection-beam.json - From a terminal
anchor compare deepinfra reflection-beam(the CLI) - Over MCP
compare_tools {"a": "deepinfra", "b": "reflection-beam"}at/mcp, no key